(→Guideline of the project) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
In the laboratory, we focused on the tool used to visualize the interaction between both dCas9s. For that purpose, we designed a biobrick in order to characterize the assembly of the split GFP. This biobrick is composed of one part of the FRB / FKBP12 system fused to the other part of the tripartite split-GFP system (GFP 10 / GFP 11) plus GFP 1.9 in the same plasmid. | In the laboratory, we focused on the tool used to visualize the interaction between both dCas9s. For that purpose, we designed a biobrick in order to characterize the assembly of the split GFP. This biobrick is composed of one part of the FRB / FKBP12 system fused to the other part of the tripartite split-GFP system (GFP 10 / GFP 11) plus GFP 1.9 in the same plasmid. | ||
− | Furthermore, a model was built in order to determine the optimal distance between the two dCas9s proteins for the GFP to fluoresce. This model was based on two devices: the pSB1C3 plasmid composed of the tripatrite split GFP plus two dCas9s and another plasmid composed of the two target sequences of the dCas9 and the two sgRNAs coding | + | Furthermore, a model was built in order to determine the optimal distance between the two dCas9s proteins for the GFP to fluoresce. This model was based on two devices: the pSB1C3 plasmid composed of the tripatrite split GFP plus two dCas9s and another plasmid composed of the two target sequences of the dCas9 and the two sgRNAs coding sequences. For this second plasmid, we wanted to test several distances (50 bp, 75 bp, 100 bp and 150 bp) between the two target sequences of the dCas9s, in order to determine the best distance for the tripartite split GFP to fluoresce. |
=Perspective= | =Perspective= | ||
− | In this project we design a tool to study the relation between DNA structure and gene expression. | + | In this project we design a tool to study the relation between DNA structure and gene expression. We propose many applications of our tool in genome study and in industry. Using dCas9 in this system gives us the advantage of specifically targeting the desired sequence and changing DNA structure. Indeed, it would be possible to design specific sgRNA to target specific sequences. |
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=Achievements= | =Achievements= | ||
<html><style>.green{color:green;}</style></html> | <html><style>.green{color:green;}</style></html> | ||
+ | |||
====Bronze==== | ====Bronze==== | ||
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">'''[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?id=2039 Register for iGEM]''', have a great summer, and attend the Giant Jamboree.</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">Meet all deliverables on the Requirements page.</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">Create a page on your team wiki with clear attribution of each aspect of your project.</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">'''[https://2016.igem.org/Team:Paris_Saclay/Parts#Parts_designed_for_the_project Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part]''' or Device central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines). </span> |
====Silver==== | ====Silver==== | ||
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="violet">Experimentally validate that at least '''[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2039000 one new BioBrick Part]''' or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. Document the characterization of this part in the Main Page section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry. This working part must be different from the part documented in bronze medal criterion. '''[IN PROGRESS]'''</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">Convince the judges you have '''[https://2016.igem.org/Team:Paris_Saclay/Collaborations helped any registered iGEM team]''' from high school, a different track, another university, or another institution in a significant way.</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the lab bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, and intellectual property rights. '''[https://2016.igem.org/Team:Paris_Saclay/HP/Silver Demonstrate how your team has identified, investigated, and addressed]''' one or more of these issues in the context of your project.</span> |
====Gold==== | ====Gold==== | ||
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">'''[https://2016.igem.org/Team:Paris_Saclay/HP/Gold Human Practice]''': expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the design and/or execution of your project.</span> |
− | # <span class=" | + | # <span class="black">Improve the function OR '''[https://2016.igem.org/Team:Paris_Saclay/Description#2014_PROJECT characterization]''' of an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the Registry. Please see the Registry help page on how to document a contribution to an existing part.</span> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
{{Team:Paris_Saclay/footer}} | {{Team:Paris_Saclay/footer}} |
Latest revision as of 22:19, 19 October 2016