Difference between revisions of "Team:Goettingen/HP/Gold"

Line 51: Line 51:
 
<div class="text">
 
<div class="text">
 
    
 
    
<h1> Human Practices </h1>  
+
<h1> Gold </h1>  
 
    
 
    
 
   </div> <!-- close text div -->
 
   </div> <!-- close text div -->
Line 64: Line 64:
  
 
<div class="text">
 
<div class="text">
<div class="column full_size">
+
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
 +
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
 +
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Medals">human practices gold medal criterion</a>. </p>
 +
 
  
<p>iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
+
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal. See more information at <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards/Instructions"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
+
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>.</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
<div class="column half_size">
 
<div class="highlight">
 
<h5>Note</h5>
 
<p>You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Awards">awards</a> for Human Practices:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Human Practices silver medal criterion</li>
 
<li>Human Practices gold medal criterion</li>
 
<li>Best Integrated Human Practices award</li>
 
<li>Best Education and Public Engagement award</li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
<div class="column full_size">
<h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
+
<ul>
+
<li>Philosophy</li>
+
<li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
+
<li>Education</li>
+
<li>Product Design</li>
+
<li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
+
<li>Environmental Impact</li>
+
<li>Ethics</li>
+
<li>Safety</li>
+
<li>Security</li>
+
<li>Public Policy</li>
+
<li>Law and Regulation</li>
+
<li>Risk Assessment</li>
+
</ul>
+
</div>
+
  
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
<p>iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
+
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
<p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).</p>
+
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>.</p>
</div>
+
  
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
<p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
  
 
</div> <!-- close row div -->
 
</div> <!-- close row div -->

Revision as of 13:29, 29 August 2016


Gold

★ ALERT!

This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the human practices gold medal criterion.

Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.

iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.

Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.

For more information, please see the Human Practices Hub.