Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
An <i>in vivo</i> experiment designed by us supports the EMSA results. A construct containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) upstream and a red fluorescent protein (RFP) downstream of the DBD binding site has been used. Since we observed a lower RFP/GFP ratio in the presence of the DBD, the DBD appears to bind to its target site, thereby preventing the polymerase to express RFP. | An <i>in vivo</i> experiment designed by us supports the EMSA results. A construct containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) upstream and a red fluorescent protein (RFP) downstream of the DBD binding site has been used. Since we observed a lower RFP/GFP ratio in the presence of the DBD, the DBD appears to bind to its target site, thereby preventing the polymerase to express RFP. | ||
<br><center><figure class="figure"> | <br><center><figure class="figure"> | ||
− | <img class="figure-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/52/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_TECAN_binding.png" width= | + | <img class="figure-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/52/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_TECAN_binding.png" width=65%/> |
<figcaption class="figure-caption"><b>Figure 4: Tecan results.</b> In the Tecan plate reader the RFP intensity was measured. The <i>E. coli</i> cultures with (red) and without (black) producing the cI repressor were analyzed. Error bars are implemented.</figcaption> | <figcaption class="figure-caption"><b>Figure 4: Tecan results.</b> In the Tecan plate reader the RFP intensity was measured. The <i>E. coli</i> cultures with (red) and without (black) producing the cI repressor were analyzed. Error bars are implemented.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</center><br> | </center><br> | ||
− | Last but not least we established to show a higher expression rate when using both fusion proteins in contrast to a negative control with only one, indicating the functionality of the bacterial two-hybrid system in general. | + | Last but not least we established to show a <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Selection/KnockOutKnochIn">higher expression rate when using both fusion proteins</a> in contrast to a negative control with only one, indicating the functionality of the bacterial two-hybrid system in general. |
<center><figure class="figure"> | <center><figure class="figure"> | ||
<img class="figure-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_RFP_B2H.png" width=65%> | <img class="figure-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_RFP_B2H.png" width=65%> |
Revision as of 03:15, 20 October 2016
Results Selection
The purpose of our project was developing a system to generate Evobodies that are able to bind any given target protein. While a library and the mutation system grant high variability of Evobodies, we needed a method to screen for those that actually show affinity to the target protein. That is why we decided to utilize an in vivo selection system. The beauty of this approach is, that selective advantage for functional Evobodies ensures the lone survival of bacteria providing exactly those, eventually.
We were able to successfully clone the two constructs for the fusion proteins as well as several controls for our bacterial two-hybrid system. Furthermore, we checked if our fusion proteins were expressed as estimated. This was analyzed mainly using SDS PAGE and Western Blot. In addition, we were able to show that our fusion proteins actually interacted. This was achieved via a BLItz experiment:
To test the affinity of our DNA-binding domain (DBD) towards its supposed binding site we examined their interaction in vitro using EMSA. The results depict the expected band shift strongly suggesting interaction between DBD and its binding site.
An in vivo experiment designed by us supports the EMSA results. A construct containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) upstream and a red fluorescent protein (RFP) downstream of the DBD binding site has been used. Since we observed a lower RFP/GFP ratio in the presence of the DBD, the DBD appears to bind to its target site, thereby preventing the polymerase to express RFP.
Last but not least we established to show a higher expression rate when using both fusion proteins in contrast to a negative control with only one, indicating the functionality of the bacterial two-hybrid system in general.
We were able to successfully clone the two constructs for the fusion proteins as well as several controls for our bacterial two-hybrid system. Furthermore, we checked if our fusion proteins were expressed as estimated. This was analyzed mainly using SDS PAGE and Western Blot. In addition, we were able to show that our fusion proteins actually interacted. This was achieved via a BLItz experiment:
To test the affinity of our DNA-binding domain (DBD) towards its supposed binding site we examined their interaction in vitro using EMSA. The results depict the expected band shift strongly suggesting interaction between DBD and its binding site.
Last but not least we established to show a higher expression rate when using both fusion proteins in contrast to a negative control with only one, indicating the functionality of the bacterial two-hybrid system in general.