Alexandra m (Talk | contribs) |
Alexandra m (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="col-sm-12"> | <div class="col-sm-12"> | ||
<div class="banner_title"> | <div class="banner_title"> | ||
− | <h1>CelloCad</h1> | + | <h1 id="back_to_the_top">CelloCad</h1> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
<div class="scroll_area"> | <div class="scroll_area"> | ||
<div class="sroll_top"> | <div class="sroll_top"> | ||
− | <a href="# | + | <a href="#back_to_the_top"> <i class="zmdi zmdi-chevron-up btn waves-effect"> </i> </a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 20:29, 16 October 2016
Cello is a newly created software, allowing plasmid optimization through powerful bioinformatics tools. It was described in 2016 in “Genetic Circuit Design Automation” (Nielsen et al.), and is freely available here
The CelloCad takes a genetic construction as an input, and gives as an output the best possible plasmid for this genetic construction. We heard about Cello through one of our advisors, and were immediately appealed by the characterization possibilities of such a software. We wanted to design an enhanced version of our biosensor plasmid, and then compare its properties (detection range, response rapidity…) to the one we designed ourselves. However, we encountered a major issue during the realization of this side-projects: in order for the software to work, we needed to know the RPU (Relative Promoter Unit) of our promoters. This RPU method is fairly recent, and no RPU database currently exists. We therefore wanted to determine by ourselves the RPU for the two promoters used in our biosensor, (Pr and Pu), and maybe add our results as the beginning of a crowdsourced RPU database. In order to perform this experiment, we designed
CelloCAD Plasmid Optimization
Our team wanted to work with the Cello software in order to try to optimize our plasmid. Though we may not have the most complex genetic circuit, we were interested in the possible outcomes of such an experiment.