Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Delft/Proof"

Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
                     <p>When making biological lenses, the shape of the lens is of crucial importance. <i>E. coli</i> is a rod-shaped organism,  
 
                     <p>When making biological lenses, the shape of the lens is of crucial importance. <i>E. coli</i> is a rod-shaped organism,  
                         so it’s not symmetrical along all axes. Shining light on the round parts of <i>E. coli</i> has a different effect
+
                         so it is not symmetrical along all axes. Shining light on the round parts of <i>E. coli</i> has a different effect
                         on the focusing of light than shining light on the long sides, see figure 1 <b>add this figure??</b>. More information on this can be found  
+
                         on the focusing of light than shining light on the long sides (Figure 1).
 +
                        <!-- figure modelling !-->
 +
                        More information on this can be found  
 
                         on the <b><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Model" target="_blank">modeling</a></b> and  
 
                         on the <b><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Model" target="_blank">modeling</a></b> and  
 
                         <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#silicatein" target="_blank"><b>project</b></a> pages.
 
                         <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#silicatein" target="_blank"><b>project</b></a> pages.
 
                     </p>
 
                     </p>
                     <p> For some applications, such as the solar cells, this variation in shape
+
                     <p> Biolenses with a spherical phenotype have an advantage over Biolenses with the rod-shaped <i>E. coli</i> phenotype,
                        does not matter that much; here it’s most important that light gets focused
+
                         as for the round lenses, the orientation of the lens does not matter. The spherical cells we produced had an increased
                        in any way <b>Modify this so it makes sense to do this</b>. However, when we want to use our microlenses in more advanced optical
+
                         diameter compared to wildtype <i>E. coli</i>. The diameter of 1 µm that we observed matches the size of a photovoltaic
                         systems, such as microscopes or cameras, we need to make sure that this variation
+
                         cell, and is hard to produce using conventional techniques. Conventional microlenses are usually bigger. Therefore,
                        between the different lenses is minimized. Manufacturers of optical systems do not
+
                         <strong>our method of producing microlenses has an advantage over the conventional production</strong>, since we
                         accept a high aberration between different lenses, so it’s crucial for us to be able
+
                         are able to produce far smaller lenses. Smaller lenses also means we can put more lenses on a surface, which increases the focusing effect.
                        to control the shape of our lenses. We have decided to engineer <i>E. coli</i> in such
+
                        a way that it becomes spherical. This way we are able to create spherical lenses. Apart
+
                         from the fact that it is crucial to be able to control cell shape, round cells offer the
+
                         advantage of being symmetrical along all axes, so the orientation of your lens does not
+
                         matter for the optical properties.
+
 
                     </p>
 
                     </p>
 
                     <p>To produce round shaped biolenses we need our <i>E. coli</i> to perform two special activities: produce the biolens itself and  
 
                     <p>To produce round shaped biolenses we need our <i>E. coli</i> to perform two special activities: produce the biolens itself and  
Line 50: Line 47:
 
                         originating from sponges, it is possible to coat the bacterium in a layer of polysilicate  
 
                         originating from sponges, it is possible to coat the bacterium in a layer of polysilicate  
 
                         <a href="#references">(Müller et al., 2008; Müller et al. 2003)</a>. Therefore, we are transforming <i>E. coli</i> with
 
                         <a href="#references">(Müller et al., 2008; Müller et al. 2003)</a>. Therefore, we are transforming <i>E. coli</i> with
                         silicatein-α. We test the use of  silicatein from two different organisms expressed in three different ways, of which the  
+
                         silicatein-α. We test silicatein from two different organisms expressed in three different ways, of which the  
 
                         most successful one was the construct consisting of silicatein from <i>Tethya aurantia</i> fused to the membrane protein OmpA  
 
                         most successful one was the construct consisting of silicatein from <i>Tethya aurantia</i> fused to the membrane protein OmpA  
 
                         (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890002" target="_blank">K1890002</a></b>)
 
                         (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890002" target="_blank">K1890002</a></b>)
                         as shown by Rhodamine123 staining and other imaging experiments (see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#silicatein" target="_blank"><b>project page</b></a>).
+
                         as shown by Rhodamine 123 staining and other imaging experiments (see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#silicatein" target="_blank"><b>project page</b></a>).
 
                     </p>
 
                     </p>
 
                     <p>In order to create spherical <i>E. coli</i>, we overexpress the <i>BolA</i> gene.  
 
                     <p>In order to create spherical <i>E. coli</i>, we overexpress the <i>BolA</i> gene.  
Line 61: Line 58:
 
                         round <a href="#references">(Aldea <i>et al.</i>, 1988)</a>. We express this gene both under a  
 
                         round <a href="#references">(Aldea <i>et al.</i>, 1988)</a>. We express this gene both under a  
 
                         constitutive promoter (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890031" target="_blank">K1890031</a></b>), as well as an inducible  
 
                         constitutive promoter (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890031" target="_blank">K1890031</a></b>), as well as an inducible  
                         promoter (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890030" target="_blank">K1890030</a></b>), the latest being our favorite
+
                         promoter (Part <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1890030" target="_blank">K1890030</a></b>), the latter being our favorite
 
                         due to the better result obtained (see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#Biolenses" target="_blank"><b>project page</b></a>).
 
                         due to the better result obtained (see <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft/Project#Biolenses" target="_blank"><b>project page</b></a>).
 
                         When we express both the <i>BolA</i> gene as well as silicatein, we are able to construct round cells, coated in glass.
 
                         When we express both the <i>BolA</i> gene as well as silicatein, we are able to construct round cells, coated in glass.

Revision as of 15:29, 18 October 2016

iGEM TU Delft


Functional proof of concept

Maybe some title??

When making biological lenses, the shape of the lens is of crucial importance. E. coli is a rod-shaped organism, so it is not symmetrical along all axes. Shining light on the round parts of E. coli has a different effect on the focusing of light than shining light on the long sides (Figure 1). More information on this can be found on the modeling and project pages.

Biolenses with a spherical phenotype have an advantage over Biolenses with the rod-shaped E. coli phenotype, as for the round lenses, the orientation of the lens does not matter. The spherical cells we produced had an increased diameter compared to wildtype E. coli. The diameter of 1 µm that we observed matches the size of a photovoltaic cell, and is hard to produce using conventional techniques. Conventional microlenses are usually bigger. Therefore, our method of producing microlenses has an advantage over the conventional production, since we are able to produce far smaller lenses. Smaller lenses also means we can put more lenses on a surface, which increases the focusing effect.

To produce round shaped biolenses we need our E. coli to perform two special activities: produce the biolens itself and change its shape from rod to round. As it is described in the project page in more detail, to be able to obtain biological lenses we need a coating of polysilicate, biological glass, around the cell. This glass will give optical properties for the cell. E. coli is intrinsically not able to coat itself in polysilicate. However, upon transformation of the silicatein-α gene, originating from sponges, it is possible to coat the bacterium in a layer of polysilicate (Müller et al., 2008; Müller et al. 2003). Therefore, we are transforming E. coli with silicatein-α. We test silicatein from two different organisms expressed in three different ways, of which the most successful one was the construct consisting of silicatein from Tethya aurantia fused to the membrane protein OmpA (Part K1890002) as shown by Rhodamine 123 staining and other imaging experiments (see project page).

In order to create spherical E. coli, we overexpress the BolA gene. BolA is a gene that controls the morphology of E. coli in the stress response (Santos et al. 1999). By overexpressing this gene, the rod-shaped E. coli cells will become round (Aldea et al., 1988). We express this gene both under a constitutive promoter (Part K1890031), as well as an inducible promoter (Part K1890030), the latter being our favorite due to the better result obtained (see project page). When we express both the BolA gene as well as silicatein, we are able to construct round cells, coated in glass.

  1. Aldea, M., Hernandez-Chico, C., De La Campa, A., Kushner, S., & Vicente, M. (1988). Identification, cloning, and expression of bolA, an ftsZ-dependent morphogene of Escherichia coli. Journal of bacteriology, 170(11), 5169-5176.
  2. Müller, W. E. G. (2003). Silicon biomineralization.
  3. Müller, W. E., Engel, S., Wang, X., Wolf, S. E., Tremel, W., Thakur, N. L., Schröder, H. C. (2008). Bioencapsulation of living bacteria (Escherichia coli) with poly (silicate) after transformation with silicatein-α gene. Biomaterials, 29(7), 771-779.
  4. Santos, J. M., Freire, P., Vicente, M., & Arraiano, C. M. (1999). The stationary‐phase morphogene bolA from Escherichia coli is induced by stress during early stages of growth. Molecular microbiology, 32(4), 789-798.