Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Hardware"

 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<h2>Design of Hardware</h2>
 
<h2>Design of Hardware</h2>
<p><center><i> “Design, and build, a modular easy-to-assemble kit to illustrate our research in the field of bio-electronics to students of high school age.” - Newcastle iGEM 2016</i></center></p>
+
<p><center><i> “Design, and build, a modular easy-to-assemble kit to illustrate our research in the field of bio-electronics to students of high school age and facilitate further study.” - Newcastle iGEM 2016</i></center></p>
  
 
<h2>The Breadboard</h2>
 
<h2>The Breadboard</h2>
Line 28: Line 28:
 
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/96/T--Newcastle--breadboarddrawing.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 3: An early design draft of our breadboard."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/96/T--Newcastle--breadboarddrawing.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 3: An early design draft of our breadboard.</figcaption></figure></p>
 
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/96/T--Newcastle--breadboarddrawing.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 3: An early design draft of our breadboard."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/96/T--Newcastle--breadboarddrawing.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 3: An early design draft of our breadboard.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5b/T--Newcastle--crosspiece.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 4: An early design draft of our microfluidic device."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5b/T--Newcastle--crosspiece.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 4: An early design draft of our microfluidic device.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5b/T--Newcastle--crosspiece.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 4: An early design draft of the piece which would house our microfluidic devices."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5b/T--Newcastle--crosspiece.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 4: An early design draft of the piece which would house our microfluidic devices.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 
<p>In keeping with our previous stud-based design, we opted to use a series of nodes attached to bases, which were magnetised. This meant that depending on the circuits they wished to build; the bases could be rearranged in space, with strong connections between segments to ensure stability. All connector pieces and components used the same form factor based on these small-but-powerful round magnets, which guarantee stable conduction. Copper tape was soldered to each magnet and used to conduct across plastic connector pieces.</p>
 
<p>In keeping with our previous stud-based design, we opted to use a series of nodes attached to bases, which were magnetised. This meant that depending on the circuits they wished to build; the bases could be rearranged in space, with strong connections between segments to ensure stability. All connector pieces and components used the same form factor based on these small-but-powerful round magnets, which guarantee stable conduction. Copper tape was soldered to each magnet and used to conduct across plastic connector pieces.</p>
  
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/56/T--Newcastle--partscut.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 5: Some of the breadboard components lasercut and ready to assemble!"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/56/T--Newcastle--partscut.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 5: Some of our breadboard components being lasercut and ready to assemble!</figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Newcastle--boardmagnets.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 5. The stud-based magnetic breadboard design. It was visually appealing but did not guarantee a stable connection."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Newcastle--boardmagnets.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 5. The stud-based magnetic breadboard design. It was visually appealing but did not guarantee a stable connection.</figcaption></figure></p>
 
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Newcastle--boardmagnets.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 6: The ball magnet based design for our breadboard - looks cool, but gave poor stability."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/34/T--Newcastle--boardmagnets.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 6: The ball magnet based design for our breadboard - looks cool, but gave poor stability.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
  
 
<p>In testing, it transpired that although the magnetic nodes were visually appealing, they also contained small manufacturing inconsistencies. These inconsistencies meant we could not always get the stable connection we needed to deliver the electricity for heat shock. From this finding, the final iteration of the design was born.</p>
 
<p>In testing, it transpired that although the magnetic nodes were visually appealing, they also contained small manufacturing inconsistencies. These inconsistencies meant we could not always get the stable connection we needed to deliver the electricity for heat shock. From this finding, the final iteration of the design was born.</p>
Line 40: Line 38:
 
<p>Now we are using 8 mm neodymium disc magnets for our design, which are powerful but most importantly completely smooth, with the copper-magnet join taking place away from the connection surface. Finally, we had achieved the perfect current delivery method, and adapted all our pre-existing models and diagrams to incorporate the magnets.</p>
 
<p>Now we are using 8 mm neodymium disc magnets for our design, which are powerful but most importantly completely smooth, with the copper-magnet join taking place away from the connection surface. Finally, we had achieved the perfect current delivery method, and adapted all our pre-existing models and diagrams to incorporate the magnets.</p>
  
<p>During our experiments we had been using a <a href="http://www.bio-rad.com/en-uk/product/powerpac-basic-power-supply">Bio-Rad PowerPac Basic</a> to supply electricity. Given the short time available to us we would have liked to develop our own variable PSU design, but for now, we have opted to make adapters that will allow multiple types of bench supply to work with our breadboard system. These adapters are included in the kit.</p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b8/T--Newcastle--breadboardfinal.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 6: The final design of our breadboard, which uses neodymium magnets to link the base units together (as pictured) and the bioelectronic components themselves above the base."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b8/T--Newcastle--breadboardfinal.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 6: The final design of our breadboard, which uses neodymium magnets to link the base units together (as pictured) and the bioelectronic components themselves above the base</figcaption></figure></p>
  
<p>The parts for the kit can be produced using common equipment available at your local fabrication laboratory -  we recommend finding your nearest FabLab initiative! Once cut, all the structures can be joined together using two-part resin. If ordering all the parts yourself, try using less powerful magnets (WE USED XX) as they had a nasty habit of ripping other components apart during our testing! </p>
+
<p>During our experiments we had been using a <a href="http://www.bio-rad.com/en-uk/product/powerpac-basic-power-supply">Bio-Rad PowerPac Basic</a> to supply electricity. Given the short time available to us we would have liked to develop our own variable PSU design and would love to see a team solve this problem in the future!</p>
  
<p>Of course, we intended from the beginning for our designs to be freely available and modified - we have included a thumb drive with every single lasercutting profile and 3D models required to build your own kits, along with the relevant documentation. These files are also downloadable from the filestore on this wiki at the link HERE. We’d love to see what new parts you can come up with and integrate into the system. As the field of synthetic biology evolves, so can the system!
+
<p>The parts for the kit can be produced using common equipment available at your local fabrication laboratory - we recommend finding your nearest FabLab initiative! Once cut, all the structures can be joined together using two-part resin. Tip: If ordering all the parts yourself, try using less powerful magnets (we used N35 neodymium magnets with 1.47kg of pull force) as they had a nasty habit of ripping other components apart during our testing!</p>
</p>
+
 
 +
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/T--Newcastle--connector.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 7: Magnetic connectors used to link independent components on the breadboard. In this design, two magnets are connected by a plastic bridge piece and made electrically conductive via copper tape which is soldered to the side of each magnet."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/T--Newcastle--connector.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 7: Magnetic connectors used to link independent components on the breadboard. In this design, two magnets are connected by a plastic bridge piece and made electrically conductive via copper tape which is soldered to the side of each magnet.</figcaption></figure></p>
 +
 
 +
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e3/T--Newcastle--rasppi.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 8: We used the Raspberry Pi touchscreen kindly donated to us by Proto-Pic to develop an interactive activity to accompany our kit, which highlights several synthetic biology research projects going on around the world."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e3/T--Newcastle--rasppi.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 8: We used the Raspberry Pi touchscreen kindly donated to us by Proto-Pic to develop an interactive activity to accompany our kit, which highlights several synthetic biology research projects going on around the world.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 
<h2>Microfluidic Microbial Fuel Cell</h2>
 
<h2>Microfluidic Microbial Fuel Cell</h2>
Line 52: Line 53:
 
<p>Designing our new fuel cell was a challenging experience, but one that we feel yielded strong results. From our experiments using the <a href="http://www.store.reading.ac.uk/browse/extra_info.asp?compid=2&modid=1&catid=159&prodid=1292">University of Reading's microbial fuel cell kit</a>, we wondered if the entire system could be made smaller and integrated into our breadboard but still provide measurable voltage output. To deconstruct the kit, it consists at a basic level of two separate chambers, separated by a cation exchange membrane and an electrode running into each chamber.</p>
 
<p>Designing our new fuel cell was a challenging experience, but one that we feel yielded strong results. From our experiments using the <a href="http://www.store.reading.ac.uk/browse/extra_info.asp?compid=2&modid=1&catid=159&prodid=1292">University of Reading's microbial fuel cell kit</a>, we wondered if the entire system could be made smaller and integrated into our breadboard but still provide measurable voltage output. To deconstruct the kit, it consists at a basic level of two separate chambers, separated by a cation exchange membrane and an electrode running into each chamber.</p>
  
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/2a/T--Newcastle--fuelcells.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 7: Standard microbial fuel cells consist of two chambers separated by a cation exchange system."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/2a/T--Newcastle--fuelcells.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 7: Standard microbial fuel cells consist of two chambers separated by a cation exchange system.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/2a/T--Newcastle--fuelcells.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 9: Standard microbial fuel cells consist of two chambers separated by a cation exchange system."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/2a/T--Newcastle--fuelcells.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 9: Standard microbial fuel cells consist of two chambers separated by a cation exchange system.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 
<p>Having already used PDMS gel moulding to construct our basic genetic construct chambers, we wanted to make use of the existing protocols and expertise afforded to us by <a href="http://www.ncl.ac.uk/computing/people/profile/lucyeland.html#background">Dr Lucy Eland</a>. With this in mind, we designed a new model to pour the gel around and had this 3D printed. While unfortunately due to some calculation errors the first prints were far too small, the second run was correctly sized and we were successful in creating a miniaturised fuel cell, sealed by bonding to a glass slide as per our other PDMS devices.</p>
 
<p>Having already used PDMS gel moulding to construct our basic genetic construct chambers, we wanted to make use of the existing protocols and expertise afforded to us by <a href="http://www.ncl.ac.uk/computing/people/profile/lucyeland.html#background">Dr Lucy Eland</a>. With this in mind, we designed a new model to pour the gel around and had this 3D printed. While unfortunately due to some calculation errors the first prints were far too small, the second run was correctly sized and we were successful in creating a miniaturised fuel cell, sealed by bonding to a glass slide as per our other PDMS devices.</p>
  
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--Newcastle--standardmould.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 8: The metallic moulds used to form our standard construct devices - the raised portion forms the central injection chamber."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--Newcastle--standardmould.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 8: The metallic moulds used to form our standard construct devices - the raised portion forms the central injection chamber.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--Newcastle--standardmould.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 10: The metallic moulds used to form our standard construct devices - the raised portion forms the central injection chamber. This design comes from the 2012 single-cell chemostat paper by Moffitt, Lee and Cluzel"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--Newcastle--standardmould.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 10: The metallic moulds used to form our standard construct devices - the raised portion forms the central injection chamber. This design comes from the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395180">2012 single-cell chemostat paper</a> by Moffitt, Lee and Cluzel</figcaption></figure></p>
 
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Newcastle--fuelcellmoulding.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 9: PDMS gel poured around our 3D printed model (yellow) undergoing curing within a tape boundary."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Newcastle--fuelcellmoulding.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 9: PDMS gel poured around our 3D printed model (yellow) undergoing curing within a tape boundary.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
 
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/29/T--Newcastle--fuelcelldone.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 10: A successful mould, giving the requisite two separate internal chambers and a slot for insertion of cation exchange material"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/29/T--Newcastle--fuelcelldone.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 10: A successful mould, giving the requisite two separate internal chambers and a slot for insertion of cation exchange material.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
 
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f0/T--Newcastle--microfuelcellactive.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 11: The miniature fuel cell complete with platinum electrodes and chemicals within its chambers, ready to be connected and provide current."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f0/T--Newcastle--microfuelcellactive.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 11: The miniature fuel cell complete with platinum electrodes and chemicals within its chambers, ready to be connected and provide current.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
  
 +
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Newcastle--fuelcellmoulding.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 11: PDMS gel poured around our 3D printed model (yellow) undergoing curing within a tape boundary."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Newcastle--fuelcellmoulding.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 11: PDMS gel poured around our 3D printed model (yellow) undergoing curing within a tape boundary.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Newcastle--proof3.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 12: The microfluidics "light bulb" component complete with platinum electrodes and <i>E. coli</i> and LB with chloramphenicol within its chambers, ready to be connected and provide fluroescence when induced by the heat from an electrical current."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Newcastle--proof3.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 12: The microfluidics "light bulb" component complete with platinum electrodes and <i>E. coli</i> and LB with chloramphenicol within its chambers, ready to be connected to our breadboard and provide fluorescence when induced by the heat from an electrical current.</figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/29/T--Newcastle--fuelcelldone.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="Figure 12: A successful mould, giving the requisite two separate internal chambers and a slot for insertion of cation exchange material"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/29/T--Newcastle--fuelcelldone.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 12: A successful mould, giving the requisite two separate internal chambers and a slot for insertion of cation exchange material.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 +
<p><figure><a="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Newcastle--proof3.png" data-lightbox="img" data-title="some text"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Newcastle--proof3.png" width=100% /></a><figcaption>Figure 13: The microfluidics "light bulb" component complete with platinum electrodes and <i>E. coli</i> and LB with chloramphenicol within its chambers, ready to be connected to our breadboard and provide fluorescence when induced by the heat from an electrical current.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 
<figure><IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/39/Fuel_cell_part.png" ALT="some text" WIDTH=650 HEIGHT=650>
 
<figure><IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/39/Fuel_cell_part.png" ALT="some text" WIDTH=650 HEIGHT=650>
  
<p> <figcaption>Figure 13. Our final fuel cell part ready to be placed <em>in situ</em> on our breadboard </figcaption></figure></p>
+
<p> <figcaption>Figure 14. Our final fuel cell part ready to be placed <em>in situ</em> on our breadboard.</figcaption></figure></p>
  
 
<p>It was fantastic to see this particular device come to life over the course of the summer, as were able to design both the physical form and the genetic insert for the bacteria by improving on the past work of the <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Project/MFC"> 2013 Bielefeld iGEM team</a>. For more details on how our microbial fuel cell performed, <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Proof/MFC">please click this link to see our results.</a></p>
 
<p>It was fantastic to see this particular device come to life over the course of the summer, as were able to design both the physical form and the genetic insert for the bacteria by improving on the past work of the <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Project/MFC"> 2013 Bielefeld iGEM team</a>. For more details on how our microbial fuel cell performed, <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Proof/MFC">please click this link to see our results.</a></p>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 03:07, 20 October 2016

Design of Hardware

“Design, and build, a modular easy-to-assemble kit to illustrate our research in the field of bio-electronics to students of high school age and facilitate further study.” - Newcastle iGEM 2016

The Breadboard

Beginning with the above specification, we drafted up some initial designs that used press-together studs as their connection/conduction mechanism. This idea was inspired by the John Adams 'Hot Wires' Plug & Play Electronics set and other such ‘easy-build’ systems. We also reached out to John Adams to discuss features that make their products so successful within their target demographic.

As advertised on the John Adams website, these products are designed to reinforce ideas already taught as part of the United Kingdom national curriculum. However, with our project, we hope to explore entirely ‘new ground’ for end users. Currently, synthetic biology receives little to no mention before the final year of A levels in the UK, at age 17/18. Due to this, it was decided we would need attractive packaging and targeted advertising on pre-watershed TV to raise awareness and generate pester power. Above all, it was stressed that, due to the growing array of toy safety requirements, science-based products are becoming more expensive to develop. Potentially, the lack of domain-specific products prevents people from having the opportunity to explore (and become interested in) particular areas of science. These issues were given great thought, not least due to the public’s largely negative connotations associated with genetically modified (GM) organisms. It was deemed, we had to ensure, and advertised as so, that our system was as safe as possible.

We then gave a presentation about the iGEM competition and our project to groups of sixth form students across two open days. During the event, we presented our ideas as well as the Hot Wires kits along with two other variants and asked them for feedback on the products. We wanted to establish what they liked and features that could be improved, recording this information and feeding into our design rationale. Use of bright colours and clear labelling received unanimous praise, while snap-together studs were rejected as too fiddly. It was this observation that made us decide to pursue a magnetised system, using coloured perspex to ensure the kit was visually stimulating.

Figure 1: We gave the sixth formers existing electronics kits and asked their opinions to inform and improve our designs.

Figure 2: One of the sixth form teams presenting their iGEM ideas. Getting the sixth formers to come up with their own iGEM projects was a great way to see what ethical concerns they considered to be important.

We wanted to produce a series of interchangeable parts that could house the hardwire required to activate the heat shock response within our bacteria contained in the microfluidic chambers. While also maintaining user-friendly functionality and an aesthetically pleasing product. This would allow for easy experiment preparation and consistency in any observations, as we would include all laser cut and 3D model designs for free.

Figure 3: An early design draft of our breadboard.

Figure 4: An early design draft of the piece which would house our microfluidic devices.

In keeping with our previous stud-based design, we opted to use a series of nodes attached to bases, which were magnetised. This meant that depending on the circuits they wished to build; the bases could be rearranged in space, with strong connections between segments to ensure stability. All connector pieces and components used the same form factor based on these small-but-powerful round magnets, which guarantee stable conduction. Copper tape was soldered to each magnet and used to conduct across plastic connector pieces.

Figure 5. The stud-based magnetic breadboard design. It was visually appealing but did not guarantee a stable connection.

In testing, it transpired that although the magnetic nodes were visually appealing, they also contained small manufacturing inconsistencies. These inconsistencies meant we could not always get the stable connection we needed to deliver the electricity for heat shock. From this finding, the final iteration of the design was born.

Now we are using 8 mm neodymium disc magnets for our design, which are powerful but most importantly completely smooth, with the copper-magnet join taking place away from the connection surface. Finally, we had achieved the perfect current delivery method, and adapted all our pre-existing models and diagrams to incorporate the magnets.

Figure 6: The final design of our breadboard, which uses neodymium magnets to link the base units together (as pictured) and the bioelectronic components themselves above the base

During our experiments we had been using a Bio-Rad PowerPac Basic to supply electricity. Given the short time available to us we would have liked to develop our own variable PSU design and would love to see a team solve this problem in the future!

The parts for the kit can be produced using common equipment available at your local fabrication laboratory - we recommend finding your nearest FabLab initiative! Once cut, all the structures can be joined together using two-part resin. Tip: If ordering all the parts yourself, try using less powerful magnets (we used N35 neodymium magnets with 1.47kg of pull force) as they had a nasty habit of ripping other components apart during our testing!

Figure 7: Magnetic connectors used to link independent components on the breadboard. In this design, two magnets are connected by a plastic bridge piece and made electrically conductive via copper tape which is soldered to the side of each magnet.

Figure 8: We used the Raspberry Pi touchscreen kindly donated to us by Proto-Pic to develop an interactive activity to accompany our kit, which highlights several synthetic biology research projects going on around the world.

Microfluidic Microbial Fuel Cell

You can download the 3D model to mould your own miniature microbial fuel cell here

Designing our new fuel cell was a challenging experience, but one that we feel yielded strong results. From our experiments using the University of Reading's microbial fuel cell kit, we wondered if the entire system could be made smaller and integrated into our breadboard but still provide measurable voltage output. To deconstruct the kit, it consists at a basic level of two separate chambers, separated by a cation exchange membrane and an electrode running into each chamber.

Figure 9: Standard microbial fuel cells consist of two chambers separated by a cation exchange system.

Having already used PDMS gel moulding to construct our basic genetic construct chambers, we wanted to make use of the existing protocols and expertise afforded to us by Dr Lucy Eland. With this in mind, we designed a new model to pour the gel around and had this 3D printed. While unfortunately due to some calculation errors the first prints were far too small, the second run was correctly sized and we were successful in creating a miniaturised fuel cell, sealed by bonding to a glass slide as per our other PDMS devices.

Figure 10: The metallic moulds used to form our standard construct devices - the raised portion forms the central injection chamber. This design comes from the 2012 single-cell chemostat paper by Moffitt, Lee and Cluzel

Figure 11: PDMS gel poured around our 3D printed model (yellow) undergoing curing within a tape boundary.

Figure 12: A successful mould, giving the requisite two separate internal chambers and a slot for insertion of cation exchange material.

Figure 13: The microfluidics "light bulb" component complete with platinum electrodes and E. coli and LB with chloramphenicol within its chambers, ready to be connected to our breadboard and provide fluorescence when induced by the heat from an electrical current.

some text

Figure 14. Our final fuel cell part ready to be placed in situ on our breadboard.

It was fantastic to see this particular device come to life over the course of the summer, as were able to design both the physical form and the genetic insert for the bacteria by improving on the past work of the 2013 Bielefeld iGEM team. For more details on how our microbial fuel cell performed, please click this link to see our results.