|
|
| (146 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Paris_Saclay}} | + | {{Team:Paris_Saclay/project_header|titre=Human Practices}} |
| − | <html> | + | <html><style>header{background-image: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d4/T--Paris_Saclay--OverviewBanner.jpg");}</style></html> |
| | | | |
| − | <div class="column full_size">
| + | =Overview= |
| | + | Synthetic biology isn’t easy to explain to non-scientists. But explaining the CRISPR-Cas9 technology is way harder. Not only because those matters are complex, but also because we still do not know precisely the consequences of such technologies. If the CRISPR-Cas9 technology is undoubtedly a revolution, the seism affects other fields, interconnected with science (ethics, law and economy as an example). |
| | | | |
| − | <h5> OVERVIEW </h5>
| + | As our project use the CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we looked for its potential huge consequences. It seemed important for us to collect the opinion of scientists, politics, patent attorney, but also of general audience. As we worked on the CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we discovered how overwhelming it could be, and ask ourselves how we could imagine a responsible way to work with this technology. |
| | | | |
| − | <p> Synthetic biology isn’t easy to explain to non-scientists. But explaining CRISPR-Cas9 is way harder. Not only because those matters are complex, but also because we still don’t know precisely the consequences of such technologies. If CRISPR-Cas 9 is undoubtedly a revolution, the seism affects other fields, interconnected with science (ethics or law as an example). </p>
| + | Thus, we tried to find an answer in the concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI). We believe that this concept could help iGEM teams to think about responsibility in their project, and have the strongest link possible between their project and the societal need they want to reach. In other words, we wanted to bring innovation and societal need closer. Considering our project on the CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we believed the concept could give us the good questions we should ask ourselves to build a responsible project. |
| | | | |
| − | <p> As our project use CRISPR-Cas9 we looked for its potential huge consequences. It seemed important for us to collect the opinion of both scientists and non scientists. As we worked on CRISPR-Cas9, we discovered how overwhelming it could be, and ask ourselves how we could imagine a responsible way to work with this technology. </p>
| + | This lead us to investigate about the CRISPR-Cas9 technology and its major consequences in several fields. We tried to draw the consequences and think about what would be a responsible use for scientists but also considering the societal issues. Our Human Practices followed two goals: researching among stakeholders what would be a responsible use, and popularising science for public. To see our researches on the societal issues of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, click [[Team:Paris_Saclay/HP/Silver|here]]. |
| | | | |
| − | <p> Thus, we tried to find an answer in the concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI). We believe that this concept could help iGEM teams to think about responsability in their project. Considering our project on CRISPR-Cas9, we believed the concept could give us the good questions we should ask ourselves to build a responsible project. As their is no general responsible rules than can be applied to all project we developed a RRI test : this test works as a feed-back for each iGEM projects, in order to improve the responsability in the long term. </p>
| + | As there is no general responsible rules than can be applied to all project we developed a "Responsible Research and Innovation test": this test works as a feed-back for each iGEM projects, in order to improve the responsibility in the long term. Thus, we gave this test to iGEM teams from all over the world, and collected their answers, in order to have the best picture of the respect of RRI principles by iGEM teams. |
| | | | |
| − | <p> A feed-back on the responsability in a project on CRISPR-Cas9 can give a personal experience about the problematics the project met, and a quick overview on how we could deal with them. </p>
| + | A feed-back on the responsibility in a project on the CRISPR-Cas9 technology can give a personal experience about the problematics the project met, and a quick overview on how we could deal with them. To see how we think about the RRI Test, our answer to it, and the answers of iGEM teams all over the world, click [[Team:Paris_Saclay/HP/Gold|here]]. |
| | | | |
| | + | See the RRI test: [[Media:T--Paris_Saclay--RRI_Test5.pdf|here]] |
| | | | |
| − | | + | {{Team:Paris_Saclay/project_footer}} |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <p>iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
| + | |
| − | <p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
| + | |
| − | <p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>.</p>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <div class="column half_size">
| + | |
| − | <div class="highlight">
| + | |
| − | <h5>Note</h5>
| + | |
| − | <p>You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Awards">awards</a> for Human Practices:</p>
| + | |
| − | <ul>
| + | |
| − | <li>Human Practices silver medal criterion</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Human Practices gold medal criterion</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Best Integrated Human Practices award</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Best Education and Public Engagement award</li>
| + | |
| − | </ul>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <div class="column half_size">
| + | |
| − | <h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
| + | |
| − | <ul>
| + | |
| − | <li>Philosophy</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Education</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Product Design</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Environmental Impact</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Ethics</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Safety</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Security</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Public Policy</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Law and Regulation</li>
| + | |
| − | <li>Risk Assessment</li>
| + | |
| − | </ul>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <div class="column half_size">
| + | |
| − | <h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
| + | |
| − | <p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).</p>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <div class="column half_size">
| + | |
| − | <h5>Inspiration</h5>
| + | |
| − | <p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
| + | |
| − | <ul>
| + | |
| − | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
| + | |
| − | <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
| + | |
| − | <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
| + | |
| − | <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
| + | |
| − | </ul>
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | </html>
| + | |
