Difference between revisions of "Team:Oxford/Parts"

 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 93: Line 93:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Having characterised each we could have a better understanding of a system whereby dietary copper was detected and a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" placement:"top" title="Chelator" data-content="A molecule, here a protein, able to from multiple bonds to a single metal ion.">chelator</a> produced until the free copper concentration is reduced to a stable level.  
+
Having characterised each we could have a better understanding of a system whereby dietary copper was detected and a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" placement:"top" title="Chelator" data-content="A molecule, here a protein, able to form multiple bonds to a single metal ion.">chelator</a> produced until the free copper concentration is reduced to a stable level.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 128: Line 128:
 
We codon optimised Csp1 to <i>E. coli</i> and replaced the original TAT sequence with a TAT sequence from the <i>E. coli</i> protein <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="CueO" data-content="An E. coli multicopper oxidase enzyme that protects against copper toxicity by oxidising Cu(I) to the less toxic Cu(II)"> CueO</a>, which is also involved in copper regulation. To get Csp1 from the shipping vector to the pBAD expression system for testing the TAT sequence had to be modified by the addition of a serine residue after the initiator amino acid of methionine. Serine was chosen over other amino acid possibilities because other TAT sequences seemed to have serine in this location.  
 
We codon optimised Csp1 to <i>E. coli</i> and replaced the original TAT sequence with a TAT sequence from the <i>E. coli</i> protein <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="CueO" data-content="An E. coli multicopper oxidase enzyme that protects against copper toxicity by oxidising Cu(I) to the less toxic Cu(II)"> CueO</a>, which is also involved in copper regulation. To get Csp1 from the shipping vector to the pBAD expression system for testing the TAT sequence had to be modified by the addition of a serine residue after the initiator amino acid of methionine. Serine was chosen over other amino acid possibilities because other TAT sequences seemed to have serine in this location.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0e/Csp1_single_for_Chelators_page_Sam_Oxford_2016.png" width="50%"/><figcaption>A Csp1 monomer from Vita <i>et al.</i> <sup>(1)</sup></figcaption>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0e/Csp1_single_for_Chelators_page_Sam_Oxford_2016.png" width="50%"/><figcaption>A Csp1 monomer with chelated copper from Vita <i>et al.</i> <sup>(1)</sup></figcaption>
 
<p>You can view a animation of the full Csp1 tetramer <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/91/Csp1_with_copper_gif_Oxford_2016_Sam.gif">here</a>.</p>
 
<p>You can view a animation of the full Csp1 tetramer <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/91/Csp1_with_copper_gif_Oxford_2016_Sam.gif">here</a>.</p>
 
<h3 id="Csp1sfGFP">TAT Csp1 sfGFP</h3>
 
<h3 id="Csp1sfGFP">TAT Csp1 sfGFP</h3>
Line 138: Line 138:
 
<h2 id="MymTH">Mycobacterial Metallothionien (MymT)</h2>
 
<h2 id="MymTH">Mycobacterial Metallothionien (MymT)</h2>
 
<p>
 
<p>
MymT is a small prokaryotic <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Metallothein" data-content="Very small Cysteine-rich proteins involved in transport and storage">metallothein</a> discovered in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> by Gold <i>et al.</i><sup>(2)</sup>. It is believed that the protein may help the bacterium survive copper toxicity. No crystal structure of MymT was obtained but there is an NMR structure of a eukaryotic homologue<sup>(3)</sup>:  
+
MymT is a small prokaryotic <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Metallothein" data-content="Very small Cysteine-rich proteins involved in transport and storage">metallothein</a> discovered in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> by Gold <i>et al.</i><sup>(2)</sup> It is believed that the protein may help the bacterium survive copper toxicity. No crystal structure of MymT was obtained but there is an NMR structure of a eukaryotic homologue<sup>(3)</sup>:  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ca/MymT_image_for_parts_page_Sam_Oxford_2016.png" width="25%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ca/MymT_image_for_parts_page_Sam_Oxford_2016.png" width="25%" /><figcaption>NMR average of yeast Cu Metallothein (PDB: 1AQR)</figcaption>
  
 
<h3 id="MymT">MymT</h3>
 
<h3 id="MymT">MymT</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
MymT is much smaller than Csp1 and, because we did not add in a secretion tag is intended to be cytoplasmic. It can bind up to 7 copper ions but has a preference for 4-6.<sup>(2)</sup>
+
MymT is much smaller than Csp1 and, because we did not add in a secretion tag, is intended to be cytoplasmic. It can bind up to 7 copper ions but has a preference for 4-6.<sup>(2)</sup>
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
Line 163: Line 163:
 
We investigated both systems and by arranging the components to form a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Positive feedback" data-content="As system whereby a small increase in the concentration of a substance (here activator) leads then to a greater increase in the concentration of the same substance">positive feedback loop</a> hoped to improve their sensitivity over the range of copper concentrations we were interested in.
 
We investigated both systems and by arranging the components to form a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Positive feedback" data-content="As system whereby a small increase in the concentration of a substance (here activator) leads then to a greater increase in the concentration of the same substance">positive feedback loop</a> hoped to improve their sensitivity over the range of copper concentrations we were interested in.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
 
  
  
Line 170: Line 168:
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/47/T--Oxford--cueRtoDNA.png" width="25%" /><figcaption>The <i>E. coli</i> copper regulator CueR: monomer with copper (red) and without copper (cyan) attached to the pCopA promoter showing DNA bending. (cealigned in pymol from PDB 4wls and 4wlw)<sup>(6)</sup></figcaption>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/47/T--Oxford--cueRtoDNA.png" width="25%" /><figcaption>The <i>E. coli</i> copper regulator CueR: monomer with copper (red) and without copper (cyan) attached to the pCopA promoter showing DNA bending. (cealigned in pymol from PDB 4wls and 4wlw)<sup>(6)</sup></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
<i>E. coli</i> cells use a protein called CueR to regulate the cytoplasmic copper concentration. CueR is a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="MerR" data-content="An E. coli transcription factor with a helix-turn-helix motif that regulates the bacterial cells’ response to mercury ">MerR</a>-type regulator with an interesting <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Oxford/CueR_MOI">mechanism of action</a> whereby it can behave as a net activator or a net repressor under different copper concentrations through interaction with <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="RNA polymerase" data-content="An enzyme that transcribes the DNA sequence of a gene into an mRNA sequence that is then translated into a protein sequence.">RNA polymerase</a><sup>(7)</sup>. More information and an animated version of the above image can be found <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Oxford/CueR_MOI">here</a>. CueR forms dimers consisting of three functional domains (a DNA-binding, a dimerisation and a metal-binding domain). The DNA binding domains bind to DNA <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Inverted Repeat" data-content="A DNA sequence followed downstream by its reverse complement">inverted repeats</a> called CueR boxes with the sequence:  
+
<i>E. coli</i> cells use a protein called CueR to regulate the cytoplasmic copper concentration. CueR is a <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="MerR" data-content="An E. coli transcription factor with a helix-turn-helix motif that regulates the bacterial cells’ response to mercury ">MerR</a>-type regulator with an interesting <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Oxford/CueR_MOI">mechanism of action</a> whereby it can behave as a net activator or a net repressor under different copper concentrations through interaction with <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="RNA polymerase" data-content="An enzyme that transcribes the DNA sequence of a gene into an mRNA sequence that is then translated into a protein sequence.">RNA polymerase</a>.<sup>(7)</sup> More information and an animated version of the above image can be found <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Oxford/CueR_MOI">here</a>. CueR forms dimers consisting of three functional domains (a DNA-binding, a dimerisation and a metal-binding domain). The DNA binding domains bind to DNA <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="Inverted Repeat" data-content="A DNA sequence followed downstream by its reverse complement">inverted repeats</a> called CueR boxes with the sequence:  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 187: Line 185:
  
 
<h3 id="pcg">pCopA sfGFP</h3>
 
<h3 id="pcg">pCopA sfGFP</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/Pcg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/Pcg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980005">BBa_K1980005</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
The simplest system we tested was simply the pCopA promoter in front of sfGFP. We found that this system was only weakly copper responsive. This may be because there were 500+ copies of the pCopA promoter located on the high copy plasmid compared with only a single copy of CueR expressed from the bacterial genome. If CueR is only weakly expressed then there would be insufficient protein to bind at all of the promoter binding sites and the genes could not be activated.</p>
 
The simplest system we tested was simply the pCopA promoter in front of sfGFP. We found that this system was only weakly copper responsive. This may be because there were 500+ copies of the pCopA promoter located on the high copy plasmid compared with only a single copy of CueR expressed from the bacterial genome. If CueR is only weakly expressed then there would be insufficient protein to bind at all of the promoter binding sites and the genes could not be activated.</p>
 
<p>A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
<p>A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fd/Pcg_graph_4h_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fd/Pcg_graph_4h_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980005 after 4 hours </figcaption>
  
  
  
<h3 id="pg">pCopA sfGFP with divergently expressed CueR</h3>
+
<h3 id="pg">pCopA sfGFP with divergent CueR</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6d/Pg_diagram_v1_Sam_Oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6d/Pg_diagram_v1_Sam_Oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Our biosensor design. We unfortunately never managed to submit this part</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The promoter system we ordered was based upon <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758324">this part</a> in the registry from Team Bielefeld-CeBiTec in 2015.  
+
This promoter system was based upon <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758324">this part</a> in the registry from Team Bielefeld-CeBiTec in 2015.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 207: Line 205:
 
The first part is a pCopA-RBS-sfGFP and the second part is the regulator CueR expressed from a constitutive promoter. The part is deposited in the registry and labelled to suggest the CueR is expressed divergent from the sfGFP (on the opposite strand and transcribed in the opposite direction):  
 
The first part is a pCopA-RBS-sfGFP and the second part is the regulator CueR expressed from a constitutive promoter. The part is deposited in the registry and labelled to suggest the CueR is expressed divergent from the sfGFP (on the opposite strand and transcribed in the opposite direction):  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/20/PG_incorrect_Oxford_Sam_2016.png" width="75%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/20/PG_incorrect_Oxford_Sam_2016.png" width="75%" /><figcaption>How BBa_K1758324 is labelled in the registry</figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
However if you look at the sequence level this is clearly not the case. The constitutive promoter and the CueR start codon are at the 5’ end of the sfGFP coding strand and the CueR stop codon just upstream of pCopA. The part in fact has the constitutive promoter on the same strand as pCopA and sfGFP facing in the same direction and would be better represented like this:  
 
However if you look at the sequence level this is clearly not the case. The constitutive promoter and the CueR start codon are at the 5’ end of the sfGFP coding strand and the CueR stop codon just upstream of pCopA. The part in fact has the constitutive promoter on the same strand as pCopA and sfGFP facing in the same direction and would be better represented like this:  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/PCopA_CueR_incorrect_LOL_sam_oxford_2016.png" width="75%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/PCopA_CueR_incorrect_LOL_sam_oxford_2016.png" width="70%" /><figcaption>How BBa_K1758324 should be labelled in the registry based on its underlying sequence</figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
As they are not separated by a transcriptional terminator, transcription beginning from the constitutive promoter could produce mRNA for both CueR and sfGFP.
+
As the two coding regions are not separated by a transcription terminator, there would be read through from the constitutive promoter to the sfGFP and sfGFP would be expressed even in the absence of copper. As no negative control is included in the plate reader graph they provide and no settings provided for their BioLector experiments in their <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Protocols">protocols</a>  it is unclear just how high the expression level at 0mM copper was for this part compared to a negative control strain.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 +
<p>The CueR subpart (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K17583204">BBa_K1758320</a>) making up BBa_K1758324 is also incorrectly labelled.</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
When we designed this part we flipped the CueR and the constitutive promoter to face the opposite direction on the opposite strand. We also had to remove the <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="5'UTR" data-content="The region of mRNA before a protein encoding sequence that is untranslated">5'UTR</a> because it was too AT rich to be synthesised.
+
When we designed this part we flipped the CueR and the constitutive promoter to face the opposite direction on the opposite strand i.e. so they were divergent. We also had to remove the 5'UTR, which Bielefeld found to increase expression, because it was too AT rich to be synthesised.</p>
</p>
+
<p> Unfortunately, every attempt to amplify this part from the synthesised sequence we received from IDT resulted in the same two point mutations in the sfGFP region of this part making it non-functional. To compare this promoter system to the others we designed, we used our parts with chelator-sfGFP fusions instead of the sfGFP which we expected to have similar behaviour.
<p> Unfortunately, every attempt to amplify this part from the synthesised sequence we received from IDT resulted in the same two point mutations in the sfGFP region of this part making it non-functional. To compare this promoter system to the other we designed and used our parts with chelator-sfGFP fusions instead of the sfGFP which we expected to have similar behaviour.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<h3 id="p">pCopA with divergently expressed CueR</h3>
+
<h3 id="p">pCopA with divergent expressed CueR</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
To facilitate making any protein under control of a copper-responsive promoter we designed a part with similar to the above pCopA sfGFP with constitutively expressed CueR but without the sfGFP. The RBS however is still present meaning that any protein with the ATG biobrick prefix and universal suffix can be inserted with biobrick standard assembly with the correct RBS-ATG distance.
+
To facilitate making any protein under control of a copper-responsive promoter we designed a part (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980006">BBa_K1980006</a>) similar to the above pCopA sfGFP with divergent expressed CueR but without the sfGFP. The RBS however is still present meaning that any protein with the ATG biobrick prefix and universal suffix can be inserted with biobrick standard assembly with the correct RBS-ATG distance.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
<h3 id="fcg">pCopA CueR sfGFP/ Feedback pCopA sfGFP</h3>
 
<h3 id="fcg">pCopA CueR sfGFP/ Feedback pCopA sfGFP</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/Fcg_diagram_v1_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/Fcg_diagram_v1_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980008">BBa_K1980008</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
We designed a part similar to the above but with CueR expressed from the same pCopA promoter that it controls in order to study CueR operating under a feedback loop. If CueR is acting as a net activator, this should in theory act as a positive feedback system whereby a small amount of copper stimulation produces more CueR causing greater activation. Should CueR be acting as a net repressor this system would be less sensitive than our previous system and this appears to be what we discovered. </p>
 
We designed a part similar to the above but with CueR expressed from the same pCopA promoter that it controls in order to study CueR operating under a feedback loop. If CueR is acting as a net activator, this should in theory act as a positive feedback system whereby a small amount of copper stimulation produces more CueR causing greater activation. Should CueR be acting as a net repressor this system would be less sensitive than our previous system and this appears to be what we discovered. </p>
Line 233: Line 231:
 
A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/99/Fcg_4h_graph_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/99/Fcg_4h_graph_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980008 after 4 hours </figcaption>
 
<h2 id="CusS-CusR">CusS/CusR linked systems</h2>
 
<h2 id="CusS-CusR">CusS/CusR linked systems</h2>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The second system <i>E. coli</i> uses to respond to copper is the CusS/CusR two-component system. This consists of the transmembrane histidine kinase enzyme CusS in the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and a cytoplasmic response regulator CusR.  
+
The second system <i>E. coli</i> uses to respond to copper is the CusS/CusR two-component system. This consists of the transmembrane histidine kinase enzyme: CusS in the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and a cytoplasmic response regulator: CusR.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 246: Line 244:
  
 
<h3 id="pCusC">pCusC RFP</h3>
 
<h3 id="pCusC">pCusC RFP</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1a/PCusC_mKate_diagram_v1_Sam_Oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1a/PCusC_mKate_diagram_v1_Sam_Oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980007">BBa_K1980007</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
We received a copy of pCusC <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="monomeric Kate2" data-content="A very bright far-red fluorescent protein with excitation/emission maxima at 588 and 633 nm">mKate</a> (a form of RFP) from Tom Folliard, one of the PhD students in our lab. This sequence had a biobrick-illegal Spe1 site in the RBS region meaning we could not deposit in the registry. We performed site directed mutagenesis to swap a C in the Spe1 site for G, and moved it into the shipping vector. This part was then deposited. We also amplified the promoter region only and deposited this separately.  
+
We received a copy of pCusC <a data-toggle="popover1" data-trigger="hover" title="monomeric Kate2" data-content="A very bright far-red fluorescent protein with excitation/emission maxima at 588 and 633 nm">mKate</a> (a form of RFP) from Tom Folliard, one of the PhD students in our lab. This sequence had a biobrick-illegal Spe1 site in the RBS region meaning we could not deposit in the registry. We performed site directed mutagenesis to swap a C in the Spe1 site for G, and moved it into the shipping vector. This part was then deposited. We also amplified the promoter region only and deposited this separately.(<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980004">BBa_K1980004</a>)
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/92/PCusC_RFP_4h_graph_Oxford_Sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/92/PCusC_RFP_4h_graph_Oxford_Sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980007 after 4 hours </figcaption>
  
 
<h3 id="fck">pCusC CusR RFP</h3>
 
<h3 id="fck">pCusC CusR RFP</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b6/Fck_diagram_v2_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b6/Fck_diagram_v2_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980009">BBa_K1980009</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
We also designed a version of the part with CusR expressed before mKate forming a positive feedback loop. This sort of system was shown to be more responsive in a paper by Ravikumar S <i>et al.</i><sup>(5)</sup>. However after many attempts at cloning our only full length construct had a point mutation (Val to Ala) in the <i>CusR</i> gene. We tested this part to see if this mutation was tolerable, but found no evidence for a more sensitive system:
 
We also designed a version of the part with CusR expressed before mKate forming a positive feedback loop. This sort of system was shown to be more responsive in a paper by Ravikumar S <i>et al.</i><sup>(5)</sup>. However after many attempts at cloning our only full length construct had a point mutation (Val to Ala) in the <i>CusR</i> gene. We tested this part to see if this mutation was tolerable, but found no evidence for a more sensitive system:
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b7/Fck_4h_graph_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b7/Fck_4h_graph_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980009 after 4 hours </figcaption>
 
<p>A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
<p>A BspH1 site was included at the start codon of the sfGFP so that other proteins with a compatible start (such as the copper chelators we ligated into our pBAD vector) could be ligated into this location.
 
</p>
 
</p>
Line 269: Line 267:
 
<h3 id="pm">pCopA MymT with divergent expressed CueR</h3>
 
<h3 id="pm">pCopA MymT with divergent expressed CueR</h3>
 
<img src="
 
<img src="
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0f/Pm_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0f/Pm_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980011">BBa_K1980011</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
This part contains the chelator MymT behind a copper sensitive promoter with divergent expressed CueR in the biobrick.  
 
This part contains the chelator MymT behind a copper sensitive promoter with divergent expressed CueR in the biobrick.  
Line 275: Line 273:
  
 
<h3 id="pmg">pCopA MymT sfGFP divergent expressed CueR</h3>
 
<h3 id="pmg">pCopA MymT sfGFP divergent expressed CueR</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/90/Pmg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/90/Pmg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980012">BBa_K1980012</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
This part contains our chelator MymT with a C-terminal sfGFP tag behind the pCopA promoter with divergent expressed CueR in the biobrick.  
 
This part contains our chelator MymT with a C-terminal sfGFP tag behind the pCopA promoter with divergent expressed CueR in the biobrick.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/42/Pmg_4h_graph_sam_oxofrd_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/42/Pmg_4h_graph_sam_oxofrd_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980012 after 4 hours </figcaption>
  
 
<h3 id="ptcg">pCopA TAT Csp1 sfGFP constitutively expressed CueR</h3>
 
<h3 id="ptcg">pCopA TAT Csp1 sfGFP constitutively expressed CueR</h3>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5d/Ptcg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5d/Ptcg_diagram_v1_Oxford_sam_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>The design of part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980010">BBa_K1980010</a></figcaption>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
This part contains our chelator Csp1 with a C-terminal sfGFP tag behind the pCopA promoter with constitutively expressed CueR in the biobrick. Likely due to the expression problems of Csp1 it responded worse than the similar part above with our MymTsfGFP fusion protein.
 
This part contains our chelator Csp1 with a C-terminal sfGFP tag behind the pCopA promoter with constitutively expressed CueR in the biobrick. Likely due to the expression problems of Csp1 it responded worse than the similar part above with our MymTsfGFP fusion protein.
 
</p>
 
</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/97/Ptcg_graph_4h_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/97/Ptcg_graph_4h_sam_oxford_2016.jpeg" width="50%" /><figcaption>Plate reader data for BBa_K1980010 after 4 hours </figcaption>
 
</section>
 
</section>
  

Latest revision as of 16:53, 3 November 2016

iGEM Oxford 2016 - Cure for Copper