Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 236: Line 236:
  
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--pH_Dependent_Promoter.jpeg|thumb|right|500px| Figure 2. Normalized fluorescent values from CpxR construct vs control (YGCP). The fluorescence per cell count stayed generally the same throughout the range of pH while the CpxR has a clear increase in fluorescence per cell.]]
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--pH_Dependent_Promoter.jpeg|thumb|right|500px| Figure 2. Normalized fluorescent values from CpxR construct vs control (YGCP). The fluorescence per cell count stayed generally the same throughout the range of pH while the CpxR has a clear increase in fluorescence per cell.]]
 +
[[File:YGCPtube.png|thumb|left|275px|Figure 1. amajLime expressed in <i>E. coli</i> in liquid LB]]
 +
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 244: Line 246:
  
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Patp2Results.png|thumb|right|500px| Figure 3. Spun down P-atp2 constructs compared to controls in pH6-9. There is no clear gradient change in color expression.]]
 
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Patp2Results.png|thumb|right|500px| Figure 3. Spun down P-atp2 constructs compared to controls in pH6-9. There is no clear gradient change in color expression.]]
 +
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--BCPtube.png|thumb|center|150px| Figure 2. amilCP expressed in <i> E. coli </i> and in liquid LB]]
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
Line 249: Line 252:
 
<p><u>GOX Sequences as Putative Promoters</u></p>
 
<p><u>GOX Sequences as Putative Promoters</u></p>
  
<br>
+
 
<p><h2>Composite Parts</h2></p>
+
  
  

Revision as of 07:37, 18 October 2016

Austin_UTexas

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!




Kombucha Strains

Conjugation

Recapitulation

Ethanol

pH Sensors