Difference between revisions of "Team:SDU-Denmark/Demonstrate"

Line 32: Line 32:
 
<h5>Production optimization of plastic producing cells</h5>
 
<h5>Production optimization of plastic producing cells</h5>
 
<ul class="list">
 
<ul class="list">
<li><i><a href="#purify">Separation of strains due to different promoter and RBS ahead of the phaCAB genes</a></i></li>
+
<li><i><a href="#seperation">Separation of strains due to different promoter and RBS ahead of the phaCAB genes</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="#purify">Additional RBS is responsible for the largest increase in PHB</a></i></li>
+
<li><i><a href="#additional">Additional RBS is responsible for the largest increase in PHB</a></i></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 333: Line 333:
 
<p><em>Figure x display the number of events on the y-axis and the corresponding intensities on the x-axis. Cells of the different strains are displayed in different colors. Each event represents a cell and the intensity represents the amount of PHB in the respective cell.]</em></p>
 
<p><em>Figure x display the number of events on the y-axis and the corresponding intensities on the x-axis. Cells of the different strains are displayed in different colors. Each event represents a cell and the intensity represents the amount of PHB in the respective cell.]</em></p>
  
 +
<div  id="seperation" style="clear:right;"></div><br>
 +
<h5>Seperation of strains due to plastic production </h5>
 
<p>The figure shows a clear separation of the different strains. This we would expect for strains with different promoter and ribosomal binding sites ahead of the phaCAB genes. We included the BioBrick created by Tokyo Tech in 2009 <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934001"target="_blank">(K934001)</a> and one by Imperial College <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051"target="_blank">(K1149051)</a> in 2012 as references for our new constructs. The strain containing the reference constructs are displayed in green in figure X. However, as seen on the figure X, the events with the largest intensities, originates from the strain containing our construct <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2018036"target="_blank">(K2018036)</a>. This indicates that our construct generates more plastic, than any other hybrid promoter phaCAB tested in the figure.</p>
 
<p>The figure shows a clear separation of the different strains. This we would expect for strains with different promoter and ribosomal binding sites ahead of the phaCAB genes. We included the BioBrick created by Tokyo Tech in 2009 <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934001"target="_blank">(K934001)</a> and one by Imperial College <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1149051"target="_blank">(K1149051)</a> in 2012 as references for our new constructs. The strain containing the reference constructs are displayed in green in figure X. However, as seen on the figure X, the events with the largest intensities, originates from the strain containing our construct <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2018036"target="_blank">(K2018036)</a>. This indicates that our construct generates more plastic, than any other hybrid promoter phaCAB tested in the figure.</p>
  
Line 341: Line 343:
 
<p>Unlike our initial expectations, the results of our flow cytometry analysis strongly suggest that <b> the strongest additional promoter does not produce the largest amount of plastic.</b> However, without further qualitative data, we can only speculate as to why, this is the case. </p>
 
<p>Unlike our initial expectations, the results of our flow cytometry analysis strongly suggest that <b> the strongest additional promoter does not produce the largest amount of plastic.</b> However, without further qualitative data, we can only speculate as to why, this is the case. </p>
  
<p>Equally surprising is the fact that the <b>additional ribosomal binding site is responsible for the largest increase in PHB</b>. The additional RBS for the PhaCAB gene is not followed by a start-codon and as a result, ribosomal attachment to the specific RBS will not be able to initiate transcription. The strong and weak RBS generate less plastic, relative to the medium strong ribosome binding sites. We suggest that this tendency is caused by changes to the local concentration of ribosomes, due to the presence of an additional ribosomal binding site, upstream from the transcriptional RBS.</p>
+
<div  id="additional" style="clear:right;"></div><br>
 +
<h5> Additional RBS - largest increase in PHB production </h5>
 +
<p>Equally surprising is the fact that the additional ribosomal binding site is responsible for the largest increase in PHB. The additional RBS for the PhaCAB gene is not followed by a start-codon and as a result, ribosomal attachment to the specific RBS will not be able to initiate transcription. The strong and weak RBS generate less plastic, relative to the medium strong ribosome binding sites. We suggest that this tendency is caused by changes to the local concentration of ribosomes, due to the presence of an additional ribosomal binding site, upstream from the transcriptional RBS.</p>
 
<p>The figure below illustrates our thesis for the observations stated above. It is, however, important to keep in mind that we do not have qualitative data to back the thesis.</p>
 
<p>The figure below illustrates our thesis for the observations stated above. It is, however, important to keep in mind that we do not have qualitative data to back the thesis.</p>
  

Revision as of 11:55, 16 October 2016

Demonstration & Results



Bacteriocin purification
MIC test

Figure 1 shows results of a cPCR originating from respective colonies from transformation of K2018011/pTXB1/E.coli Top10 (ThuricinS), K2018012/pTXB1/E.coli Top10 (LacticinQ) and K2018014/pTXB1/E.coli Top10 (Laterusporulin-ThuricinS). From right; Well 1-3 + 5-7 + 13-14= K2018011, Well 4+8 = K2018014, Well 9-12 = K2018012. The expected length of ThuricinS is 304 bp. GeneRulerTM 100 bp DNA ladder were used. ThermoFisher scientific.

Successful cloning of the bacteriocins into the IMPACT vector pTXB1 were a key step in purifying the bacteriocins. Cloning into the IMPACT vector pTXB1 were shown by gel electrophoresis (Figure 1). A successful transformation was verified by a cPCR with specially designed primers according to the theoretical expected length (304 bp) of ThuricinS with IMPACT overhangs. The results show bands of similar lengths, thus showing a successful ligation of ThuricinS into pTXB1.


Determination of bacteriocin concentration
BACTERIOCINS OD  (595 nm) µg/mL
IMPACT ELUATE (Laterosporulin-Thuricin S) 0.078 52.55
IMPACT ELUATE (Lacticin Q) 0.069 44.36
IMPACT ELUATE (Laterosporulin) 0.094 67.09
IMPACT ELUATE (Thuricin S) 0.057 33.45
IMPACT ELUATE (LacticinQ-LacticinZ) 0.0536 30.36

Table X shows the respective concentrations of the purified bacteriocins. The concentrations are calculated according to the equation y = 0.0011x + 0.0202 derived from linear regression of the Bradford Standard Protein Assay. The protein concentration (x) is calculated as x = (y - 0.0202)/0.0011. The measured absorbance and the respective protein concentrations are shown in the table in µg/m L.

We purified the bacteriocins using the IMPACT Method. To assay the concentration of the purified bacteriocins, we used a Bradford standard protein assay of known concentrations of BSA (Bovine serum albumine) to compare measured absorbance of the bacteriocin to the relative absorbance of known standard protein concentrations. The following results were obtained due to the measured OD values.


Bacteriocin effect towards S. aureus MRSA and P. aeruginosa
Stk results bacto

Figure X: The graphs shows the results of MIC tests performed on cell lysates containing respective bacteriocins. The graphs are plotted as OD/hours where SN = Supernatant. The color code indicates the concentrations used [µg/mL]. SDU11 = ThuricinS K2018011 tested on E. Cloacae, SDU14 = Laterusporulin-ThuricinS K2018014 tested on P. aeruginosa

From the collaboration with the iGEM Stockholm team 2016 we got an indication of the effect of our bacteriocins. The iGEM Stockholm team performed MIC tests using cell lysates that contained our bacteriocins towards the strains; S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. cloacae. Part of the results from iGEM Stockholm team are shown in figure X.

The red/brown line indicates gentamycin as a positive control shown to inhibit the growth of Enterobacter cloacae. E. cloacae is considered to be an important cause of nosocomial infections Keller, R., Pedroso, M. Z., Ritchmann, R., & Silva, R. M. (1998). Occurrence of Virulence-Associated Properties in Enterobacter cloacae. Infection and Immunity, 66(2), 645–649. . The cell lysate containing ThuricinS (SDU11-SN) at 30 µg/mL elicit a similar and better effect towards E. cloacae compared to the traditional antibiotic gentamycin. The lysate containing ThuricinS is still effective after 40 hours of incubation. SDU14-SN represents a MIC test performed towards P. aeruginosa with cell lysate containing our hybrid bacteriocin Laterusporulin-ThuricinS. The cell lysate shows to have similar effect to the gentamycin towards P. aeruginosa. The above thus suggest ThuricinS and the hybrid Laterusporulin-ThuricinS to be potent inhibitors of the growth of E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa, respectively.

We purified our bacteriocins in order to specify the effect of our bacteriocins as single acting proteins. To assay the effect of our purified bacteriocins we performed a MIC test following SOP0027_v01. The bacteriocins were dissolved by a two-fold dilution in water from wells A-G having the largest concentration possible at column A. The maximal concentration used is the half of the calculated concentration of the bacteriocin. We used different MRSA strains to test the effect of the bacteriocins in order to state the possibility for the bacteriocins as substitute for traditional antibiotic of which the bacteria have evolved resistance towards. Following strains where tested:

MIC test

The MIC plates were performed with a two-fold dilution of the respective concentrations shown in Table x. The concentrations indicate final concentrations i.e. the concentration of the bacteriocin in the well after adding bacterial culture. An example of the bacteriocin K2018010/Laterosporulin concentration value plated in the MIC wells is shown in Figure x. To validate growth or inhibition we use background absorbance from dH2O+Mueller Hinton (MH) Media plus 10 % deviation as a reference value for estimation of growth. In Figure x a MIC plate for the bacteriocin Laterosporulin is shown. The picture states a visual inhibition of growth of the respective strains.

The below shows a MIC test

Figure x shows visual MIC test results of K2018011/ Thuricin S. Well A(1-10) contain 33.5 µg/mL as final maximal concentration. A two-fold dilution is performed in well B-G(1-10). Well H(1-10) does not contain bacteriocin, but contain bacterial culture. Well A-H(11-12) is BLANK.

Table X and Y show the respective MIC values according to the tested strains and the bacteriocins they were exposed to. N.I = No inhibition. Thus no inhibition was shown at the measured maximum concentrations.

Part nr. Bacteriocin/MIC [µg/mL] hVISA USA300 CC398 P.Aeruginosa
K2018011 Thuricin S 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7
K2018012 Lacticin Q 22.2 22.2 22.2 N.I < 22.2
K2018010 Laterosporulin 33.6 16.8 16.8 33.6
K2018015 LacticinQ-LacticinZ 7.6 7.6 7.6 15.2
K2018014 Laterosporulin-Thuricin S

13.1

13.1 6.6 N.I <13.1


Traditional Antibiotic/MIC

[µg/mL]

hVISA

USA300

CC398

P.Aeruginosa

Ampicilin

< 16.0

< 16.0

1000.0

N.I<1000.0

Chloramphenicol

78.0

N.I.<1000

N.I.<1000

< 39.0


Effect of bacteriocins

MIC values are visualized in the bar-chard in Figure X. The bacteriocin eliciting the strongest effect is indicated by the lowest bar – thus the lowest MIC value. Compared to MIC values of traditional antibiotics i.e. ampicillin and chloramphenicol the bacteriocins show similar effect. HOWEVER, the bacteriocins also show better effect due to inhibition of growth of strains, which the traditional antibiotics does not inhibit

In Figure x the lowest bar indicates the bacteriocin eliciting the strongest effect. ThuricinS affect all of the strains at a concentration of 16.6 µg/mL. LacticinQ shows to affect only the S. aureus strains at a MIC value of 22.2 µg/mL. Laterosporulin shows inhibition of growth towards all of the strains with the lowest MIC being towards the S. aureus strains, USA300 and MSSA CC398, with a MIC at 16.8 µg/mL. Even though the laterosporulin as a single bacteriocin affect P. aeruginosa, the Laterosporulin-ThuricinS hybrid does not elicit effect towards P. aeruginosa. However, it is seen that the MIC values towards hVISA, USA300 and CC398 (13.1 µg/mL, 13.1 µg/mL, 6.6 µg/mL respectively) are lower than the MIC value found in their single bacteriocin form (Thuricin S MIC 16.7 µg/mL and Laterosporulin MIC 16.8 µg/mL). This indicates a synergistically effect of hybrid bacteriocins compared to their single effect.

LacticinQ shows no inhibition towards P. aeruginosa. However, the absence of inhibition could also be due to a higher MIC value i.e. need of a higher concentration to inhibit growth than used in the MIC test. The hybrid LacticinQ-LacticinZ is seen to inhibit the growth of all the tested strains with a MIC equal to 7.6 µg/mL against the S. aureus strains and a MIC corresponding to 15.2 µg/mL towards P. aeruginosa. In addition, the MIC is decreased compared to the MIC estimated for LacticinQ alone (22.2 µg/mL). This could be due to the presence of LacticinZ. However, LacticinZ is not tested as a single bacteriocin and a direct comparison cannot state a decreased MIC for LacticinZ but only a decreased MIC for LacticinQ. Two bacteriocins working in concert (a hybrid) seem to contribute to a decrease in MIC and thus a stronger effect indicating synergy. It should thus be noted that the hybrid Laterosporulin-ThuricinS “looses” its effect towards P. aeruginosa, compared to their effect as single proteins.

Replicating MIC

DROPDOWN START

The MIC plates were incubated for 28 hours with equal OD values for each bacteria strain, thus equal amount of bacteria were added. For replicating the MIC experiment, the respective generation times of the bacterial strains used should be considered. The generation times could diverge between the bacterial strains thus representing different conditions, which is reflected in the OD measured. Therefore, the OD value between the strains cannot be compared, but the MIC values can. Furthermore, instead of using duplicates, multiple replications could have been made for specification of the OD value. Instead of calculating a mean value, a median could be calculated and we could thereby compare more OD values. By use of duplicates, pipette errors cannot be neglected. A new MIC test could therefore be performed with multiplicates.

DROPDOWN SLUT

Silk assembly


Insertion of MaSp gene fra into pSB1C3

In order to achieve a renewable source of the genes a key step was to ligate each gene fragment into their separate pSB1C3 vectors. Recall that the MaSp genes contain 3 gene fragments, which together make up a monomer and thus a functional MaSp protein. The ligated gene fragment/pSB1C3 was transformed into E. coli. Successful ligations were verified by colony PCR. The result from cPCR appeared to be 400 bp, which corresponds to one MaSp gene fragment with cPCR overhangs.

Figure X shows the cPCR products of MaSp gene fragments with overhangs. GeneRulerTM 100 bp DNA ladder were used.

The ICA technique allows us to ligate different pieces of DNA together stepwise due to matching overhangs. Eco31I recognizes four nucleotides, but cuts four randomly base pairs at the location + 1bp upstream from the recognition site. By making specific primers that add restriction sites we were thus able to create compatible overhangs between silk fibers. This approach was inspired from the iGEM UCLA team 2015.


Ligation test

We tested the ability of the genes to ligate by performing a ligation test. The digested gene is 106 bp. A bond at 212 bp verified that the gene fragments can be ligated together (Figure 5).

Indsæt figur 5

Figur tekst [Figure 5: Ligation test. Bands at 106 bp are the unligated silk gene. Bands at 212 bp represent the ligated product, and thereby verifies a successful ligation test.]


Preparing silk by the ICA method

It was possible to proof the concept of preparing silk from the iterative capped assembly method. One monomer of MaSp1 and MaSp2 was made by the ICA method (Figure X). Recall that one monomer of a MaSp gene consists of the gene fragments AB, BC and CA, and it is expected to have a length of 406 bp.

Figur indsættes - T--SDU-Denmark--ICAmonomer_MaSp1_and_MaSp2.png

Figur tekst [Figure x: ICA monomer of MaSp1 and MaSp2]

We tried to make constructs containing 4 MaSp gene monomers. However, we struggled succeeding in making a longer construct. The closest result we got was to make a gene containing 700 bp. To this point the results indicate that it is not possible to use the ICA method for longer constructs. There is however a great potential in the method, but it should be considered whether the method is applicable for longer constructs.


The dream of creating a silk-bacteriocin hybrid

We wanted to create the hybrid silk of a bacteriocin fused with a monomer of MaSp1, MaSp2 or even a four monomer with different proportions of the genes on DNA level. This was tested by using recombinant DNA technology. Two methods were tested: ICA, and restrictions cloning.

We managed to prepare a bacteriocin with specific overhangs matching the overhangs present on the MaSp genes in order to make them compatible. Lane no. 5 shows the bacteriocin ThuricinS with DA-overhangs. The band is expected to be 217 bp. ThermoFisher scientific GeneRuler 50 kb ladder was used. Figure x indicates that we succeeded getting silk-overhangs on ThuricinS.

Insæt figur m. bacteriocin overhang - T--SDU-Denmark-Bacteriocinoverhang_silk.png

Despite various attempts we never succeeded in cutting and ligating ThuricinS together with a silk monomer. It all fit well in theory, but when it came to reality, it was difficult to create in practice. The bacteriocin with specific silk overhangs are therefore left to further research.

What went wrong - what to do?

DROPDOWN START

ICA troubleshooting

Due to ICA's multiple ligation steps, individual ligation test were made in order to establish the viability of the constructs. Individual ligation tests are time consuming, but a necessity since a singular failed ligation can create negative results. As the ICA method is heavily reliant on everything to work as planned, alternative methods were tried. Furthermore, it must be noted that the small overhangs are seldom fit to ligate at room temperature. Likewise redesigning the gene towards a larger overhang might create easier ligations. During ligation, constant turbation of the fluids must be applied as the beads will subside in the bottom of the tube without, creating unfavorable conditions for ligations.

Alternative method

As a result of the missing success with the ICA method, alternative methods were used. We tried ligating constructs, which did not have overlapping overhangs eg. Initiator-AB-BC, CA-AB and BC-CA-Terminator. This were obtained by ligating in series at 16 degrees celsius overnight. The lower temperature would increase the possibility of ligation, however also decrease the activity of T7 ligase. Thus we added a small amount of 40 mM ATP to the sample at each ligation step hoping to create a silk construct.

LYKKEDES DETTE ? KONKLUSION MANGLER

Missing amplification of ThuricinS with silk overhangs

We noticed that using the standard primers from iGEM, VF2 and VR, our pPCR on plasmids containing the bacteriocin with silk-overhangs would after digestion lead to 2 bands that only differ by 1 bp from each other. We decided to amplify our bacteriocin with silk-overhangs. However, after changing primers we experienced that the pPCR gave unexplainable results including a lot of smear. Various pPCR programs were tested but we never ended up with a product that could be purified and used for ICA. We also tried to digest the pSB1C3 plasmid and the ThuricinS/silk-overhang pPCR product to perform a ligation into the pSB1C3 directly. This result was verified by gel electrophorese. However, it was not possible to digest the plasmid containing the ThuricinS with silk overhangs and a purification could not be performed. Ligation between the ThuricinS and a silk monomer was therefore not achieved. For future testing it would be interesting to cut with restrictions enzymes for longer periods, or maybe design new primers for the pPCR necessary for ICA method.

DROPDOWN SLUT

Production of PHB

The following section contains our results for optimizing and characterizing the production of PHB in E. coli.

PHB producing cells

In order to determine the effectiveness of our library of PHB producing cells, we used flow cytometry to get a picture of how effective the different strains were at producing plastic. By staining the cell cultures with nile red, we have created a relative quantitative measure for how much plastic is present inside each cell. The following results were obtained with 4 biologic replicates of each strain. The strains were incubated for 28 hours before the measurements were made.

[Table X shows the content of the biobrick constructs tested.]

Figure x display the number of events on the y-axis and the corresponding intensities on the x-axis. Cells of the different strains are displayed in different colors. Each event represents a cell and the intensity represents the amount of PHB in the respective cell.]


Seperation of strains due to plastic production

The figure shows a clear separation of the different strains. This we would expect for strains with different promoter and ribosomal binding sites ahead of the phaCAB genes. We included the BioBrick created by Tokyo Tech in 2009 (K934001) and one by Imperial College (K1149051) in 2012 as references for our new constructs. The strain containing the reference constructs are displayed in green in figure X. However, as seen on the figure X, the events with the largest intensities, originates from the strain containing our construct (K2018036). This indicates that our construct generates more plastic, than any other hybrid promoter phaCAB tested in the figure.

Figure x+1: display the different strains on the x-axis. The promoter and RBS are marked with corresponding affinity: “s” = strong, “W” = weak and “MS”=medium. The y-axis displays the average intensity on the flow cytometer detected by red fluorescence. The intensity of the red fluorescence is calculated due to a mean value of the intensities in figure x.

Unlike our initial expectations, the results of our flow cytometry analysis strongly suggest that the strongest additional promoter does not produce the largest amount of plastic. However, without further qualitative data, we can only speculate as to why, this is the case.


Additional RBS - largest increase in PHB production

Equally surprising is the fact that the additional ribosomal binding site is responsible for the largest increase in PHB. The additional RBS for the PhaCAB gene is not followed by a start-codon and as a result, ribosomal attachment to the specific RBS will not be able to initiate transcription. The strong and weak RBS generate less plastic, relative to the medium strong ribosome binding sites. We suggest that this tendency is caused by changes to the local concentration of ribosomes, due to the presence of an additional ribosomal binding site, upstream from the transcriptional RBS.

The figure below illustrates our thesis for the observations stated above. It is, however, important to keep in mind that we do not have qualitative data to back the thesis.

!! OBS figur mangler - hvilken skal indsættes?

Figure x+2: illustration of Figur med 3 RNA strenge, én med stærkt RBS, én med medium RBS og én med svagt RBS.

A strong RBS will bind the ribosome with high affinity. Since there is no start codon, the ribosome cannot initiate translation and due to the high affinity it will not detach readily. For a medium RBS, the affinity will be high enough for ribosomes to be attached to the RNA frequently, but due to the lower affinity, they will also detach more frequently. The event results in an increase in the local concentration of ribosomes. For the weak RBS the affinity will be too low for the local concentration of ribosomes to be effected.

Examining methods of PHB extraction

The method of PHB extraction is an important part of the production that should be taken into account, as it has a large impact on the purity and yield of PHB. Furthermore, the different chemicals used to extract PHB have various levels of toxicity and price, which is enormously relevant when considering industrialising the PHB production.

We have chosen four methods of extraction; hypochlorite digestion, hypochlorite digestion with Triton x-100 pre-treatment, chloroform solvent extraction and ethyl acetate solvent extraction.


HNMR as qualitative measure of purity for extration methods

In order to determine whether the different methods of PHB extraction we have used were effective, we analyzed the purified material with HNMR.
We determined the peaks caused by PHB by analyzing a sample of pure PHB as a reference. The sample of pure PHB can be held against the spectra from extracted PHB.

Figur indsættes - T--SDU-Denmark--PHB_ren_HNMR.png

Figure: Each peak is caused by hydrogen atoms. The area under each curve is proportional to the number of chemical equivalent hydrogen atoms causing the peak.

Since this spectrum is based on pure PHB, all the peaks present are not considered contaminations in the other spectra. For a more detailed analysis of the spectrum click here.

Figur indsættes - T--SDU-Denmark--PHB_extractions_HNMR.png

Figure X shows the illustration of the spectra for the methods of PHB extraction of which we have tested. Top left is for chloroform extraction, top right is for ethyl acetate extraction, bottom left is for hypochlorite extraction and bottom right is for hypochlorite extraction with triton x-100 pre-treatment.

Extraction with chloroform

This spectrum has very clearly defined PHB tops and no indications of impurities. The intensity/amplitude of the tops is so large that the peaks that are not from PHB are hardly visible. The spectrum indicates that the specific method of extraction, provides PHB with a high level of purity.

Extraction with ethyl acetate

This spectrum has well defined PHB peaks, but an unknown compound in the sample cause a peak at approximately 2.17 ppm. This indicates that the PHB purity is lowered with this extraction method, as compared with chloroform extraction.

Extraction with hypochlorite

The PHB peaks are clear, but once an impurity is registered in the spectrum, there is a broad peak at 2.3 ppm. The area under the two peaks near the impurity are almost doubled compared to the peak at 5.2 ppm. This inequality, however, is not significant as it is the impurity in the sample, that adds to the area of the peaks.

Extraction with hypochlorite and Triton x-100

The PHB peaks are present but the peak for water is absent. The event is not surprising as the PHB sample was dried out. (Der skal billeder ind af prøverne et sted, evt. Når musen holdes over titlen) There is no indication of impurities, although these could have evaporated along with the water. This specific method is similar to the hypochlorite extraction method. The Triton x-100 pre-treatment is performed to increase the digestion of cellular content, which could explain the absence of impurity. For the hypochlorite PHB extraction with Triton x-100 and the ethyl acetate purification, the entire content of the purification, was not soluble in chloroform. This indicates that large impurities were present in the sample and were not visible in the HNMR spectra.

Determination of intracellular PHB concentration

With gas chomatography the amount of PHB inside the cells can be determined. In order to do this, PHB standards were created of 2 mg for comparison with the amount of PHB in the samples. Cell samples of 20 mg were analysed and quadruplets of both standards and samples were made.

Figure x+1: The mirrored spectrum from a gas chromatography analysis of 20 mg cells containing K2018096 (blue) and a 2 mg pure PHB standard (red). PHB causes a top at 1.15 min. and a top at 2.135 min. The top at 2.135 min is an internal methyl benzoate standard.

The area under the curve illustrates the amount of the substance analyzed at the respective time. The amount of PHB in the figure is significantly lower in the sample than observed for the 2 mg PHB sample. This indicate that there is less than 2 mg PHB in the cell sample. When the data was normalized according to the methyl benzoate standard, it indicated that there is 0.7 mg PHB in 20 mg cell sample. This indicates that 3.5% of the cell mass is PHB. Compared to the amount of PHB we purify from each gram of biomass (to be continued)