Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Model"

Line 72: Line 72:
  
 
<h5 id="rossbio">
 
<h5 id="rossbio">
The short version…….
+
Instead of running your model once with some specific parameters (for example rate constants.), you find all the possible parameters in literature and run your model for lots of combinations sampled in a clever way. By doing this you take take into account the uncertainty in the parameters. You will create probabilistic outputs allowing you to make rigorous conclusions.
Instead of running your model once with some specific parameters, you find all the possible parameters in literature and run your model for lots of combinations in a clever way. By doing this you take into account the uncertainty in your parameters and as such make meaningful conclusions. An example of this is what is your exact reaction scheme, you can run these simulations for different models and see which can be consistent with experimental data. Furthermore by testing your specific parameters set fit to data you can find out what values work and relationships between your parameters, better understanding them and providing physical insight.  
+
            <br /><br />
 +
Following through our flow diagram blueprint should make this concept clear.
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
Line 82: Line 83:
  
 
<h5 id="nickbio">
 
<h5 id="nickbio">
We focused on modelling the cell free mechanism. See the experimental section for details, but essentially, Alcohol, alcohol oxidase, horseradish peroxidase  and abts are mixed together making oxidised abts which is colourful, click here to see the potential reaction schemes. Click here to be taken to a detailed explanation in the experimental section.
+
We focused on modelling the cell free mechanism, see the experimental section for details. The short version is the alcopatch relies on Alcohol, AOx, hrp and abts are mixed together making oxidised abts which is colourful. The process will work for any model however and this was chosen as a simpler example to demonstrate the technique, focusing on the process rather than the system itself.
The process will work for any model however and this was chosen as a simpler example to demonstrate the technique.
+
 
 
</h5>
 
</h5>
  
Line 94: Line 95:
 
Firstly we narrowed down the potential reaction schemes and increased our knowledge of our rate constants.
 
Firstly we narrowed down the potential reaction schemes and increased our knowledge of our rate constants.
 
Secondly we have created a blueprint for using ensemble modelling instead of simple ODE modelling in the hope that it can become standard practice for iGEM.  
 
Secondly we have created a blueprint for using ensemble modelling instead of simple ODE modelling in the hope that it can become standard practice for iGEM.  
 +
      <br /><br />
 +
All the modeling and experimental work for mechanism 1 was done using Glucose and GOx instead, this was due to laboratory limitations. This effects the modelling analysis in trying to predict things about alcohol which came from human practices. The equivalent analysis was done for glucose. Rerunning the analysis for alcohol would only require the change of some constants, so the analysis acts as a proof of concept and still shows the integration of human practices.
 
</h5
 
</h5
  

Revision as of 09:39, 16 October 2016

Manchester iGEM 2016
Modelling Banner

Welcome to our modelling section. We have used a novel ensemble modeling approach, to better aid the synergy between wetalb and dry lab teams. On this page you will find short answers to the questions; What is ensemble modelling? What did we model? what did our model achieve?

For navigating the wiki you need to know that the sections on results and human practice/lab integration can be accessed in the menu bar.

Part of what we hope to achieve with this ensemble methodology is a blueprint for other igem teams. As such each step in creating and using our model is laid out in the below diagram. Clicking on a specific step will take you to a page explaining the theory. Going deeper you can access a discussion of the code. There will be a link to the relevant parts of our github (a website storing our code) Use these codes as you wish.

Link to github homepage

Ross photo

Instead of running your model once with some specific parameters (for example rate constants.), you find all the possible parameters in literature and run your model for lots of combinations sampled in a clever way. By doing this you take take into account the uncertainty in the parameters. You will create probabilistic outputs allowing you to make rigorous conclusions.

Following through our flow diagram blueprint should make this concept clear.
Nick photo

We focused on modelling the cell free mechanism, see the experimental section for details. The short version is the alcopatch relies on Alcohol, AOx, hrp and abts are mixed together making oxidised abts which is colourful. The process will work for any model however and this was chosen as a simpler example to demonstrate the technique, focusing on the process rather than the system itself.
Marc photo

Firstly we narrowed down the potential reaction schemes and increased our knowledge of our rate constants. Secondly we have created a blueprint for using ensemble modelling instead of simple ODE modelling in the hope that it can become standard practice for iGEM.

All the modeling and experimental work for mechanism 1 was done using Glucose and GOx instead, this was due to laboratory limitations. This effects the modelling analysis in trying to predict things about alcohol which came from human practices. The equivalent analysis was done for glucose. Rerunning the analysis for alcohol would only require the change of some constants, so the analysis acts as a proof of concept and still shows the integration of human practices.

We found great inspiration from our human practices and guidance working both ways to the experiments. Click here to see the detail.