Jhmitchell (Talk | contribs) |
Jhmitchell (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
make up the circuit in question [1]. | make up the circuit in question [1]. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p class='large' style="padding-left:70px;"> | + | <p class='large' style="padding-left:70px; padding-bottom:50px;"> |
The other foundational limitation of genetic circuit construction addresses the inefficiency and | The other foundational limitation of genetic circuit construction addresses the inefficiency and | ||
unpredictability of the design and construction process itself. The progression from synthesizing parts | unpredictability of the design and construction process itself. The progression from synthesizing parts | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
<div class="col-md-4"> | <div class="col-md-4"> | ||
<div class="title add-animation-stopped"> | <div class="title add-animation-stopped"> | ||
− | <p class='h2WM' style='padding-left:70px | + | <p class='h2WM' style='padding-left:70px;'> |
The Project | The Project | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 09:42, 19 October 2016
Motivation
Genetic circuits exist in great abundance in nature as complex metabolic pathways which interact
in various ways to perform vital cellular processes. Synthetic biologists aim to not only understand
naturally occurring circuit networks, but also to modify them or to conceptualize and build entirely
new circuits.
The inherent versatility of synthetic genetic circuitry has lead to a vast array of diverse applications
in countless fields. However, the field remains fundamentally limited by the magnitude and specificity of
behavioral control over genetic circuits and circuit networks. These limitations can be boiled down to two
essential problems: inherent constraints to behavior based on the nature of a circuit’s constituent genes,
and the inefficiency of the “design-build-test” cycle which is relied upon for the construction of effective
circuit models.
The fundamental constraints of integral circuit components limit the ability to design and construct
genetic circuits of arbitrary and highly specific behavior. When constructing a circuit with some intended
behavior, design is limited by the available input-specific regulators to gene expression and their
characteristic regulatory behavior. In order to achieve more precise behavioral control, the ability to
tune expression levels of regulatory elements to some desired level is vital. This limitation highlights
the need for genetic devices that can modify the behavior of arbitrary genetic circuits; implementing these
devices would enable precise behavioral control invariant to the constraints of the constituent genes that
make up the circuit in question [1].
The other foundational limitation of genetic circuit construction addresses the inefficiency and
unpredictability of the design and construction process itself. The progression from synthesizing parts
into a circuit on a plasmid, to transformation and testing in vivo, is a lengthy and expensive process
which furthermore is largely variable in terms of actual functionality of the final product [2].This often
leads to a series of trial-and-error testing cycles whose products maintain a persistent level of uncertainty
with regard to precise, predictable behavior. Although it is possible to achieve functional genetic circuits
in this capacity, greater problems arise regarding the tunability of the product. The success of any genetic
circuit relies on the ability to precisely tune a response to a range of input concentrations; it would therefore
be desirable to obtain a reliable method for tuning circuit response, ideally without the need to rewire the
internal workings of the circuit. This method would allow control over output expression to be implemented in
a more rapid and predictable manner [3].
The Project
Our project aims to provide a modular collection of genetic parts which can specifically and predictably
tune the behavior of an arbitrary genetic circuit. This collection, which we have dubbed the “Circuit
Control Toolbox,” consists of a suite of parts which can be added to the end of a given genetic circuit;
each part provides a specific and independently tunable response which allows direct control over the
ultimate output behavior of the circuit.
The overall input/output behavior of any genetic circuit can be represented by a graph known as a
transfer function, which relates concentration of input molecule to output protein expression.
Likewise, any modifications to the circuit affecting input/output behavior can be visualized by a
transformation of the transfer function representing the circuit. The Circuit Control Toolbox consists
of three distinct tools which prompt unique behavioral changes to the circuit’s output relative to its
input, and therefore generate different transformations of the circuit’s original transfer function.
Description