m |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div class="container text_header"><h1>Selection</h1></div> | <div class="container text_header"><h1>Selection</h1></div> | ||
<div class="container text_header"><h3>Motivation</h3></div> | <div class="container text_header"><h3>Motivation</h3></div> | ||
− | <div class="container text"> | + | <div class="container text"> Selection is a key mechanism of evolution like Darwin defined it. Biodiversity and life as we know it in all its complexity is scientificly not explicable without it. We wanted to design a system able to generate an Evobody that can gain affinity towards any target protein it is confronted with. So what better way is there to design our system than copying one of evolutions core principles and letting the bacteria with the best Evobody emerge by itself?<br> |
Having a library of Evobodies as well as a mutation system is a great way to guarantee a high variety of binding proteins. | Having a library of Evobodies as well as a mutation system is a great way to guarantee a high variety of binding proteins. | ||
However, there is still the need of a screening method to separate Evobodies that show affinity to the target protein from those | However, there is still the need of a screening method to separate Evobodies that show affinity to the target protein from those | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
approaches to screen for functional Evobodies: | approaches to screen for functional Evobodies: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="container text_header"><h3>Overview</h3></div> |
<img align="right" class="img-responsive" src="pictures/2-Hybrid-Darstellung.jpg" width=25% /> | <img align="right" class="img-responsive" src="pictures/2-Hybrid-Darstellung.jpg" width=25% /> | ||
The <a href="#">bacterial two-hybrid system</a>, our main approach, consists of two fusion proteins and a reporter gene that grants selective advantage. One | The <a href="#">bacterial two-hybrid system</a>, our main approach, consists of two fusion proteins and a reporter gene that grants selective advantage. One |
Revision as of 20:36, 19 October 2016
Selection
Motivation
Selection is a key mechanism of evolution like Darwin defined it. Biodiversity and life as we know it in all its complexity is scientificly not explicable without it. We wanted to design a system able to generate an Evobody that can gain affinity towards any target protein it is confronted with. So what better way is there to design our system than copying one of evolutions core principles and letting the bacteria with the best Evobody emerge by itself?
Having a library of Evobodies as well as a mutation system is a great way to guarantee a high variety of binding proteins. However, there is still the need of a screening method to separate Evobodies that show affinity to the target protein from those that do not. As we wanted our whole system to work in vivo utilizing directed evolution we settled for three different approaches to screen for functional Evobodies:
The bacterial two-hybrid system, our main approach, consists of two fusion proteins and a reporter gene that grants selective advantage. One
fusion protein is the target protein fused to a DNA-binding domain while the other comprises the Evobody consisting of a binding protein with a RNA polymerase subunit. The
DNA-binding domain that is connected to the target protein binds upstream of the reporter gene, in our case coding for beta-lactamase.
If there is a certain affinity between the Evobody and the target protein, the polymerase subunit of the Evobody recruits the full enzyme and subsequently the beta-lactamase
is expressed. Cultivated in an increasing concentration of ampicillin, only those bacteria expressing enough beta-lactamase will prevail. Since the expression
of beta-lactamase correlates to the affinity between Evobody and binding protein we can use the best grown bacteria to determine the sequence of the Evobody
which then could be used for production.
The split-protein approach is also based on beta-lactamase as a resistance to ampicillin. The general idea is, to split a reporter protein
into two non-functional subunits. Then, a translational fusion between one half of the split-protein respectively and one of the two allegedly binding proteins
is created. In case of succesful binding between the proteins, the fused split-protein halfes should therefore restore the functional reporter protein. As afore mentioned we
decided for beta-lactamase as a reporter since it allows for the application of selective pressure. Each, the Evobody and the target protein, are fused to a different
half of the split-beta-lactamase. In case of a successful binding Evobody the bacterium in concern should be granted an ampicillin resistance due to a restored and
functional beta-lactamase.
The TAT-hitchhiker selection works on a similar premise as the split-protein. But in this case the beta-lactamase is not divided into two subunits
but instead its natural export signals are removed. this modified beta-lactamase forms a translational unit with the target protein whilst a signal peptide
for the Tat (Twin-Arginine Translocation) pathway is attached to the Evobody. Only in case of a funtionally binding Evobody to the target protein is the
beta-lactamase exported into the periplasm where it can counteract the ampicillin. Since the Tat pathway only exports correctly folded proteins, this approach also
provides an option to check if the proteins are expressed as we hope they are.
In summary, we wanted a selection system to screen for Evobodies with high affinity to the target protein while being functional in vivo. We chose three approaches, the bacterial two-hybrid system, the split-protein approach and the TAT-hitchhiker selection.
References follow soon!
Having a library of Evobodies as well as a mutation system is a great way to guarantee a high variety of binding proteins. However, there is still the need of a screening method to separate Evobodies that show affinity to the target protein from those that do not. As we wanted our whole system to work in vivo utilizing directed evolution we settled for three different approaches to screen for functional Evobodies:
Overview
![](pictures/2-Hybrid-Darstellung.jpg)
![](pictures/Split-Protein-Darstellung.jpg)
![](pictures/Hitchhiker-Darstellung.jpg)
In summary, we wanted a selection system to screen for Evobodies with high affinity to the target protein while being functional in vivo. We chose three approaches, the bacterial two-hybrid system, the split-protein approach and the TAT-hitchhiker selection.
References follow soon!