Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<h3 class="link"><a href="#requirements"><font size="2.7"> 4-1. Requirements</font></a></h3> | <h3 class="link"><a href="#requirements"><font size="2.7"> 4-1. Requirements</font></a></h3> | ||
<h3 class="link"><a href="#prince_coli"><font size="2.7"> 4-2. the Prince <span style ="font-style : italic">coli</span> should be put in in the middle</font></a></h3> | <h3 class="link"><a href="#prince_coli"><font size="2.7"> 4-2. the Prince <span style ="font-style : italic">coli</span> should be put in in the middle</font></a></h3> | ||
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="prhl"><font size="2.7"> 4-3. Prhl should be changed</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#prhl"><font size="2.7"> 4-3. Prhl should be changed</font></a></h3> |
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="production_ahl"><font size="2.7"> 4-4. Production rate of C4HSL and 3OC12HSL by RhlI and LasI</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#production_ahl"><font size="2.7"> 4-4. Production rate of C4HSL and 3OC12HSL by RhlI and LasI</font></a></h3> |
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="translation"><font size="2.7"> 4-5. Translation rate of protein</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#translation"><font size="2.7"> 4-5. Translation rate of protein</font></a></h3> |
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="decomposition"><font size="2.7"> 4-6. Decomposition rate of O3C12HSL by AmiE</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#decomposition"><font size="2.7"> 4-6. Decomposition rate of O3C12HSL by AmiE</font></a></h3> |
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="degradation_amie"><font size="2.7"> 4-6. Degradation rate of AmiE</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#degradation_amie"><font size="2.7"> 4-6. Degradation rate of AmiE</font></a></h3> |
− | <h3 class="link"><a href="degradation_protein"><font size="2.7"> 4-7. Degradation rate of RFP and GFP</font></a></h3> | + | <h3 class="link"><a href="#degradation_protein"><font size="2.7"> 4-7. Degradation rate of RFP and GFP</font></a></h3> |
<h3 class="link"><a href="#software">5. Software</a></h3> | <h3 class="link"><a href="#software">5. Software</a></h3> | ||
<h3 class="link"><a href="#abstract"><font size="2.7"> 5-1. Abstract</font></a></h3> | <h3 class="link"><a href="#abstract"><font size="2.7"> 5-1. Abstract</font></a></h3> |
Revision as of 06:45, 18 October 2016
Model
Contents
1. Overview
To reproduce the story of ”Snow White”, we have designed the cell-cell communication system with improved or characterized parts and collected data from comprehensive experiments. Furthermore, we constructed the mathematical model in order to simulate the behavior of the whole system and to confirm the feasibility of our story. This simulation successfully contributed to give the suggestions to wet lab experiments and confirm the feasibility of our system. In addition, in order to utilize TA (Toxin-Antitoxin) system, we developed a new software in Java for adjusting the number of ACA sequences, which MazF dimer recognizes and cleaves in mRNAs.
2. Story Simulation
2-1. Mathematical Model
To simulate our gene circuits, we developed an ordinary differential equation model.
[Detailed Description for Modeling]
Differencial Equations
Snow White
\begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{RFP}]}{dt} = k - d[mRNA_{RFP}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{RFP}}})[mRNA_{RFP}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{RhlI}]}{dt} = leak_{P_{lux}} + \frac{\kappa_{Lux}[C12]^{n_{Lux}}}{K_{mLux}^{n_{Lux}} + [C12]^{n_{Lux}}} - d[mRNA_{RhlI}] - F_{DiMazF}f[mRNA_{RhlI}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[RFP]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{RFP}] - d_{RFP}[RFP] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[RhlI]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{RhlI}] - d_{RhlI}[RhlI] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[C4]}{dt} = p_{C4}[RhlI]P_{Snow White} - d_{C4}[C4] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{MazF}]}{dt} = leak_{P_{lux}} + \frac{\kappa_{Lux}[C12]^{n_{Lux}}}{K_{mLux}^{n_{Lux}}+ [C12]^{n_{Lux}}} \\ - d[mRNA_{MazF}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{MazF}}})[mRNA_{MazF}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{MazE}]}{dt} = k - d[mRNA_{MazE}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{MazE}}})[mRNA_{MazE}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazF]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{MazF}] - 2k_{Di_{MazF}}[MazF] + 2k_{-Di_{MazF}}[DiMazF] - d_{MazF}[MazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[DiMazF]}{dt} = k_{Di_{MazF}}[MazF] - k_{-Di_{MazF}}[DiMazF] - 2k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 \\ + 2k_{-Hexa}[MazHexamer] - d_{DiMazF}[DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazE]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{MazE}] - 2k_{Di_{MazE}}[MazE] + 2k_{-Di_{MazE}}[DiMazE] - d_{MazE}[MazE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[DiMazE]}{dt} = k_{Di_{MazE}}[MazE] - k_{-Di_{MazE}}[DiMazE] - k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 \\ + k_{-Hexa}[MazHexamer] - d_{DiMazE}[DiMazE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazHexa]}{dt} = k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 - k_{-Hexa}[MazHexa] - d_{Hexa}[MazHexa] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{dP_{Snow White}}{dt} = g \frac{E_{DiMazF}}{E_{DiMazF}+[DiMazF]}\left(1- \frac{P_{Snow White}+P_{Queen}+P_{Prince}}{P_{max}} \right) P_{Snow White} \end{equation}Queen
\begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{GFP}]}{dt} = k - d[mRNA_{GFP}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{GFP}}})[mRNA_{GFP}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{LasI}]}{dt} = leak_{P_{rhl}} + \frac{\kappa_{Rhl}[C4]^{n_{Rhl}}}{K_{mRhl}^{n_{Rhl}} + [C4]^{n_{Rhl}}} \\ - d[mRNA_{LasI}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{LasI}}})[mRNA_{LasI}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[GFP]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{GFP}] - d_{GFP}[GFP] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[LasI]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{LasI}] - d_{LasI}[LasI] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[C12]}{dt} = p_{C12}[LasI]P_{Queen} - d_{C12}[C12] - D[C12][AmiE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{MazF}]}{dt} = leak_{P_{lux}} + \frac{\kappa_{Rhl}[C4]^{n_{Rhl}}}{K_{mRhl}^{n_{Rhl}} + [C4]^{n_{Rhl}}} \\ - d[mRNA_{MazF}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{MazF}}})[mRNA_{MazF}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{MazE}]}{dt} = k - d[mRNA_{MazE}] - F_{DiMazF}(1-(1-f)^{f_{mRNA_{MazE}}})[mRNA_{MazE}][DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazF]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{MazF}] - 2k_{Di_{MazF}}[MazF] + 2k_{-Di_{MazF}}[DiMazF] - d_{MazF}[MazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[DiMazF]}{dt} = k_{Di_{MazF}}[MazF] - k_{-Di_{MazF}}[DiMazF] - 2k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 \\ + 2k_{-Hexa}[MazHexamer] - d_{DiMazF}[DiMazF] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazE]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{MazE}] - 2k_{Di_{MazE}}[MazE] + 2k_{-Di_{MazE}}[DiMazE] - d_{MazE}[MazE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[DiMazE]}{dt} = k_{Di_{MazE}}[MazE] - k_{-Di_{MazE}}[DiMazE] - k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 \\ + k_{-Hexa}[MazHexamer] - d_{DiMazE}[DiMazE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[MazHexa]}{dt} = k_{Hexa}[DiMazE][DiMazF]^2 - k_{-Hexa}[MazHexa] - d_{Hexa}[MazHexa] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{dP_{Queen}}{dt} = g \frac{E_{DiMazF}}{E_{DiMazF}+[DiMazF]}\left(1- \frac{P_{Snow White}+P_{Queen}+P_{Prince}}{P_{max}}\right) P_{Queen}\\ \end{equation}Prince
\begin{equation} \frac{d[mRNA_{AmiE}]}{dt} = leak_{P_{lux}} + \frac{\kappa_{Lux}[C12]^n}{K_{mLux}^n + [C12]^n} - d[mRNA_{AmiE}] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{d[AmiE]}{dt} = \alpha [mRNA_{AmiE}]P_{Prince} - d_{AmiE}[AmiE] \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{dP_{Prince}}{dt} = g\left(1- \frac{P_{Snow White}+P_{Queen}+P_{Prince}}{P_{max}}\right) P_{Prince} \end{equation}Explanation about Parameters
Parameter | Description |
$$g$$ | Growth rate of each cells |
$$P_{max}$$ | Carrying capacity |
$$E_{DiMazF}$$ | Effect of MazF dimer on growth rate |
$$k$$ | Transcription rate of mRNA under \(P_{tet}\) |
$$leak_{P_{lux}}$$ | Leakage of \(P_{lux}\) |
$$leak_{P_{rhl}}$$ | Leakage of \(P_{rhl}\) |
$$\kappa_{Lux}$$ | Maximum transcription rate of mRNA under \(P_{lux}\) |
$$\kappa_{Rhl}$$ | Maximum transcription rate of mRNA under \(P_{rhl}\) |
$$n_{Lux}$$ | Hill coefficient for \(P_{lux}\) |
$$n_{Rhl}$$ | Hill coefficient for \(P_{rhl}\) |
$$K_{mLux}$$ | Lumped paremeter for the Lux System |
$$K_{mRhl}$$ | Lumped paremeter for the Rhl System |
$$F_{DiMazF}$$ | Cutting rate at ACA sequences on mRNA by MazF dimer |
$$f$$ | The probability of distinction of ACA sequencess in each mRNA |
$$f_{mRNA_{RFP}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{RFP}\) |
$$f_{mRNA_{GFP}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{GFP}\) |
$$f_{mRNA_{RhlI}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{RhlI}\) |
$$f_{mRNA_{LasI}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{LasI}\) |
$$f_{mRNA_{MazF}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{MazF}\) |
$$f_{mRNA_{MazE}}$$ | The number of ACA sequences in \(mRNA_{MazE}\) |
$$\alpha$$ | Translation rate of Protein |
$$k_{Di_{MazF}}$$ | Formation rate of MazF dimer |
$$k_{-Di_{MazF}}$$ | Dissociation rate of MazF dimer |
$$k_{Di_{MazE}}$$ | Formation rate of MazE dimer |
$$k_{-Di_{MazE}}$$ | Dissociation rate of MazE dimer |
$$k_{Hexa}$$ | Formation rate of Maz hexamer |
$$k_{-Hexa}$$ | Dissociation rate of Maz hexamer |
$$p_{C4}$$ | Production rate of C4HSL by RhlI |
$$p_{C12}$$ | Production rate of 3OC12HSL by LuxI |
$$D$$ | Decomposition rate of 3OC12HSL by AmiE |
$$d$$ | Degradation rate of mRNA |
$$d_{RFP}$$ | Degradation rate of RFP |
$$d_{GFP}$$ | Degradation rate of GFP |
$$d_{RhlI}$$ | Degradation rate of RhlI |
$$d_{LasI}$$ | Degradation rate of LasI |
$$d_{MazF}$$ | Degradation rate of MazF |
$$d_{DiMazF}$$ | Degradation rate of MazF dimer |
$$d_{MazE}$$ | Degradation rate of MazE |
$$d_{DiMazE}$$ | Degradation rate of MazE dimer |
$$d_{Hexa}$$ | Degradation rate of Maz Hexamer |
$$d_{C4}$$ | Degradation rate of C4HSL |
$$d_{C12}$$ | Degradation rate of 3OC12HSL |
$$d_{AmiE}$$ | Degradation rate of AmiE |
2-2. Results
As a result, we obtained and confirmed the desirable behavior of the whole system by modifying and improving parts. As described below, our simulation showed appropriate transition of fluorescence for the story.
In the blue area of Fig, the fluorescence intensity starts to increase. Snow White coli’s fluorescence intensity exceeds that of the Queen coli’s. It represents Snow White got fairer more and more.
In the pink area of Fig, C12 is being synthesized thanks to the C4’s appearance. And the concentration of C12 increases. As a result, the toxin MazF augments inside of Snow White coli and the Queen coli, suppressing the increment of fluorescent proteins. It is as if the Mirror’s answer transformed the Queen into a Witch, so she can give Snow White a poisoned apple.
In the green area of Fig, C12 increases and the MazF inside Snow White coli induced by it increases even more. So the GFP exceeds the RFP. It looks as if Snow White bit the apple, sinking into unconsciousness promptly.
In the yellow area of Fig, the AmiE synthesized by the introduced Prince coli decomposes the C12 molecules so the amount of MazF inside Snow White diminishes and the amount of C4 increases. It looks as if Prince lifted Snow White and she opened her eyes.
3. Fitting
TEST
4. Sensitivity Analysis
We performed the sensitivity analysis descried in this section in order to examine which parameter dominates the story.
4-1. Requirements
We defined these requirements as the “successful Snow White story.”
1) At t = 150
concentration of RFP > concentration of GFP
2) At t = 700
concentration of RFP< concentration of GFP
3) At t = 1500
concentration of RFP > concentration of GFP
We the began to analyze the graph that satisfies these requirements that we could say that reproduces the story correctly. In the table bellow we show the range in which we modified each parameter. They were modified one step size at a time.
Parameter | Range | Step size |
$$D$$ | $$0.0001$$0.0001$$ | |
$$p_{C4}$$ | $$0.0001$$0.001$$ | |
$$p_{C12}$$ | $$0.0001$$0.001$$ | |
$$α$$ | $$0.01<α<0.2$$ | $$0.01$$ |
$$d_{AmiE}$$ | $$0.001$$0.001$$ | |
As a result, we obtained the following parameter ranges.
Parameter | Value |
$$D$$ | $$0.0056 |
$$p_{C4}$$ | $$0.0029 |
$$p_{C12}$$ | $$0.001 |
$$α$$ | $$0.01<α<0.16$$ |
$$d_{AmiE}$$ | $$0.001 |
4-2. the Prince coli should be put in in the middle
We run simulations in order to determine whether we would get a better behavior let we introduce the Prince coli at the beginning or halfway of the story.
As a result, if we introduce the Prince coli from the beginning, the number of Prince coli increases too much (Fig) so the AmiE the Prince coli produces augments and the decomposition of C12 also overly occurs. So C12 is almost inexistent in the medium (Fig).
On the other hand, if we introduce the Prince coli at t=700, the number of Prince coli does not increment much (Fig ), so C12 can exist until t=700 and then decreases thanks to the augment of AmiE (Fig ).
In conclusion, if we introduce the Prince coli at t=700, the circuit will behave accordingly.
4-3. Prhl should be changed
In order to confirm whether by using a combination of the current promoters we would be able to reproduce the story with our gene circuit, we performed some simulations based on the results of our assays.
The diagram above shows that the intensity of the two promoters should be in the red region of the figure.The combination of promoters we were originally going to use is shown in the graph by the green point. To move this point into the red region, we had to improve on Prhl so its expression level increases.
4-4. Production rate of C4HSL and 3OC12HSL by RhlI and LasI
The signaling molecule production rates by RhlI and LasI can be changed by modifying RhlI and LasI to make more or less signaling molecule in silico.
Each line corresponds to the transition of the concentration of RFP/GFP with a certain production rate of C12. Red and green lines correspond to RFP and GFP, respectively. Blighter one indicates higher production rate of C12.
if the production rate of C4 is between 0.029 and 0.778, our system can reproduce the story.
If this parameter is too small, The production of LasI by the Queen coli is insufficiently inhibited by MazF so C12 increases greatly. As a result, The concentration of GFP overcomes the concentration of RFP and the story does not develop correctly. And if this parameter is too big, The production of LasI by the Queen coli is overly inhibited by MazF so C12 does not increase. As a result, the concentration of RFP is always greater than the GFP concentration and the story does not develop either.
Each line corresponds to the transition of the concentration of RFP/GFP with a certain production rate of C4. Red and green lines correspond to RFP and GFP, respectively. Blighter one indicates higher production rate of C4.
If production rate of C12 is between 0.001 and 0.217, our system can reproduce the story.
4-5. Translation rate of protein
Translation rate affects the production of protein.
Each line corresponds to the transition of the concentration of RFP/GFP with a certain translation rate. Red and green lines correspond to RFP and GFP, respectively. Blighter one indicates higher translation rate.
If translation rate of protein is between 0.01 and 0.16, our system can reproduce the story.
4-6. Decomposition rate of C12 by AmiE
AmiE decomposes C12. The concentration of C12 after input of the Prince coli is changed by AmiE. If the decomposition rate of C12 is too small, C12 does not decrease enough so the MazF inside Snow White coli continues being expressed and the concentration of RFP decreases.
Each line corresponds to the transition of the concentration of RFP/GFP with a certain value of D. Red and green lines correspond to RFP and GFP, respectively. Blighter one indicates higher value of decomposition rate of C12.
If degradation rate of C12 is higher than 0.00056, our system can reproduce the story.
4-7. Degradation rate of AmiE
Each line corresponds to the transition of the concentration of RFP/GFP with a certain degradation rate of AmiE. Red and green lines correspond to RFP and GFP, respectively. Blighter one indicates higher degradation rate of AmiE.
Even if we modify the values of the parameters inside the defined range, the concentration of RFP overcomes the concentration of GFP. And even if the degradation rate of AmiE is small, the decomposition rate of C12 by AmiE is high enough so C12 decreases sufficiently.
4-8. Degradation rate of RFP and GFP
The degradation rate of RFP and GFP is key to the success the story of ‘Snow White’.
These parameters are closely related to the concentrations of GFP and RFP, so we conjectured that if they do not take appropriate values the story can not be correctly reproduced.
The story is reproduced only if the degradation rate of RFP and GFP are the same.
5. Software
5-1. Abstract
We developed a new software named ACADwarfs. This software helps to control the sensitivity of the protein to MazF by regulating the number of ACA sequences in the mRNA sequence. ACADwarfs can increase or decrease the number of ACA sequences on mRNA without changing the amino acid sequences that the mRNA specifies or frameshifts resulted from insertion of bases without considering.
Therewith we improve the practicality of the characteristic of the mazEF system. For example you can let protein A express constantly by eliminating ACA sequences of the sequence, while letting protein B suspend to express, at the desirable timing, by expression of MazF.
This software also evades using rare codons, so you don’t have to worry about them.
5-2. Key achievement
・Provided the tool regulating the number of ACA sequences
・Released under open-source license so everyone can use it
・Able to correspond to any base arrangements
・Rare codons are evaded
・Extend the application field of mazE system