Functional proof of concept
Producing microlenses with bacteria
To produce biolenses we need our E. coli to perform two special activities: produce a glass layer and change its shape from rod to spherical. To be able to obtain biological lenses we need a coating of polysilicate, biological glass, around the cell. This glass will give optical properties for the cell. E. coli is intrinsically not able to coat itself in polysilicate. However, upon transformation of the silicatein-α gene, originating from sponges, it is possible to coat the bacterium in a layer of polysilicate (Müller et al., 2008; Müller et al., 2003). Therefore, we are transforming E. coli with silicatein-α. We test silicatein from two different organisms expressed in three different ways. The most successful one was the construct consisting of silicatein from Tethya aurantia fused to the membrane protein OmpA (Part K1890002) as shown by Rhodamine 123 staining of the polysilicate (Figure 1) and other imaging experiments.
When making biological lenses, the shape of the lens is of crucial importance. E. coli is a rod-shaped organism, so it is not symmetrical along all axes. Shining light on the round parts of E. coli has a different effect on the focusing of light than shining light on the long sides (Figure 2). More information on this can be found on the modeling and project pages.
Biolenses with a spherical phenotype have an advantage over biolenses with the rod-shaped E. coli phenotype, as for the round lenses, orientation does not matter. In order to create spherical E. coli, we overexpress the BolA gene. BolA is a gene that controls the morphology of E. coli in the stress response (Santos et al., 1999). By overexpressing this gene, the rod-shaped E. coli cells will become spherical (Aldea et al., 1988). We express this gene both under a constitutive promoter (Part K1890031), as well as an inducible promoter (Part K1890030), the latter being our favorite due to the better result obtained (Figure 3).
The spherical cells we produced had an increased volume compared to wildtype E. coli. The diameter of 1 µm that we observed matches the size of a photovoltaic cell (the smallest unit of a solar panel), and this size is hard to produce using conventional techniques. Conventional microlenses are usually bigger. Therefore, our method of producing microlenses has an advantage over the conventional production, since we are able to produce far smaller lenses. Using smaller lenses also means we are able to put more lenses on a surface, which increases the focusing effect. When we express both the BolA gene as well as silicatein gene, we are able to construct round cells, coated in glass (Figure 4).
References
- Aldea, M., Hernandez-Chico, C., De La Campa, A., Kushner, S., & Vicente, M. (1988). Identification, cloning, and expression of bolA, an ftsZ-dependent morphogene of Escherichia coli. Journal of bacteriology, 170(11), 5169-5176.
- Müller, W. E. G. (2003). Silicon biomineralization.
- Müller, W. E., Engel, S., Wang, X., Wolf, S. E., Tremel, W., Thakur, N. L., Schröder, H. C. (2008). Bioencapsulation of living bacteria (Escherichia coli) with poly (silicate) after transformation with silicatein-α gene. Biomaterials, 29(7), 771-779.
- Santos, J. M., Freire, P., Vicente, M., & Arraiano, C. M. (1999). The stationary‐phase morphogene bolA from Escherichia coli is induced by stress during early stages of growth. Molecular microbiology, 32(4), 789-798.