Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Judging"

Line 128: Line 128:
 
     <li>Without the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Collaborations" target="_blank"> collaboration</a> with other iGEM teams, our project would not have been successful. Thank you!</li>
 
     <li>Without the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Collaborations" target="_blank"> collaboration</a> with other iGEM teams, our project would not have been successful. Thank you!</li>
 
   <img class="tick" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b4/T--Manchester--Tick_Sliver.png" alt="Tick" />
 
   <img class="tick" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b4/T--Manchester--Tick_Sliver.png" alt="Tick" />
     <li>We reached out to various stakeholders, charities, public services and many others to make sure our device addresses real-world needs in a responsible and efficient way</li>
+
     <li>Reached out to various <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Human_Practices" target="_blank"> stakeholders, charities, public services</a> and many others to make sure our device addresses real-world needs in a responsible and efficient way.</li>
  
 
   </ul>   
 
   </ul>   

Revision as of 22:26, 16 October 2016

Manchester iGEM 2016


Judging Criteria

Bronze Trophy
Bronze Trophy
Bronze Trophy
    Tick
  • Check out how our project ideas have developed just by talking to various stakeholders, charities, public services and many others
  • Tick
  • We improved an existing BioBrick by adding two missing restriction sites – XbaI and SpeI making assembly process easier
  • Tick
  • We characterised previously existing BioBricks BBa_K1033923 and BBa_K592009
  • Tick
  • We created a functional prototype of our device to show colour changes in the presence of ethanol