Difference between revisions of "Team:Manchester/Human Practices"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="summary"> | <div class="summary"> | ||
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Human_Practices"> | <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Manchester/Human_Practices"> | ||
| − | <div class="fixed"> | + | <div class="fixed column quarter_size"> |
<div class="cog250 blue250" > | <div class="cog250 blue250" > | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 5 September 2016
HUMAN PRACTICES
Some sentnece. (this is the setting for mobile, for website do it later.)
More information
More information
iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.
Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.
For more information, please see the Human Practices Hub.
Note
You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all awards for Human Practices:
- Human Practices silver medal criterion
- Human Practices gold medal criterion
- Best Integrated Human Practices award
- Best Education and Public Engagement award
Some Human Practices topic areas
- Philosophy
- Public Engagement / Dialogue
- Education
- Product Design
- Scale-Up and Deployment Issues
- Environmental Impact
- Ethics
- Safety
- Security
- Public Policy
- Law and Regulation
- Risk Assessment
What should we write about on this page?
On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).
