Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
<!-- word begin--> | <!-- word begin--> | ||
= <p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14.0000pt">Proof</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14.0000pt"></span></p> = | = <p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14.0000pt">Proof</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:14.0000pt"></span></p> = | ||
− | = <span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">1.Introduction</span> = | + | <div><p align="center" style="text-align:center"><br/> |
− | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> | + | </p> |
− | <p><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">2.Material, Condition andMethod</span></ | + | = <p><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">1.Introduction</span></b></p> = |
− | < | + | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> In our project, we transform theexpression vector of <i>Cry</i> and <i>Cyt</i> toxins. Based on the toxin groups,we construct six various toxins express devices as <i>Figure1</i>. To compare the toxicities, we also tested the toxicity of <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> strain <i>LLP229</i>. </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> [[File:T--FAFU-CHINA--proof2.png | 825px | thumb | center ]]</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"></span></p> |
+ | <p><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">2.Material, Condition andMethod<br/> | ||
+ | <span> </span></span></b><span style="text-indent:36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"">The larvae of <i>Ae. albopictus</i> are feeding in the Key Laboratory of Biopesticideand Chemical Biology. The generation of <i>Ae.albopictus </i>is 11. The <i>LLP229</i>strain of <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> isprovided by Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology.</span><span style="text-indent:36pt;font-family:""> The concentration of </span><i style="text-indent:36pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">LLP229</span></i><span style="text-indent:36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"">is recorded in eachtable.</span></p> | ||
<p style="text-indent:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">The CC530 and FA479 strains of <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii </i>and TAP mediumare bought from the Aquatic Species Research Institute in Wuhan, Hubei.</span><span style="font-family:":,serif"> The concentration of </span><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Chlamydomonasreinhardtii </span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">is recorded ineach table.</span></p> | <p style="text-indent:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">The CC530 and FA479 strains of <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii </i>and TAP mediumare bought from the Aquatic Species Research Institute in Wuhan, Hubei.</span><span style="font-family:":,serif"> The concentration of </span><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Chlamydomonasreinhardtii </span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">is recorded ineach table.</span></p> | ||
<p style="text-indent:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">We contrasted various toxins groupexpression vectors and transform them into <i>Chlamydomonasreinhardtii </i>as following groups: <i>Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt1, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt2</i>.</span></p> | <p style="text-indent:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">We contrasted various toxins groupexpression vectors and transform them into <i>Chlamydomonasreinhardtii </i>as following groups: <i>Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt1, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt2</i>.</span></p> | ||
Line 373: | Line 375: | ||
</td> </tr></tbody> | </td> </tr></tbody> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
− | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> | + | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"><br/> |
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Note1. The <span>OD</span></span><sub><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">750 </span></sub><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">of <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is </i></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">0.559</span></p> | ||
<p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 2. The Control 1 group is </span><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> (notransformation,<span> OD=</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">0.629</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">)</span></p> | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 2. The Control 1 group is </span><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> (notransformation,<span> OD=</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">0.629</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">)</span></p> | ||
<p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium </span></p> | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium </span></p> | ||
Line 461: | Line 474: | ||
<p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium<br/> | <p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"> 3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium<br/> | ||
</span></p> | </span></p> | ||
− | <p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Reference</span></p> | + | = <p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif">Reference</span></p> = |
<p><span style="font-family:"font-size:12pt;text-indent:-36pt">1.Zhang, L., Huang, E., Lin, J., Gelbič,I., Zhang, Q., Guan, Y., … Guan, X. (2010). A novel mosquitocidal strain LLP29isolated from the phylloplane of. Microbiological Research, 165(2), 133–141.doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.03.002</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"><span> </span></span></p> | <p><span style="font-family:"font-size:12pt;text-indent:-36pt">1.Zhang, L., Huang, E., Lin, J., Gelbič,I., Zhang, Q., Guan, Y., … Guan, X. (2010). A novel mosquitocidal strain LLP29isolated from the phylloplane of. Microbiological Research, 165(2), 133–141.doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.03.002</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:":,serif"><span> </span></span></p> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | <br/> | |
− | + | <br/> | |
+ | </div> | ||
<!-- word end --> | <!-- word end --> | ||
<!-- themejs --> | <!-- themejs --> |
Revision as of 00:09, 20 October 2016
Contents
Proof
1.Introduction
In our project, we transform theexpression vector of Cry and Cyt toxins. Based on the toxin groups,we construct six various toxins express devices as Figure1. To compare the toxicities, we also tested the toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis strain LLP229.
2.Material, Condition andMethod
The larvae of Ae. albopictus are feeding in the Key Laboratory of Biopesticideand Chemical Biology. The generation of Ae.albopictus is 11. The LLP229strain of Bacillus thuringiensis isprovided by Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology. The concentration of LLP229is recorded in eachtable.
The CC530 and FA479 strains of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and TAP mediumare bought from the Aquatic Species Research Institute in Wuhan, Hubei. The concentration of Chlamydomonasreinhardtii is recorded ineach table.
We contrasted various toxins groupexpression vectors and transform them into Chlamydomonasreinhardtii as following groups: Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt1, Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt2, Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt1,Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt2.
The toxicity analysis condition is in anenvironmentally controlled room (T=28±1 °C, RH=85%±5%, L: D=14:10).
Bioassay of variousconcentrations were assayed against 30 third-instar larvae in 20 ml of dechlorinatedwater. Each group was replicated 3 times. The level of mortality was recordedafter 48 hours. Then calculated the corrected mortality. The bioassay was thenrepeated such that a concentration range yielding 10–90% mortality was obtainedand the 50% lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated.
Table 1.1 Toxicity of LLP29 to A. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
2 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
3 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
Control | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Note. Thenconcentration of LLP29 is 2.16 x 109 (OD750 of 1.0 = 8 x 108 cells/ml,OD750 =2.7A.)
Table 1.2 Toxicity of LLP29 to Culex quinquefasciatus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
2 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
3 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
Control | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Note. Thenconcentration of LLP29 is 2.16 x 109 (OD750 of 1.0 = 8 x 108 cells/ml,OD750 =2.7A)
Table 2.1 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt1) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 93 | 93% |
2 | 100 | 89 | 89% |
3 | 100 | 91 | 91% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note.1. The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Table 2.2 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry4Aa+2A+Cyt2) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 89 | 89% |
2 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
3 | 100 | 88 | 88% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note1. The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Table 2.3 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt1) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
2 | 100 | 92 | 92% |
3 | 100 | 91 | 91% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note1.The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Table 2.4 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry10Aa+2A+Cyt2) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
2 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
3 | 100 | 89 | 89% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note1. The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Table 2.5 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt1) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
2 | 100 | 95 | 95% |
3 | 100 | 91 | 91% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note1.The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Table 2.5 Toxicity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii(Cry11Aa+2A+Cyt2) toA. albopictus
Repeating group | Number of insects | Number of mortality | Corrected mortality (%) |
1 | 100 | 91 | 91% |
2 | 100 | 90 | 90% |
3 | 100 | 89 | 89% |
Control 1 Control 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Note1. The OD750 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is 0.559
2. The Control 1 group is Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (notransformation, OD=0.629)
3. The Control 2 group is TAP medium
Reference
1.Zhang, L., Huang, E., Lin, J., Gelbič,I., Zhang, Q., Guan, Y., … Guan, X. (2010). A novel mosquitocidal strain LLP29isolated from the phylloplane of. Microbiological Research, 165(2), 133–141.doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.03.002