Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The use of the same pUC19-derived pMB1 origin of replication within pSB1C3 and pSB1K3 could cause problems, because<i> E. coli</i> is not able to control the amount of plasmid in the cell if both plasmids have the same ori. The next step was the exchang of the backbone of the part with SH2-cI and the reporter from pSB1K3 to <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB4C5">pSB4C5</a>. The pSB4C5 vector uses the pSC101 origin of replication. | The use of the same pUC19-derived pMB1 origin of replication within pSB1C3 and pSB1K3 could cause problems, because<i> E. coli</i> is not able to control the amount of plasmid in the cell if both plasmids have the same ori. The next step was the exchang of the backbone of the part with SH2-cI and the reporter from pSB1K3 to <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB4C5">pSB4C5</a>. The pSB4C5 vector uses the pSC101 origin of replication. | ||
For different antibiotic resistances the coding sequence of the other fusion protein HA4-RpoZ was cloned in the pSB1K3 vector. To test the efficiency of the new constructs, both were transformed in the <i>E. coli</i> strain KRX together. A comparison of a culture with cells carrying both plasmids and a culture with only the pSB4C5 plasmid containing the reporter and the SH2-cI fusion protein reveals visible differences in the RFP fluorescence intensity. The culture with both plasmids has a higher | For different antibiotic resistances the coding sequence of the other fusion protein HA4-RpoZ was cloned in the pSB1K3 vector. To test the efficiency of the new constructs, both were transformed in the <i>E. coli</i> strain KRX together. A comparison of a culture with cells carrying both plasmids and a culture with only the pSB4C5 plasmid containing the reporter and the SH2-cI fusion protein reveals visible differences in the RFP fluorescence intensity. The culture with both plasmids has a higher | ||
− | visual red color. To validate the results, the two cultures were measured in the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Experiments/Protocols#tecan">Tecan</a> plate reader | + | visual red color. To validate the results, the two cultures were measured in the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Experiments/Protocols#tecan">Tecan</a> plate reader (figure 1). |
<figure class="figure"> | <figure class="figure"> | ||
<img class="figure-img" align="left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_RFP_B2H.png" width=45%> | <img class="figure-img" align="left" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2016_10_18_SEL_RFP_B2H.png" width=45%> |
Latest revision as of 12:02, 18 November 2016
In vivo selection
Strong evidence was provided, that both created fusion proteins of our bacterial two-hybrid system are expressed in the cell. Moreover, the positive control HA4 and SH2 are interacting with each other and the chosen DNA
binding domain cI of the phage 434 is binding at the specific binding site OR1 upstream of the promoter. The parts BBa_K2082221 with the functional HA4-rpoZ fusion protein, BBa_K2082231 with the functional SH2-cI fusion protein and
the reporter of the bacterial two-hybrid system had to be combined in one E. coli cell. However, the created HA4 mutations and the Gal4-RpoZ (BBa_K2082226) as the negative control were tested together with BBa_K2082231. Even after a successful transformation with both plasmids no visible difference between the five approaches was observed.
Moreover, exchanging the binding site by the binding site of the lambda cI did not produce new results.
The use of the same pUC19-derived pMB1 origin of replication within pSB1C3 and pSB1K3 could cause problems, because E. coli is not able to control the amount of plasmid in the cell if both plasmids have the same ori. The next step was the exchang of the backbone of the part with SH2-cI and the reporter from pSB1K3 to pSB4C5. The pSB4C5 vector uses the pSC101 origin of replication. For different antibiotic resistances the coding sequence of the other fusion protein HA4-RpoZ was cloned in the pSB1K3 vector. To test the efficiency of the new constructs, both were transformed in the E. coli strain KRX together. A comparison of a culture with cells carrying both plasmids and a culture with only the pSB4C5 plasmid containing the reporter and the SH2-cI fusion protein reveals visible differences in the RFP fluorescence intensity. The culture with both plasmids has a higher visual red color. To validate the results, the two cultures were measured in the Tecan plate reader (figure 1). Like expected, the two measured samples differ from each other. A comparison of the RFP intensity demonstrates an about 48% higher RFP signal if the bacteria carrying both fusion proteins SH2-cI and HA4-RpoZ except only the SH2-cI. To calculate if the difference can be pointed out as significant, an unpaired two sample t-test was applied. With a calculated t-value of 4.62 and the corresponding p-value of 0.0099 the possibility, that the difference between these two fluorescence signals are caused by chance is lower than 1%. Due to the fact that the results are very significant the evidence is given, that in vivo selection with our designed bacterial two-hybrid system is possible.
Although it is shown that the bacterial two-hybrid system is working, the output signal is lower than expected. Two possibilities could increase the transcription activity of the bacterial two-hybrid selection system. The first opportunity is the reduction of the background activity of the promoter. The used promoter BBa_K2082210 is a little bit leaky. Therefore, without any interaction of the two fusion proteins the gene is a little bit expressed. In the measurement the reporter was brought in the pSB4C5 plasmid. For the plasmid itself a very high amount of DNA was measured after every plasmid isolation. Therefore, we expect it to be a high copy plasmid. Although the promoter is only a little bit leaky, the high amount of plasmid leads to a high number of the reporter gene transcripts. And if every reporter is a little bit leaky, the sole number of the reporter causes a high signal of RFP. This is seen in the figure X, considering that the RFP signal is extremly high, without any transcription activation through the two fusion proteins. The second possibility for the low activation rate of the selection system is the native rpoZ gene in the E. coli cell. RpoZ is a subunit of the RNA polymerase I core complex. Under normal conditions the RpoZ protein would be guided by the beta´-subunit to the core complex of the polymerase as the last unit. If E. coli produces a lot of native RpoZ it competes with the RpoZ coupled with the HA4 Monobody. Therefore, it is possible, that most of the most polymerases build their core with the native RpoZ instead the RpoZ-HA4 fusion protein. In this complex it is not able to be recruited by the second fusion protein and the transcription activation of the reporter stay off.
An interesting fact is, that the RNA polymerase do not necessarily needs the RpoZ protein of their functionality (Gosh et al., 2001; Mathew et al., 2005). Therefore, the next step for the bacterial two-hybrid system is a knock-out of the native rpoZ gene combined with a knock-in of the beta-lactamase containing reporter(BBa_K2082238) in the genome of our working strain JS200 of E. coli. With this attempt it is possible to decrease the background activity of the reporter by only one copy of the reporter left in the cell and to eliminate the expression of the native RpoZ and preventing the competiton of the native RpoZ with the RpoZ-HA4 fusion protein in one step.
The use of the same pUC19-derived pMB1 origin of replication within pSB1C3 and pSB1K3 could cause problems, because E. coli is not able to control the amount of plasmid in the cell if both plasmids have the same ori. The next step was the exchang of the backbone of the part with SH2-cI and the reporter from pSB1K3 to pSB4C5. The pSB4C5 vector uses the pSC101 origin of replication. For different antibiotic resistances the coding sequence of the other fusion protein HA4-RpoZ was cloned in the pSB1K3 vector. To test the efficiency of the new constructs, both were transformed in the E. coli strain KRX together. A comparison of a culture with cells carrying both plasmids and a culture with only the pSB4C5 plasmid containing the reporter and the SH2-cI fusion protein reveals visible differences in the RFP fluorescence intensity. The culture with both plasmids has a higher visual red color. To validate the results, the two cultures were measured in the Tecan plate reader (figure 1). Like expected, the two measured samples differ from each other. A comparison of the RFP intensity demonstrates an about 48% higher RFP signal if the bacteria carrying both fusion proteins SH2-cI and HA4-RpoZ except only the SH2-cI. To calculate if the difference can be pointed out as significant, an unpaired two sample t-test was applied. With a calculated t-value of 4.62 and the corresponding p-value of 0.0099 the possibility, that the difference between these two fluorescence signals are caused by chance is lower than 1%. Due to the fact that the results are very significant the evidence is given, that in vivo selection with our designed bacterial two-hybrid system is possible.
Although it is shown that the bacterial two-hybrid system is working, the output signal is lower than expected. Two possibilities could increase the transcription activity of the bacterial two-hybrid selection system. The first opportunity is the reduction of the background activity of the promoter. The used promoter BBa_K2082210 is a little bit leaky. Therefore, without any interaction of the two fusion proteins the gene is a little bit expressed. In the measurement the reporter was brought in the pSB4C5 plasmid. For the plasmid itself a very high amount of DNA was measured after every plasmid isolation. Therefore, we expect it to be a high copy plasmid. Although the promoter is only a little bit leaky, the high amount of plasmid leads to a high number of the reporter gene transcripts. And if every reporter is a little bit leaky, the sole number of the reporter causes a high signal of RFP. This is seen in the figure X, considering that the RFP signal is extremly high, without any transcription activation through the two fusion proteins. The second possibility for the low activation rate of the selection system is the native rpoZ gene in the E. coli cell. RpoZ is a subunit of the RNA polymerase I core complex. Under normal conditions the RpoZ protein would be guided by the beta´-subunit to the core complex of the polymerase as the last unit. If E. coli produces a lot of native RpoZ it competes with the RpoZ coupled with the HA4 Monobody. Therefore, it is possible, that most of the most polymerases build their core with the native RpoZ instead the RpoZ-HA4 fusion protein. In this complex it is not able to be recruited by the second fusion protein and the transcription activation of the reporter stay off.
An interesting fact is, that the RNA polymerase do not necessarily needs the RpoZ protein of their functionality (Gosh et al., 2001; Mathew et al., 2005). Therefore, the next step for the bacterial two-hybrid system is a knock-out of the native rpoZ gene combined with a knock-in of the beta-lactamase containing reporter(BBa_K2082238) in the genome of our working strain JS200 of E. coli. With this attempt it is possible to decrease the background activity of the reporter by only one copy of the reporter left in the cell and to eliminate the expression of the native RpoZ and preventing the competiton of the native RpoZ with the RpoZ-HA4 fusion protein in one step.