Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 232: Line 232:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</html>
 
</html>
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Cpx_pH_Culture_Tubes_2.png|thumb|right|600px| Figure 1. Testing the CpxR Construct in pH 6-9. From left to right is Control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on".]]
+
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Cpx_pH_Culture_Tubes_2.png|thumb|left|600px| Figure 1. Testing the CpxR Construct in pH 6-9. From left to right is Control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on".]]
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
+
<div class="column half_size">
 
<p>The order from left to right is control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on". The main point is that the Control at pH 6 has more expression of the yellow-green chromoprotein than the Experimental at pH 6. The pH-Dependent promoter of the Experimental group is down-regulated at pH 6 whereas the control is not. Also, there is an increase in YGCP expression between the Experiment pH 7 and pH 8 that is not seen in the Control between pH 7 and pH 8. The normalized data is below shows the relative expression of YGCP. The construct can be found on the iGEM registry as: <a href=“http://parts.igem.org/Part:Bba_K2097000”>BBa_K2097000</a>.</p>
 
<p>The order from left to right is control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on". The main point is that the Control at pH 6 has more expression of the yellow-green chromoprotein than the Experimental at pH 6. The pH-Dependent promoter of the Experimental group is down-regulated at pH 6 whereas the control is not. Also, there is an increase in YGCP expression between the Experiment pH 7 and pH 8 that is not seen in the Control between pH 7 and pH 8. The normalized data is below shows the relative expression of YGCP. The construct can be found on the iGEM registry as: <a href=“http://parts.igem.org/Part:Bba_K2097000”>BBa_K2097000</a>.</p>
 +
</div>
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
Line 241: Line 242:
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
+
<div class="column half_size">
<p>
+
<p><u>P-atp2</u></p>
<u>P-atp2</u>
+
<p>The P-atp2 promoter, native to the bacterium <i>Corynebacterium glutamicum</i> is reportedly induced at pH 7, to pH 9 (<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Parts">BIT-China-2015</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1675021">BBa_K1675021</a>). Utilizing the blue chromoprotein (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K592009">BBa_K592009</a>), a test was designed in which a plasmid containing the P-atp2 promoter with the blue chromoprotein was grown alongside an <i>E. coli</i> line that contained a plasmid with just the blue chromoprotein. We expected to see constant blue chromoprotein production in the control series (those that lacked P-atp2) and a visual increase in blue chromoprotein as the pH was raised from 6 to 9 in the cells that contained the P-atp2 construct.</p>
<p>
+
The P-atp2 promoter, native to the bacterium <i>Corynebacterium glutamicum</i> is reportedly induced at pH 7, to pH 9 (<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Parts">BIT-China-2015</a> and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1675021">BBa_K1675021</a>). Utilizing the blue chromoprotein (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K592009">BBa_K592009</a>), a test was designed in which a plasmid containing the P-atp2 promoter with the blue chromoprotein was grown alongside an <i>E. coli</i> line that contained a plasmid with just the blue chromoprotein. We expected to see constant blue chromoprotein production in the control series (those that lacked P-atp2) and a visual increase in blue chromoprotein as the pH was raised from 6 to 9 in the cells that contained the P-atp2 construct.
+
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Patp2Results.png|thumb|left|600px| Figure 3. Insert caption here.]]
+
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Patp2Results.png|thumb|right|600px| Figure 3. Insert caption here.]]
  
 
<html>
 
<html>

Revision as of 07:04, 18 October 2016

Austin_UTexas

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!




Kombucha Strains

Conjugation

Recapitulation

Ethanol

pH Sensors