Line 838: | Line 838: | ||
<p><strong>Active heat load</strong> comes from the sample itself. It only applies to running electronic devices and not to cells, so it is zero in this situation. Radiation heat load, which is heat radiating off of surroundings and onto the sample, is usually insignificant, but in situations with large temperature differences like this freezer, it can have an effect. | <p><strong>Active heat load</strong> comes from the sample itself. It only applies to running electronic devices and not to cells, so it is zero in this situation. Radiation heat load, which is heat radiating off of surroundings and onto the sample, is usually insignificant, but in situations with large temperature differences like this freezer, it can have an effect. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
<p>The formula for <strong>radiation heat load</strong> is:</p> | <p>The formula for <strong>radiation heat load</strong> is:</p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8d/T--UMaryland--freezerE1.png"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8d/T--UMaryland--freezerE1.png"/> | ||
Line 848: | Line 849: | ||
<li>So radiation heat load = <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b4/T--UMaryland--freezerE4.png" class="inlineFigure"/></li> | <li>So radiation heat load = <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b4/T--UMaryland--freezerE4.png" class="inlineFigure"/></li> | ||
</ul></p> | </ul></p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
<p><strong>Conductive heat load</strong> is heat travelling through a solid medium (styrofoam in the freezer’s case) from the surroundings to the sample. | <p><strong>Conductive heat load</strong> is heat travelling through a solid medium (styrofoam in the freezer’s case) from the surroundings to the sample. | ||
<p>The formula for conductive heat load is <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/55/T--UMaryland--freezerE5.png" /></p> | <p>The formula for conductive heat load is <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/55/T--UMaryland--freezerE5.png" /></p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
<p><ul style="list-style:none;"> | <p><ul style="list-style:none;"> | ||
<li>k is the thermal conductivity, which is <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/02/T--UMaryland--freezerE6.png" /> for styrofoam.<sup>2</sup></li> | <li>k is the thermal conductivity, which is <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/02/T--UMaryland--freezerE6.png" /> for styrofoam.<sup>2</sup></li> | ||
Line 858: | Line 861: | ||
<li>So conductive heat load = <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/02/T--UMaryland--freezerE8.png" /></li> | <li>So conductive heat load = <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/02/T--UMaryland--freezerE8.png" /></li> | ||
</ul></p> | </ul></p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
<p><strong>Convective heat load</strong> is heat transferred from a fluid or gas flowing over the sample. Since the sample is surrounded on all sides by styrofoam, there is no air flow over the sample and no convective heat load (0 watts).</p> | <p><strong>Convective heat load</strong> is heat transferred from a fluid or gas flowing over the sample. Since the sample is surrounded on all sides by styrofoam, there is no air flow over the sample and no convective heat load (0 watts).</p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
Line 864: | Line 868: | ||
<p>Since the heat load on the sample is 1.8 W, the small cooler in contact with the sample must run under that heat load. According to the small cooler’s spec sheet, the cooler maintains most of its efficacy under this heat load. Although the chart predicts the small cooler will produce a temperature differential of over -50, this result is unlikely in reality. However, we can conclude that this cooler is appropriate for this heat load.</p> | <p>Since the heat load on the sample is 1.8 W, the small cooler in contact with the sample must run under that heat load. According to the small cooler’s spec sheet, the cooler maintains most of its efficacy under this heat load. Although the chart predicts the small cooler will produce a temperature differential of over -50, this result is unlikely in reality. However, we can conclude that this cooler is appropriate for this heat load.</p> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong>Second Stage</strong> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/97/T--UMaryland--freezerDiagram2.jpg" width="100%" /> | ||
+ | <p>The heat load on the bottom cooler is almost entirely active heat load from the top cooler, so we only need to calculate active heat load.</p> | ||
+ | |||
<p><ul style="list-style: none;"> | <p><ul style="list-style: none;"> | ||
<li><sup>1</sup>http://www.infrared-thermography.com/material-1.htm</li> | <li><sup>1</sup>http://www.infrared-thermography.com/material-1.htm</li> |
Revision as of 04:53, 19 October 2016
</div> </div>
Background |
Construction |
Modeling |
Demonstration |
---|
Background
We built the DIY ultra-low freezer specifically for iGEM teams. Ultra-low freezers, which are necessary to keep competent cells ready for transformation, are a vital part of any synthetic biology lab. However, they are complex and prohibitively expensive. The most affordable models are around $5000 USD and must be maintained by professionals. Many iGEM teams that struggle with funding cannot afford to purchase or maintain them. The DIY ultra-low freezer is our solution, a sub $300 USD, compact, modular device that any team can afford and maintain. Our freezer fits inside of refrigeration devices available in most school environments, including freezers and ice machines, to achieve temperatures below -70 C. The freezer is composed of solid parts held together with thermal grease and rubber bands, so it can be disassembled and repaired effortlessly. It can hold five PCR tubes or one 1.5 mL tube of competent cells, enough for a single team.
Construction
The DIY freezer requires very little assembly and can be easily maintained due to its modularity.
List of Parts
Component | Price | |
---|---|---|
Small Cooler | $65 + $3 RTV sealant* | |
Large Cooler | $63 (RTV sealed) | |
Water Block | $93 | |
Thermal Grease | $5 | |
3D printed shell | $3 | |
3D printed scaffolding | $0.25 | |
Power supply 1 | $25 | |
Power supply 2 | $20 | |
ZMLM water pump | $20 | |
AC cable x2 | $10 | |
Vinyl tubing | $3 | |
Styrofoam insulation | recycle | |
Rubber band | recycle | |
TOTAL | $312.25** |
*RTV sealent is necessary to protect the coolers from condensation damage. ** Project cost $290 at the time of assembly. prices have increased unexpectedly.
Assembly
The freezer has a brick-like vertical structure and is assembled by stacking parts in the proper order shown below. The final dimensions are 2” cubed.
The large cooler is mounted onto the water block with thermal grease. To mount, begin by cleaning the surfaces of the water block and the cooler. Next, apply a thin layer of thermal grease in a zig-zag pattern, covering as much surface as possible. Place the hot side of the cooler (side wires are on) on the block and twist it into the block to spread the grease and squeeze out any excess. Align the cooler with the block. Repeat this process when mounting the small cooler on top of the large cooler.
Wiring
CAUTION: do not work on the power supply or wires when they are plugged in! Wire the large power supply to the large cooler and the small supply to the small cooler. Hook the brown wire to L, blue to N, green/yellow to ground, black to -V, red to +V.
Sample
To install the sample, push it into the styrofoam block. If it it becomes difficult, use a pipette tip to help form a hole.
Pump and Tubing
Cut the tubing to appropriate length and use it to connect one barb on the cold block to the pump’s nozzle. Place the pump at the bottom of the reservoir. Only run the pump when it is fully submerged.
Modeling
First StageThe first calculation to be performed is the heat load on the sample being frozen, which must be removed by the small cooler in contact with that sample. We have found that the best resource for these calculations is on the Marlow Industries Website. The Marlow website also provides instructions on how to select the appropriate cooler for the calculated heat load. Four types of heat load can act on the sample being frozen: active, radiation, conductive, and convective heat load.
Active heat load comes from the sample itself. It only applies to running electronic devices and not to cells, so it is zero in this situation. Radiation heat load, which is heat radiating off of surroundings and onto the sample, is usually insignificant, but in situations with large temperature differences like this freezer, it can have an effect.
The formula for radiation heat load is:
- F is the shape factor, which we will assume is equal to the worst case, 1.
- e is emissivity, which is 0.94 for clear plastic, which the tubes are made of.1
- S it the Stefan-Boltzmann constant
- A is surface area of the sample, which, for a typical 1.5 ml tube (Diameter 0.010 m, length 0.045 m) is about
- In a freezer, the ambient temperature, Tamb = -20 C = 253 K, and we are assuming the cooled temperature Tc = -80 C = 193 K
- So radiation heat load =
Conductive heat load is heat travelling through a solid medium (styrofoam in the freezer’s case) from the surroundings to the sample.
The formula for conductive heat load is
- k is the thermal conductivity, which is for styrofoam.2
- A is the surface area, which we calculated to be
- DT is the temperature difference between the sample and the environment, which is 253 K - 193 K = 60 K
- L is the length of the heat path, or the length of solid medium between the sample and environment, which is 0.020 m for the freezer’s styrofoam block
- So conductive heat load =
Convective heat load is heat transferred from a fluid or gas flowing over the sample. Since the sample is surrounded on all sides by styrofoam, there is no air flow over the sample and no convective heat load (0 watts).
First Stage Heat Load = Active + Radiation + Conductive + Convective = 1.8 W
Since the heat load on the sample is 1.8 W, the small cooler in contact with the sample must run under that heat load. According to the small cooler’s spec sheet, the cooler maintains most of its efficacy under this heat load. Although the chart predicts the small cooler will produce a temperature differential of over -50, this result is unlikely in reality. However, we can conclude that this cooler is appropriate for this heat load.
Second StageThe heat load on the bottom cooler is almost entirely active heat load from the top cooler, so we only need to calculate active heat load.
- 1http://www.infrared-thermography.com/material-1.htm
- 2http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/thrcn.html
Demonstration
We ran the whole system in a stand in refrigerator overnight. Our coolant reservoir was a styrofoam container full of ice. The thing about styrofoam is that it slightly shrinks in cold rooms it lost its watertightness and bled all of the water out, leaving the pump dry and causing the system to overheat as the system overheated, the first failure occurred in the bottom module. the plastic case melted onto it and cut the module’s wires like a guillotine the second failure was in the top power supply. The plastic casing melted into the power supply and gummed it up. On the bright side, the bottom module’s failure saved the bottom power supply and the top power supplies failure saved the top module Everything else is intact. If it had not been in the cold room it would have been worse. The pump was dry and running but it did not melt thanks to the local temp, and the top module did not get too hot either
In trying to repair the freezer, it was discovered that the bottom module was fully functional when the wires were reconnected. The top module, whose wires had remained intact, looked entirely normal on the outside but no longer functioned. After drying for a day, the top power supply had regained full functionality. The plastic barbs on the cold block had partially melted off, but were easily glued back on. In the end, only one key part needed to be replaced: the top module at $63. The scaffolding also needed to be reprinted, at a cost of $3. Surprisingly, the styrofoam insulation remained entirely unaffected as the plastic melted around it. We assume the sample of competent cells is dead.