(→Tripartit Split-GFP and FRB-FKBP12 dimerization systems) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Tripartit Split-GFP and FRB-FKBP12 dimerization systems== | ==Tripartit Split-GFP and FRB-FKBP12 dimerization systems== | ||
− | Preliminary we | + | Preliminary, we designed two biobricks to test the FRB*/FKBP12 interaction and the tripartite GFP system. FRB* was fused with one subunit of GFP (GFP 11) and FKBP12 was fused with another one (GFP10). Then, we also put the GFP 1.9 gene in pSB1C3 to form the tripartite. |
[[Image:Image4design.jpg|frameless|upright=2.5|center|]] | [[Image:Image4design.jpg|frameless|upright=2.5|center|]] | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Assessment of the minimal distance to have fluorescence== | ==Assessment of the minimal distance to have fluorescence== | ||
− | One of the goal of our project is to assess the system BDC tool with the tripartite split-GFP. | + | One of the goal of our project is to assess the system BDC tool with the tripartite split-GFP. To assess the effect of the bring DNA closer tool, we have to know the minimal distance needed to such fluorescence emission. |
− | To assess the effect of the bring DNA closer tool, we have to know the minimal distance needed to such fluorescence emission. | + | |
− | This question was also the core of our [[Team:Paris_Saclay/Model#modelisation| | + | This question was also the core of our [[Team:Paris_Saclay/Model#modelisation|model]], which answers the question: ''What is the optimal distance between the two dCas9s for fluorescence?'' |
− | This question is essential because the distance between the dCas9 may cause major problems. First, the steric hindrance and the dCas9 footprint may avoid the GFP assembling if we target sequences too close. | + | This question is essential because the distance between the dCas9 may cause major problems. First, the steric hindrance and the dCas9 footprint may avoid the GFP assembling if we target sequences are too close. Secondly, the protein sizes we chose avoid GFP assembling if there are too far away. As a result, fluorescence emission would be detect only if the proteins, as well as the DNA regions, are distant between a precise range of distance. |
− | To assess experimentally such distant, | + | To assess experimentally such distant, we decided to design different plasmids containing the visualization target sequences separate from each other with different distances. To do so, we designed specific primers to carry out PCR and obtain, from a plasmid in which the target sequences are distant with 1kB, different plasmids. |
This plasmid would have been express with the composite biobrick composed of the BioBricks 3, 4 and 5. | This plasmid would have been express with the composite biobrick composed of the BioBricks 3, 4 and 5. | ||
− | The target sequence would have been | + | The target sequence would have been separated from: |
*1kB | *1kB | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
==Assessment of the DNA regions brought closer== | ==Assessment of the DNA regions brought closer== | ||
− | In order to test our BDC tool, all the biobricks should been | + | In order to test our BDC tool, all the biobricks should been expressed in ''E. coli'', as well as all the sgRNAs corresponding to each dCas9s. After, the team would measure GFP fluorescence variations with and without rapalog. |
[[File:T--Paris_Saclay--BDCtool_characterization.jpeg|frameless|center|upright=2.5|]] | [[File:T--Paris_Saclay--BDCtool_characterization.jpeg|frameless|center|upright=2.5|]] | ||
Line 46: | Line 45: | ||
=Gene expression tests= | =Gene expression tests= | ||
− | In order to test a possible influence of the spatial proximity in gene expression | + | |
+ | In order to test a possible influence of the spatial proximity in gene expression, we would test the expression of two different reporter genes. With the aim of having more accurate variation measurements, we should use enzymes as luciferase and Beta-Galactosidase for instance. | ||
{{Team:Paris_Saclay/project_footer}} | {{Team:Paris_Saclay/project_footer}} |
Revision as of 14:04, 9 October 2016