Producing microlenses with bacteria

The essential activity that our Escherichia coli needs to perfom to create biolenses surround itself by a glass layer. This is done by a special enzyme, silicatein-α, which is original from sponges and produces polysilicate from monomeric silicic acid. To make sure that the cell is coated by polysilicate we engineered a fusion protein combining the silicatein-α gene from Tethya aurantia to the membrane protein OmpA (Outer membrane protein A) from E. coli (Part K1890002).

We expressed this construct under the control of an inducible promoter (Lac-promoter), which was present in the plasmid backbone we used, together with the LacI gene. This backbone was obtained from pBbA5c-RFP, a gift from Jay Keasling (Addgene plasmid # 35281) (Lee et al., 2011). Upon transformation of this plasmid in BL21 E. coli cells and after induction with IPTG and supplementing the growth medium with silicic acid (the substrate for silicatein to produce the polysilicate layer), our cells were covered by a polysilicate layer as shown by Rhodamine 123 staining (a specific stain for polysilicate (Figure 1), TEM and AFM.

Rhodamine 123 staining

In figure 1 we can see that the strain transformed with OmpA-silicatein clearly has a different output from the negative control. The fluorescence of this sample is only localized at the cells. This might mean that the Rhodamine 123 has stained these cells and therefore the OmpA-silicatein cells could have the polysilicate layer around their membranes.

Imaging of silicatein-expressing cells and their elemental composition using TEM

Our cells expressing the OmpA-silicatein construct were imaged using HAAFD-TEM and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (figure 2). For this, a negative control of induced cells not supplemented with silicic acid was used. In figure 2A and 2C the white structure is a cell laying on a hole in the grid. In each sample, we measured elemental composition of our sample including the silicon content (figure 2 B,D) the blue spots in these images indicate where silicon is detected. The grid itself already contains silicon but in the holes of the grid no silicon is present (figure 2 B,D). Therefore, we only measured the presence of silicon in bacteria laying on a hole on in the grid to make sure we do not have background silicon signal from the grid, which cannot be distinguished from the actual signal.

For the sample where no silicic acid is added (figure 2 A,B), we can see some silicon present at the position of the cell. However, there is a significant increase in silicon detected for the sample where silicic acid was added to the sample (figure 2D). This shows that silicon co-localizes with the cell which means there is indeed a polysilicate layer formed by the bacteria.

Analysis of physical properties of polysilicate covered cells using AFM

We have imaged the two samples from TEM also with AFM. From both samples a height map (figure 3A, C) and the stiffness (figure 3B, D) was determined. Both samples were fixed on a glass slide in the same way. Due to a tip change is there a factor 10 difference between the measured stiffness of the glass slide of both samples.

Multiple cells (n=3) were imaged and the relative stiffness of the cell compared to the stiffness of the glass slide was determined (figure 3E). We found that cells covered with a layer of polysilicate have a stiffness of 0.43 compared to the glass slide and the cells without a layer of polysilicate have a stiffness of 0.16 compared to the glass slide. We can see that due to the encapsulation of the cells in polysilicate the stiffness of the cells increases significantly.