Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
This question is essential because the distance between the dCas9 may cause major problem: if this system doesn’t work we may not see the effect of the other system. In fact, the 3D structure of our linker may interact with the dCas9 or the GFP because of steric hindrance. | This question is essential because the distance between the dCas9 may cause major problem: if this system doesn’t work we may not see the effect of the other system. In fact, the 3D structure of our linker may interact with the dCas9 or the GFP because of steric hindrance. | ||
+ | |||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
We decide to build 3 different models: one with a small end to end distance, one with a long distance and one last with the mean between this two values. | We decide to build 3 different models: one with a small end to end distance, one with a long distance and one last with the mean between this two values. | ||
We had a first answer: the optimal distance lays between 73 and 110 base pairs. | We had a first answer: the optimal distance lays between 73 and 110 base pairs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =Ideal Chain an Worm-Like Chain Models= | ||
+ | We decide to simulate the end to end distance of our linker with mathematical model. The first was the Ideal Chain model (or freely jointed chain) which is the simplest model to describe polymers by assumes a polymer as a random walk. | ||
+ | For N segments with a length of l we have the contour length which is the total unfolded length: | ||
+ | |||
+ | R is the total end to end vector and it depends on the number of segments and the length of each segments: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The end to end distance is distributed according to this probability density function: | ||
+ | |||
+ | With this model, we lose the information of the spatial arrangement of the repeat units. | ||
+ | If we consider our real chain, the rotation of bonds around the backbone is restricted due to hindered internal rotation and due to excluded-volume effects. | ||
+ | With this consideration, we know that our results are biased. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We decide to continue our mathematical model and we considered the Worm-Like Chain model. | ||
+ | This model is suited for describing semi-flexible polymers. We used the paper '''Huan-Xiang Zhou (2004): Polymer Models of Protein Stability, Folding, and Interactions''' to have the probability density function: | ||
+ | |||
+ | With these two models we were able to construct a python program to have the first approximation for the end to end distance of our linker. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We see on this graph that we have two different behaviors and we can’t really develop our models because the information were really short: we just know the end to end distance. | ||
+ | So we decide to code our own model for describing the behavior of our linker. The free jointed model and the worm like chain model give us an idea for the results that we waited. | ||
+ | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 8 September 2016