TEST PREVIOUS STEM-LOOPS
It is reported that there are several native stem-loops that have effects on its flanking genes, either at the 3’ end or the 5’ end[1]. Ergo, we use two native stem-loops from R. capsulatus and E.coli[2] and a previously experimented stem-loops with different free energy to preliminary verify that stem-loops in the intergenic region can regulate the relative expression of two reporter genes within polycistrons. We measured them on both transcriptional and translational level.
The result see as follows:
Figure 1 Relative expression on transcriptional and translational level for stem-loops of -25.6 kcal/mol (measured by Mfold) contrast to the control group with no stem-loop. The result is the ratio of upstream gfp to downstream mCherry gene. Fluorescence is normalized by OD600. . Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate
After functions and sequence confirmed, we tested their function and standardized them to submitting to iGEM part registry with detailed description.
Click here to see more.
Results suggested that stem-loops at 3’ end functioned well in regulation. Hence we tested another two native stem-loops.
Figure 2 Structures of three discovered stem-loops
Figure 3 Stem-loops with lower folding free energy lead to stronger protection of upstream gene, which results in higher ratio of GFP to mCherry both in transcriptional and translational level. Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate
MEASURE A SERIES OF DESIGNED STEM-LOOPS
In addition to the confirmation of previous discovered stem-loops, we also devoted to exploring new stem-loops designed by ourselves. It is difficult to estimate the relationship between structure and energy, thus we weighed several software and finally chose Mfold, a commonly acknowledged one. Employing same rules, we designed several stem-loops (Figure 4) with various free folding energy and tested them again (Figure 5). As shows, these parts also tune the ratio of the upstream and downstream genes.
Figure 4 Structure of three stem-loops designed by ourselves
Figure 5 Relative expression on RNA and protein level for designed stem-loop of -30.1, -34.4,38.8,44.9kcal/mol (measured by Mfold) contrast to the control group with no stem-loop. The vertical coordinates is the ratio of upstream gfp to downstream mCherry. Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate
CONSTRUCT A WONDERFUL TOOLKIT
Collected those validated previous stem-loops and our designed ones, we got a set of stem-loops forming a toolkit. Below are the basic information of stem-loops in our toolkit.
Figure 4 Structure of three stem-loops designed by ourselves
FURTHER EXPLORATION OF FREE ENERGY
We measured them both on transcriptional and translational level. We have submitted these parts to iGEM parts registry with detailed characterization. And with the demands of bigger library and more detailed data, we are working on more stem-loops to expand our toolkit library. Below are the relative expression on two levels of different stem-loops in our toolkit.
Figure 6 RNA varying with folding free energy of stem-loops
Figure 7 protein expression varying with folding free energy of stem-loop
There may be certain relationship between the relative expression and free energy, so we did more to explore the relationship, see details at model.
Cistrons Concerto
Thanks
1.Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2.NEW ENGLAND Biolabs
3.GenScript
Contact us:
E-mail: oucigem@163.com
Designed and built by @ Jasmine Chen and @ Zexin Jiao
We are OUC-iGEM