Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<u><div class="container text_header"><h4>Organisation:</h4></div></u> | <u><div class="container text_header"><h4>Organisation:</h4></div></u> | ||
The management structure of our company will contain all necessary assignments while keeping it simple to avoid unnecessary costs. | The management structure of our company will contain all necessary assignments while keeping it simple to avoid unnecessary costs. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> | ||
Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
The developmentof a flowchart of our process and procedures supports the inital overview on our project. Furthermore, this overview is a major requirement to successfully upscale our idea and bring it into actual use for researchers and diagnosticians all over the world. Therefore, we talked to several experts in large scale production within biotechnology. Results from these discussions were transferred to our procedures to reach a bigger scale. One major issue was identified easily: the whole process would be too complex. Therefore, the two central processes of generating of the Evobody encoding sequence and the final production of the Evobody itself are presented in separate flowcharts to present our unique system of in vivo mutagenesis and selection. | The developmentof a flowchart of our process and procedures supports the inital overview on our project. Furthermore, this overview is a major requirement to successfully upscale our idea and bring it into actual use for researchers and diagnosticians all over the world. Therefore, we talked to several experts in large scale production within biotechnology. Results from these discussions were transferred to our procedures to reach a bigger scale. One major issue was identified easily: the whole process would be too complex. Therefore, the two central processes of generating of the Evobody encoding sequence and the final production of the Evobody itself are presented in separate flowcharts to present our unique system of in vivo mutagenesis and selection. | ||
Our starting point is the main procedure that gives an overview makes up the skeleton of our project. It describes the steps that are necessary to get to the generation of an Evobody sequence and how to continue after the production of the Evobody itself. It involves the procedures that are applied when an order for a new target is issued up to the finished product that is then send out (Fig. 1). | Our starting point is the main procedure that gives an overview makes up the skeleton of our project. It describes the steps that are necessary to get to the generation of an Evobody sequence and how to continue after the production of the Evobody itself. It involves the procedures that are applied when an order for a new target is issued up to the finished product that is then send out (Fig. 1). | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> | ||
Line 79: | Line 81: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Second is the generation of an Evobody sequence that shows the greatest binding properties to our target. This is achieved with our system. It involves the generation of the library, the system for mutating the sequence of the Evobody and the constant selection for the best binder. | Second is the generation of an Evobody sequence that shows the greatest binding properties to our target. This is achieved with our system. It involves the generation of the library, the system for mutating the sequence of the Evobody and the constant selection for the best binder. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> | ||
Line 86: | Line 89: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Last but not least is the actual process of producing our Evobody, the extraction and cleanup of the Evobody before it can be shipped. It starts with the amplification of the sequence for the best binder that is the result of the second process and ends with the purified and stabilized binding protein. Our Evobody. | Last but not least is the actual process of producing our Evobody, the extraction and cleanup of the Evobody before it can be shipped. It starts with the amplification of the sequence for the best binder that is the result of the second process and ends with the purified and stabilized binding protein. Our Evobody. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> | ||
Line 95: | Line 99: | ||
The most in important thing is that the process of creating of the best binder, our Evobody, is still rather small and can be done on the level of a single lab. But when it comes to producing the actual binder a large scale fermentation process is needed for production in large quantities. We discussed two approaches: a repeated batch and a continuous culture, respectively. The repeated batch is easier and we have no dilution, for example antibiotics, over time. In the continuous batch we face a lower my which means constant pressure on the cells, it is reproducible and we have constant conditions during the production . | The most in important thing is that the process of creating of the best binder, our Evobody, is still rather small and can be done on the level of a single lab. But when it comes to producing the actual binder a large scale fermentation process is needed for production in large quantities. We discussed two approaches: a repeated batch and a continuous culture, respectively. The repeated batch is easier and we have no dilution, for example antibiotics, over time. In the continuous batch we face a lower my which means constant pressure on the cells, it is reproducible and we have constant conditions during the production . | ||
Suggested cultivation time was between 10 to 12 generations. Also adding another carbon source like glucose or glycerin ( that does not need autoclavation) is improving the yield and reducing the cost. Using a defined medium would just elongate the process in terms of analysis, control and preparation measures. Considering the generation of the sequence of the perfect binder the culture should be harvested in the stationary phase, because there is the peak in plasmid DNA. | Suggested cultivation time was between 10 to 12 generations. Also adding another carbon source like glucose or glycerin ( that does not need autoclavation) is improving the yield and reducing the cost. Using a defined medium would just elongate the process in terms of analysis, control and preparation measures. Considering the generation of the sequence of the perfect binder the culture should be harvested in the stationary phase, because there is the peak in plasmid DNA. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> |
Revision as of 13:23, 19 October 2016
Entrepreneurship
Businessplan
Idea:
Market and competition:
Goals:
Strategy:
Marketing:
Organisation:
We will mostly employ molecular biologists, biotechnologists and biotechnical assistants. The most advantageous location would be an enterprise zone because of good accessibility to highways and thus faster transportation.
Law:
Finances:
SWOT- analysis:
Executive summary:
1 http://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesforyou/consumers/ucm143534.htm
Development Process
Second is the generation of an Evobody sequence that shows the greatest binding properties to our target. This is achieved with our system. It involves the generation of the library, the system for mutating the sequence of the Evobody and the constant selection for the best binder.
Last but not least is the actual process of producing our Evobody, the extraction and cleanup of the Evobody before it can be shipped. It starts with the amplification of the sequence for the best binder that is the result of the second process and ends with the purified and stabilized binding protein. Our Evobody.
In order to transfer our project to an industrial level we had to compare the differences between the scales of processes in production and a research group, respectively. For the process of upscaling we consulted different experts from different fields: Prof. Dr. Karl Friehs (fermentation), Prof Dr. Thomas Noll (cell culture), Dr. Joe Max Risse (fermentation) and Dr. Martin Schleef (Plasmid Factory ). Our main concerns were the approval by the government institutions and the efficient production of our Evobody protein. This takes the method of cultivation as well as the materials used into consideration. The most in important thing is that the process of creating of the best binder, our Evobody, is still rather small and can be done on the level of a single lab. But when it comes to producing the actual binder a large scale fermentation process is needed for production in large quantities. We discussed two approaches: a repeated batch and a continuous culture, respectively. The repeated batch is easier and we have no dilution, for example antibiotics, over time. In the continuous batch we face a lower my which means constant pressure on the cells, it is reproducible and we have constant conditions during the production . Suggested cultivation time was between 10 to 12 generations. Also adding another carbon source like glucose or glycerin ( that does not need autoclavation) is improving the yield and reducing the cost. Using a defined medium would just elongate the process in terms of analysis, control and preparation measures. Considering the generation of the sequence of the perfect binder the culture should be harvested in the stationary phase, because there is the peak in plasmid DNA.
Therefore, when using a repeated batch letting only the last batch grow into the stationary phase would speed up the process as well as the yield. The type of E. coli used in production is also crucial. A fast growing and well characterized strain has to be used in order to speed up production as well as approval. Also strain characteristics with our plasmids transformed have to be determined to further optimize the system. Another hurdle we had to consider was the approval by the government institutions. They differentiate between generics and biosimilars. Generics are a complete synthetic copy and thus the approval is shortened for its effect and side effects are already known. However, biosimialars root from a different amino acid sequence but the same target as the original. Because we are changing the sequence in search for the best binder, we fall into the second category. That means we have to go through all phases of testing. Aside from the pharmaceutical field our Evobodies can be freely used in research. In research our advantage is that it is in silico which means fast, flexible and a guaranteed outcome. Therefore research labs can instantly react to new or mutated pathogens. Additionally they can focus on how they plan to kill the pathogen instead of spending valuable time on finding ways to bind the target. Their possibilities are large because of the high stability of our Evobody various enzymes and proteins can be fused to it.