Difference between revisions of "Team:Toulouse France/Design"

Line 21: Line 21:
 
<!-- ################################################################################################ -->
 
<!-- ################################################################################################ -->
  
<div class="column full_size">
 
 
 
 
 
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://2016.igem.org/Template:Toulouse_France/ANIMATE" />
 
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://2016.igem.org/Template:Toulouse_France/FANCYBOXCSS" />
 
 
<div id="fullpage">
 
 
<section class="section sui-l-fullpage cover" style="text-align: middle;background-color: #fff;">
 
<div class="svg-wrapper" style="display:inline-block; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; height: 500px;">
 
<svg id="svg-menu" style="width: 1043px; height: 500px;">
 
<g id="Page-1" stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd" sketch:type="MSPage">
 
<g id="qwe" sketch:type="MSLayerGroup">
 
 
<g id="Group">
 
 
<g id="p5" transform="translate(0.000000, 150.000000)">
 
<path d="M99,166.5 L238,0.5" id="Line" stroke="#CECECE" fill="#000000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup"></path>
 
<g id="Group" transform="translate(0.000000, 107.000000)">
 
<circle id="project" fill="#260000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup" cx="99" cy="99" r="99"></circle>
 
<a xlink:href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Toulouse_France/Design#Predation">
 
<text id="PROJECT" fill="#ffffff" sketch:type="MSTextLayer" font-family="Helvetica" font-size="23.5625" font-weight="normal">
 
<tspan x="47.3333333" y="109.166667" fill="#FFFFFF">Predation</tspan>
 
</text>
 
</a>
 
</g>
 
<animateMotion path="M28,-24.307911999999988 C28,-19.107375999999988 33,-21.281033999999977 41,-16.201842999999997 C46,-12.08880499999998 25,-8.526651000000015 21,-16.201842 C20,-18.004745000000014 19,-19.389835000000005 18,-20.008031000000017 C16,-23.25796600000001 16,-25.802278 18,-31.685527999999977 C21,-38.576809000000026 28,-29.508447999999987 28,-24.307999999999993 Z" begin="0s" dur="4s" repeatCount="indefinite" />
 
</g>
 
 
<g id="p8" transform="translate(172.000000, 93.000000)">
 
<path d="M190.5,220.5 L66.5,55.5" id="Line-2" stroke="#CECECE" fill="#000000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup"></path>
 
<g id="Group">
 
<circle id="wait" fill="#330000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup" cx="54" cy="54" r="54"></circle>
 
 
<a xlink:href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Toulouse_France/Design#Antifungals">
 
<text id="DESIGN" fill="#ffffff" sketch:type="MSTextLayer" font-family="Helvetica" font-size="11" font-weight="normal">
 
<tspan x="29" y="61" fill="#FFFFFF">Antifungal</tspan>
 
</text>
 
</a>
 
</g>
 
<animateMotion path="M25,-24.657893 C25,-19.457357000000002 21,-2.4715909999999894 28,2.607599999999991 C33,6.720638000000008 25,-8.526651000000015 21,-16.201842 C20,-18.004745000000014 19,-19.389835000000005 18,-20.008031000000017 C16,-23.25796600000001 16,-25.802278 18,-31.685527999999977 C21,-38.576809000000026 25,-29.858429 25,-24.657893 Z" begin="0s" dur="3s" repeatCount="indefinite" />
 
</g>
 
 
 
<g id="p2" transform="translate(323.000000, 59.000000)">
 
<path d="M71.5,245.5 L190.5,0.5" id="Line" stroke="#CECECE" fill="#000000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup"></path>
 
<g id="Group" transform="translate(0.000000, 169.000000)">
 
<circle id="team" fill="#4d0000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup" cx="67.5" cy="67.5" r="67.5"></circle>
 
<a xlink:href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Toulouse_France/Design#Confinement">
 
<text id="RESULT" fill="#ffffff" sketch:type="MSTextLayer" font-family="Helvetica" font-size="13" font-weight="normal">
 
<tspan x="40.5" y="73.5" fill="#FFFFFF">Confinement</tspan>
 
</text>
 
</a>
 
</g>
 
<animateMotion path="M25,-12.043274999999994 C30,-9.31977999999998 29,-8.822219000000018 34,-16.114518999999973 C36,-18.192774999999983 39,-30.690308000000016 36,-33.48888899999997 C32,-36.28747099999998 26,-23.412378999999987 16,-23.412378999999987 C12,-23.412378999999987 15,-38.39289200000002 21,-36.85762399999999 C31,-34.16849000000002 20,-14.766770000000008 25,-12.043274999999994 Z" begin="0s" dur="4s" repeatCount="indefinite" />
 
</g>
 
 
<g id="p4" transform="translate(438.000000, 0.000000)">
 
 
<g id="Group">
 
<circle id="judgement" fill="#660000" sketch:type="MSShapeGroup" cx="77.5" cy="77.5" r="77.5"></circle>
 
<a xlink:href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Toulouse_France/Design#Assembly">
 
<text id="SAFETY" fill="#ffffff" sketch:type="MSTextLayer" font-family="Helvetica" font-size="17.875" font-weight="normal">
 
<tspan x="49.1851852" y="85.4537037" fill="#FFFFFF">Assemby</tspan>
 
</text>
 
</a>
 
</g>
 
<animateMotion path="M28,13.11622299999999 C33,15.839718000000005 31,11.508429999999976 38,16.587621000000013 C44,20.700658999999973 33,35.63191699999999 28,27.956725000000006 C27,26.15382199999999 31,16.587621000000013 21,16.587621000000013 C17,16.587621000000013 13,14.197721999999999 15,8.314472000000023 C18,1.4231909999999743 23,10.392727999999977 28,13.11622299999999 Z" begin="1s" dur="3s" repeatCount="indefinite" />
 
</g>
 
 
</g>
 
</g>
 
</g>
 
</svg>
 
</div>
 
 
</section>
 
</div>
 
 
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://2016.igem.org/Template:Toulouse_France/MAINJS"></script>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size" id="Predation">
+
<div class="column full_size" id="Predation" style="text-align:justify;">
 
<div style="padding-top:30px; padding-left: 10%; padding-right: 10%;">
 
<div style="padding-top:30px; padding-left: 10%; padding-right: 10%;">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
 
 +
 +
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Paleotilis project</p></u>
 +
<p class="texte"> </p>
 +
 +
 
<p align="justify" style="font-size:14px;">
 
<p align="justify" style="font-size:14px;">
 
Developing a biological solution to protect one of the most invaluable humanity heritage is a beautiful challenge. But using a GMO in an unstable ecosystem is a very risky business. For these reasons, our project has been carefully designed from intense discussions with scientists, curators and the public. It was mandatory to ensure the best confinement strategy for our strain, to limit the material input in the cave and to ensure antifungal production only when required. These lead us to <b>divide our project in three modules</b> (Containment, Predation, Antifungal; Figure 1).
 
Developing a biological solution to protect one of the most invaluable humanity heritage is a beautiful challenge. But using a GMO in an unstable ecosystem is a very risky business. For these reasons, our project has been carefully designed from intense discussions with scientists, curators and the public. It was mandatory to ensure the best confinement strategy for our strain, to limit the material input in the cave and to ensure antifungal production only when required. These lead us to <b>divide our project in three modules</b> (Containment, Predation, Antifungal; Figure 1).
Line 114: Line 37:
 
 
 
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
 
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1e/Toulouse_France_designfigure1.png" style="width:70%; margin:20px 20px;"></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/1e/Toulouse_France_designfigure1.png" style="width:40%; margin:20px 20px;">
+
 
<b>  
 
<b>  
 
Figure 1: <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> transformed with the two plasmids carrying the elements necessary to promote predation, to prevent the plasmid dissemination, and to produce antifungals molecules.
 
Figure 1: <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> transformed with the two plasmids carrying the elements necessary to promote predation, to prevent the plasmid dissemination, and to produce antifungals molecules.
 
</b>
 
</b>
<br><br>
+
<br><br>
+
</center>
<b style="font-size:18px;">Predation</b>
+
</p>
<br><br>
+
 
+
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Predation</p></u>
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br>
+
<p class="texte">
 +
 +
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br><br>
 
The Lascaux history has proved that any molecule addition could result in major and unexpected modifications of the cave microbiota. For example, the antifungal molecules abundantly used to fight against fungi infection have been degraded by <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, and this degraded molecules are used by fungi to proliferate… A major constraint we imposed to our project was thus to avoid adding nutriment in the cave.  
 
The Lascaux history has proved that any molecule addition could result in major and unexpected modifications of the cave microbiota. For example, the antifungal molecules abundantly used to fight against fungi infection have been degraded by <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, and this degraded molecules are used by fungi to proliferate… A major constraint we imposed to our project was thus to avoid adding nutriment in the cave.  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br><br>
 
We circumvented this difficulty by taking advantage of the predatory property of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: in starvation condition, one program of <i>Bacillus</i> is to produce toxins to kill other bacteria such as <i>Pseudomonas</i> species and to develop from their materials (Nandy et al, 2007). This has two valuable advantages: (i) no substrate are required when using the bacteria, and (ii) our <i>Bacillus</i> will reduce the deleterious population of <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2011). Besides, <i>Bacillus species</i> are inhabitants of the cave (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2014) and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> is a model microorganisms with well-established genetic possibilities, i.e, the perfect chassis for our project (Figure 2).
 
We circumvented this difficulty by taking advantage of the predatory property of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: in starvation condition, one program of <i>Bacillus</i> is to produce toxins to kill other bacteria such as <i>Pseudomonas</i> species and to develop from their materials (Nandy et al, 2007). This has two valuable advantages: (i) no substrate are required when using the bacteria, and (ii) our <i>Bacillus</i> will reduce the deleterious population of <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2011). Besides, <i>Bacillus species</i> are inhabitants of the cave (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2014) and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> is a model microorganisms with well-established genetic possibilities, i.e, the perfect chassis for our project (Figure 2).
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 146: Line 70:
 
 
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br><br>
 
Two independent operons have been reported to allow for the predation property of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: the  sporulation killing factor (<i>skf</i>) and the sporulation delay protein (<i>sdp</i>) (Gonzalez-Pastor et al, 2003; Ellermeier et al, 2006; Gonzalez-Pastor, 2011). We tried both of them for this project. Since their expression is regulated at the transcriptional level, we decided to replace their promoter by pVeg for a constitutive expression (Figure 3). RFP expression was also added in prevision of a visualisation of the strain during test on stones.
 
Two independent operons have been reported to allow for the predation property of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: the  sporulation killing factor (<i>skf</i>) and the sporulation delay protein (<i>sdp</i>) (Gonzalez-Pastor et al, 2003; Ellermeier et al, 2006; Gonzalez-Pastor, 2011). We tried both of them for this project. Since their expression is regulated at the transcriptional level, we decided to replace their promoter by pVeg for a constitutive expression (Figure 3). RFP expression was also added in prevision of a visualisation of the strain during test on stones.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 159: Line 83:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
+
+
<!-- ######  REFERENCES !!!  ##### -->
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">References </b><br>
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">References </b><br>
 
 
Line 182: Line 106:
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
 
<p align="justify" style="font-size:14px;">
+
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Confinement</p></u>
 
+
<p class="texte">
<br><br>
+
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br><br>
<b style="font-size:18px;">Containment</b>
+
<br><br>
+
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br>
+
 
Our project involved release of a genetically modified bacteria in the cave. Lascaux cave is not a completely closed system; there is interaction with external environment due to water infiltration. The risk to release a GMO in the cave is mainly in the horizontal gene transfer to native bacteria.  
 
Our project involved release of a genetically modified bacteria in the cave. Lascaux cave is not a completely closed system; there is interaction with external environment due to water infiltration. The risk to release a GMO in the cave is mainly in the horizontal gene transfer to native bacteria.  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br><br>
 
We decided for a double toxin-antitoxin system (Figure 4). The idea is to prevent plasmid transfer by having two plasmids that have to remain together or cause lethality.  One plasmid contains antitoxin 1 and toxin 2, the other contains antitoxin 2 and toxin 1.
 
We decided for a double toxin-antitoxin system (Figure 4). The idea is to prevent plasmid transfer by having two plasmids that have to remain together or cause lethality.  One plasmid contains antitoxin 1 and toxin 2, the other contains antitoxin 2 and toxin 1.
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 199: Line 119:
 
 
 
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
 
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/22/Toulouse_France_designfigure4.png" style="width:70%; margin:20px 20px;"></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/22/Toulouse_France_designfigure4.png" style="width:40%; margin:20px 20px;"></center>
 
 
 
<b>
 
<b>
Line 206: Line 126:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br><br>
 
The two pairs of Toxin-Antitoxin combinations selected for this project are MazF/MazE (Bravo et al., 1987, Zhang et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2013) and Zeta/Epsilon (Zielenkiewicz and Cegłowski, 2005 ; Mutschler et al., 2011). The toxin and antitoxin are under control of the pVeg constitutive promoter for <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (BBa_K143012; Figure 5).  
 
The two pairs of Toxin-Antitoxin combinations selected for this project are MazF/MazE (Bravo et al., 1987, Zhang et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2013) and Zeta/Epsilon (Zielenkiewicz and Cegłowski, 2005 ; Mutschler et al., 2011). The toxin and antitoxin are under control of the pVeg constitutive promoter for <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (BBa_K143012; Figure 5).  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 241: Line 161:
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
 
<p align="justify" style="font-size:14px;">
+
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Antifungals</p></u>
 
+
<p class="texte">
<br><br>
+
 
 
<b style="font-size:18px;">Antifungal</b>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br><br>
<br><br>
+
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Context: </b><br>
+
 
The Paleotilis project main idea is to contain the fungi patch progression in the Lascaux cave. Since treating with antifungal molecules has proved to be at the best a limited option, we wonder about how to produce antifungal in a targeted and efficient way.
 
The Paleotilis project main idea is to contain the fungi patch progression in the Lascaux cave. Since treating with antifungal molecules has proved to be at the best a limited option, we wonder about how to produce antifungal in a targeted and efficient way.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our solution: </b><br><br>
 
Since a variety of mould has been identified to cause problem in the cave, we wanted a wide spectrum solution and decided for an antifungal cocktail. 5 different molecules were selected:
 
Since a variety of mould has been identified to cause problem in the cave, we wanted a wide spectrum solution and decided for an antifungal cocktail. 5 different molecules were selected:
 
<br><br>- D4E1, a 17 amino acids synthetic peptide analog to Cecropin B AMPs which has been shown to have antifungal activities by complexing with a sterol present in the conidia’s wall of numerous fungi (De Lucca et al, 1998).  
 
<br><br>- D4E1, a 17 amino acids synthetic peptide analog to Cecropin B AMPs which has been shown to have antifungal activities by complexing with a sterol present in the conidia’s wall of numerous fungi (De Lucca et al, 1998).  
Line 265: Line 181:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">Our constructions: </b><br><br>
 
To simplify the cloning, we designed two genetics modules: Antifungal A and Antifungal B. Antifungal A expresses the cut Metchnikowin and D4E1, while Antifungal B produces entire Metchnikowin, GAFP-1 and Dermaseptin-b1 (figure 6). These two parts were designed to be easily unified as one 5 ORFs operon. For the secretion of these antifungal compounds, we added the AmyE signal peptide in N-terminal of each coding sequences. This peptide is cleaved during the secretion process. The pVeg promoter was used to express the construction during the validation assays. NheI, SacII and SalI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.
 
To simplify the cloning, we designed two genetics modules: Antifungal A and Antifungal B. Antifungal A expresses the cut Metchnikowin and D4E1, while Antifungal B produces entire Metchnikowin, GAFP-1 and Dermaseptin-b1 (figure 6). These two parts were designed to be easily unified as one 5 ORFs operon. For the secretion of these antifungal compounds, we added the AmyE signal peptide in N-terminal of each coding sequences. This peptide is cleaved during the secretion process. The pVeg promoter was used to express the construction during the validation assays. NheI, SacII and SalI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.
 
<br><br>To express the antifungal peptides only in presence of the fungi, we selected the <i>Bacillus</i> promoter of nagA and nagP, reported to be induced in presence of NAG (Bertram et al., 2011). To valid the expression and specificity of these promoters, the RFP reporter gene has been placed under their control (Figure 7). NheI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.
 
<br><br>To express the antifungal peptides only in presence of the fungi, we selected the <i>Bacillus</i> promoter of nagA and nagP, reported to be induced in presence of NAG (Bertram et al., 2011). To valid the expression and specificity of these promoters, the RFP reporter gene has been placed under their control (Figure 7). NheI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.
Line 279: Line 195:
 
 
 
 
<b style="font-size:16px;">References </b><br>
+
<b style="font-size:16px;">References </b><br><br>
 
Bertram R, Rigali S, Wood N, Lulko AT, Kuipers OP & Titgemeyer F (2011) Regulon of the N-acetylglucosamine utilization regulator NagR in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. J. Bacteriol. 193: 3525–3536  
 
Bertram R, Rigali S, Wood N, Lulko AT, Kuipers OP & Titgemeyer F (2011) Regulon of the N-acetylglucosamine utilization regulator NagR in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. J. Bacteriol. 193: 3525–3536  
  
Line 300: Line 216:
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
 
<b style="font-size:18px;">Assembly</b>
+
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Assembly</p></u>
<br><br>All the parts from the three modules were designed to be easily assembled (figure 8). The EcoRI/NheI fragment containing a pNag promoter (figure 7) will have to be swapped with the EcorI/NheI fragment containing the pVeg promoter of the antifungal operon (figure 6). We also designed the toxin/antitoxin systems in a way that one of the toxin gene could be inserted in the middle of the antifungal operon (SacII/SalI insertion, figure 8). The rationale for this was to have the toxin as close as possible to the antifungal molecule to further reduce the risk of antifungal gene horizontal transfer.  
+
<p class="texte">
 +
All the parts from the three modules were designed to be easily assembled (figure 8). The EcoRI/NheI fragment containing a pNag promoter (figure 7) will have to be swapped with the EcorI/NheI fragment containing the pVeg promoter of the antifungal operon (figure 6). We also designed the toxin/antitoxin systems in a way that one of the toxin gene could be inserted in the middle of the antifungal operon (SacII/SalI insertion, figure 8). The rationale for this was to have the toxin as close as possible to the antifungal molecule to further reduce the risk of antifungal gene horizontal transfer.  
  
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
+
<!-- ######  FIGURE  ##### -->
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f2/Toulouse_France_designfigure8.png" style="width:70%; margin:20px 20px;"></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f2/Toulouse_France_designfigure8.png" style="width:70%; margin:20px 20px;"></center>
<b>
+
<b>
Figure 8: final assembly of the parts
+
Figure 8: final assembly of the parts
</b>
+
</b>
 
 
<br><br>Finally, if we decided to use the common <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 168 strain for the modules validation, the final chassis was choosen to be a double mutant Spo0A- recA-. Indeed, lot of sequences are repeated on our plasmids (pVeg, RBS, terminators and backbone for instance). One possibility was to modify the sequences to reduce the homologies intra and between plasmids, or to find other elements and backbones, but it appears to be too complicated in a short delay. We therefore opted for a recA- strain to reduce the recombination capacity of <i>Bacillus</i>. Besides, we do not want our strain to be able of sporulation since this could jeopardize our capacity to neutralize the strain, hence the choice of a Spo0A mutation.
+
<br><br>Finally, if we decided to use the common <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 168 strain for the modules validation, the final chassis was choosen to be a double mutant Spo0A- recA-. Indeed, lot of sequences are repeated on our plasmids (pVeg, RBS, terminators and backbone for instance). One possibility was to modify the sequences to reduce the homologies intra and between plasmids, or to find other elements and backbones, but it appears to be too complicated in a short delay. We therefore opted for a recA- strain to reduce the recombination capacity of <i>Bacillus</i>. Besides, we do not want our strain to be able of sporulation since this could jeopardize our capacity to neutralize the strain, hence the choice of a Spo0A mutation.
<br><br>And now, it is time for results!
+
<br><br>And now, it is time for results!
 
+
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 328: Line 245:
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
<div class="hoc container clear">
 
 
<b style="font-size:18px;">Cloning approach</b>
+
<u><p class="title1" id="select1">Cloning Approach</p></u>
We synthesized our constructions thanks to IDT gblock.  
+
<p class="texte">
<br>These conditions allow us to transform our bacteria with a single plasmid in a media containing 1mM Theophylline.  
+
<br><br>
+
We synthesized our constructions thanks to IDT gblock.  
Strategie globale de clonage
+
<br>These conditions allow us to transform our bacteria with a single plasmid in a media containing 1mM Theophylline.  
Spo0A
+
<br><br>
 
+
Strategie globale de clonage
 +
Spo0A
 +
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 20:43, 17 October 2016

iGEM Toulouse 2016

Project Design

Paleotilis project

Developing a biological solution to protect one of the most invaluable humanity heritage is a beautiful challenge. But using a GMO in an unstable ecosystem is a very risky business. For these reasons, our project has been carefully designed from intense discussions with scientists, curators and the public. It was mandatory to ensure the best confinement strategy for our strain, to limit the material input in the cave and to ensure antifungal production only when required. These lead us to divide our project in three modules (Containment, Predation, Antifungal; Figure 1).

Figure 1: Bacillus subtilis transformed with the two plasmids carrying the elements necessary to promote predation, to prevent the plasmid dissemination, and to produce antifungals molecules.

Predation

Context:

The Lascaux history has proved that any molecule addition could result in major and unexpected modifications of the cave microbiota. For example, the antifungal molecules abundantly used to fight against fungi infection have been degraded by Pseudomonas fluorescens, and this degraded molecules are used by fungi to proliferate… A major constraint we imposed to our project was thus to avoid adding nutriment in the cave.

Our solution:

We circumvented this difficulty by taking advantage of the predatory property of Bacillus subtilis: in starvation condition, one program of Bacillus is to produce toxins to kill other bacteria such as Pseudomonas species and to develop from their materials (Nandy et al, 2007). This has two valuable advantages: (i) no substrate are required when using the bacteria, and (ii) our Bacillus will reduce the deleterious population of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2011). Besides, Bacillus species are inhabitants of the cave (Martin-Sanchez et al, 2014) and Bacillus subtilis is a model microorganisms with well-established genetic possibilities, i.e, the perfect chassis for our project (Figure 2).



Figure 2: In the cave, Pseudomonas species degrade the antifungal molecules previously used to prevent mould apparition. The degraded molecules are paradoxically used by fungal species to develop. Our Bacillus strain will develop from Pseudomonas, and in contact to fungi, will produce antifungal molecules to prevent mould development.

Our constructions:

Two independent operons have been reported to allow for the predation property of Bacillus subtilis: the sporulation killing factor (skf) and the sporulation delay protein (sdp) (Gonzalez-Pastor et al, 2003; Ellermeier et al, 2006; Gonzalez-Pastor, 2011). We tried both of them for this project. Since their expression is regulated at the transcriptional level, we decided to replace their promoter by pVeg for a constitutive expression (Figure 3). RFP expression was also added in prevision of a visualisation of the strain during test on stones.

Figure 3: Predation constructions. SDP is composed of two operons (sdpABC and sdpIR) while SKF is a big operon (skfABCEFGH) of about 6 Kbp. These sequences encodes the necessary elements to produce, mature and secrete the killing factors, as well as the immunity agents to prevent lethality of the producing cells.

References
Ellermeier CD, Errett CH, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, and Losick R (2006) A Three-Protein Signaling Pathway Governing Immunity to a Bacterial Cannibalism Toxin. Cell. 124: 549–59.

González-Pastor JE. (2011). Cannibalism: A Social Behavior in Sporulating Bacillus Subtilis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 35: 415–24.

González-Pastor JE, Errett CH, and Losick R. (2003). Cannibalism by Sporulating Bacteria. Science. 301: 510–13.

Martin-Sanchez PM, Jurado V, Porca E, Bastian F, Lacanette D, Alabouvette C, and Saiz-Jimenez C (2014). Airborne microorganisms in Lascaux Cave (France). International Journal of Speleology. 43:295-303

Martin-Sanchez PM, Bastian F, Nováková A, Porca E, Jurado V, Sanchez-Cortes S, Lopez-and Tobar E (2011) Écologie Microbienne de La Grotte de Lascaux. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257958803_Ecologie_Microbienne_de_la_Grotte_de_Lascaux.

Nandy SK, Prashant M, Bapat PM, and Venkatesh KV (2007). Sporulating Bacteria Prefers Predation to Cannibalism in Mixed Cultures. FEBS Letters. 581: 151–56.

Confinement

Context:

Our project involved release of a genetically modified bacteria in the cave. Lascaux cave is not a completely closed system; there is interaction with external environment due to water infiltration. The risk to release a GMO in the cave is mainly in the horizontal gene transfer to native bacteria.

Our solution:

We decided for a double toxin-antitoxin system (Figure 4). The idea is to prevent plasmid transfer by having two plasmids that have to remain together or cause lethality. One plasmid contains antitoxin 1 and toxin 2, the other contains antitoxin 2 and toxin 1.

Figure 4: concept of the double toxin/antitoxin system.

Our constructions:

The two pairs of Toxin-Antitoxin combinations selected for this project are MazF/MazE (Bravo et al., 1987, Zhang et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2013) and Zeta/Epsilon (Zielenkiewicz and Cegłowski, 2005 ; Mutschler et al., 2011). The toxin and antitoxin are under control of the pVeg constitutive promoter for Bacillus subtilis (BBa_K143012; Figure 5).

Since each fragment contains a toxin but not its corresponding antitoxin, we needed a strategy to avoid cell death during the cloning steps. We chose to use an unusual theophylline sensitive riboswitch to shutdown expression of the toxin when required: In the absence of the ligand, the RBS sequence is available and RNA translation is possible. In ligand presence, RNA shape changes and RBS is no more accessible (Figure 5). It is unusual in the sense theophylline riboswitches usually work in the inverse way (Topp and Gallivan, 2008). The SacII and SalI restriction sites were added to simplify the modules assembly.

Figure 5: toxin/antitoxin constructions for each plasmid

References
Bravo A, de Torrontegui G, and Díaz R (1987). Identification of components of a new stability system of plasmid R1, ParD, that is close to the origin of replication of this plasmid. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210: 101–110.

Mutschler H, Gebhardt M, Shoeman RL, and Meinhart A (2011). A novel mechanism of programmed cell death in bacteria by toxin-antitoxin systems corrupts peptidoglycan synthesis. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001033.

Topp S. and Gallivan JP (2008). Riboswitches in unexpected places—A synthetic riboswitch in a protein coding region. RNA 14: 2498–2503.

Wang X, Lord DM, Hong SH, Peti W, Benedik MJ, Page R, and Wood TK (2013). Type II Toxin/Antitoxin MqsR/MqsA Controls Type V Toxin/Antitoxin GhoT/GhoS. Environ. Microbiol. 15: 1734–1744.

Zhang Y, Zhang J, Hara H, Kato I, and Inouye M. (2005). Insights into the mRNA Cleavage Mechanism by MazF, an mRNA Interferase. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 3143–3150.

Zielenkiewicz U and Cegłowski P (2005). The Toxin-Antitoxin System of the Streptococcal Plasmid pSM19035. J. Bacteriol. 187: 6094–6105.

Antifungals

Context:

The Paleotilis project main idea is to contain the fungi patch progression in the Lascaux cave. Since treating with antifungal molecules has proved to be at the best a limited option, we wonder about how to produce antifungal in a targeted and efficient way.

Our solution:

Since a variety of mould has been identified to cause problem in the cave, we wanted a wide spectrum solution and decided for an antifungal cocktail. 5 different molecules were selected:

- D4E1, a 17 amino acids synthetic peptide analog to Cecropin B AMPs which has been shown to have antifungal activities by complexing with a sterol present in the conidia’s wall of numerous fungi (De Lucca et al, 1998).

- Dermaseptin-b1, a 78 amino acids peptide from Phyllomedusa bicolor which has antifungal activities against filamentus fungus. This peptide is membranotropic and depolarizes the fungi plasma membrane (Fleury et al, 1998).

- GAFP-1 (Gastrodia Anti Fungal Protein 1), a mannose and chitin binding lectin originating from the Asiatic orchid Gastrodia elata, that inhibits the growth of ascomycete and basidiomycete fungal plant pathogens (Wang et al, 2001).

- Metchnikowin, a 26 residus prolin-rich peptid from Drosophilia melanogaster with a broad antifungal spectrum against Ascomycete and Basidiomycete. During its expression, it is cleaved in the endoplasmic reticulum. As we did not know if this cleavage is essential for the antifungal activity, we choose to use either the cut or entire form of this peptide (Levashina et al, 1995).

Besides, we wanted to express these peptides only in close vicinity of the fungi. We therefore investigated the possibility to use Bacillus promoters induced by N-Acetyl-Glucosamine (NAG). This molecule is the major component of chitin found at the surface of the fungi.

Our constructions:

To simplify the cloning, we designed two genetics modules: Antifungal A and Antifungal B. Antifungal A expresses the cut Metchnikowin and D4E1, while Antifungal B produces entire Metchnikowin, GAFP-1 and Dermaseptin-b1 (figure 6). These two parts were designed to be easily unified as one 5 ORFs operon. For the secretion of these antifungal compounds, we added the AmyE signal peptide in N-terminal of each coding sequences. This peptide is cleaved during the secretion process. The pVeg promoter was used to express the construction during the validation assays. NheI, SacII and SalI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.

To express the antifungal peptides only in presence of the fungi, we selected the Bacillus promoter of nagA and nagP, reported to be induced in presence of NAG (Bertram et al., 2011). To valid the expression and specificity of these promoters, the RFP reporter gene has been placed under their control (Figure 7). NheI restrictions sites were added to further facilitate the modules assembly.

Figure 6: Antifungal operons design and assembly

References

Bertram R, Rigali S, Wood N, Lulko AT, Kuipers OP & Titgemeyer F (2011) Regulon of the N-acetylglucosamine utilization regulator NagR in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 193: 3525–3536

De Lucca AJ, Bland JM, Grimm C, Jacks TJ, Cary JW, Jaynes JM, Cleveland TE & Walsh TJ (1998) Fungicidal properties, sterol binding, and proteolytic resistance of the synthetic peptide D4E1. Can. J. Microbiol. 44: 514–520

Fleury Y, Vouille V, Beven L, Amiche M, Wróblewski H, Delfour A & Nicolas P (1998) Synthesis, antimicrobial activity and gene structure of a novel member of the dermaseptin B family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1396: 228–236

Levashina EA, Ohresser S, Bulet P, Reichhart J-M, Hetru C & Hoffmann JA (1995) Metchnikowin, a Novel Immune-Inducible Proline-Rich Peptide from Drosophila with Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 233: 694–700

Wang X, Bauw G, Van Damme EJ, Peumans WJ, Chen ZL, Van Montagu M, Angenon G & Dillen W (2001) Gastrodianin-like mannose-binding proteins: a novel class of plant proteins with antifungal properties. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 25: 651–661

Assembly

All the parts from the three modules were designed to be easily assembled (figure 8). The EcoRI/NheI fragment containing a pNag promoter (figure 7) will have to be swapped with the EcorI/NheI fragment containing the pVeg promoter of the antifungal operon (figure 6). We also designed the toxin/antitoxin systems in a way that one of the toxin gene could be inserted in the middle of the antifungal operon (SacII/SalI insertion, figure 8). The rationale for this was to have the toxin as close as possible to the antifungal molecule to further reduce the risk of antifungal gene horizontal transfer.

Figure 8: final assembly of the parts

Finally, if we decided to use the common Bacillus subtilis 168 strain for the modules validation, the final chassis was choosen to be a double mutant Spo0A- recA-. Indeed, lot of sequences are repeated on our plasmids (pVeg, RBS, terminators and backbone for instance). One possibility was to modify the sequences to reduce the homologies intra and between plasmids, or to find other elements and backbones, but it appears to be too complicated in a short delay. We therefore opted for a recA- strain to reduce the recombination capacity of Bacillus. Besides, we do not want our strain to be able of sporulation since this could jeopardize our capacity to neutralize the strain, hence the choice of a Spo0A mutation.

And now, it is time for results!

Cloning Approach

We synthesized our constructions thanks to IDT gblock.
These conditions allow us to transform our bacteria with a single plasmid in a media containing 1mM Theophylline.

Strategie globale de clonage Spo0A



Contacts