(→Tripartite Split-GFP and FRB-FKBP12 dimerization systems) |
(→Assessment of the minimal distance to have fluorescence) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
This question was also the core of our [[Team:Paris_Saclay/Model#modelisation|model]], which answers the question: ''What is the optimal distance between the two dCas9s to observe fluorescence?'' | This question was also the core of our [[Team:Paris_Saclay/Model#modelisation|model]], which answers the question: ''What is the optimal distance between the two dCas9s to observe fluorescence?'' | ||
− | This question is essential because the distance between the | + | This question is essential because the distance between the dCas9s may cause major problems. First, the steric hindrance and the dCas9 footprint may avoid the GFP assembling if we target sequences that are too close. Secondly, the protein sizes we chose avoid GFP assembling if they are too far away. As a result, fluorescence emission would be detected only if the proteins, as well as the DNA regions, are distant between a precise range of distances. |
To assess experimentally such distance, we decided to design different plasmids containing the visualization target sequences separated from each other by different number of base pairs. To do so, we designed specific primers to carry out reverse PCR and obtain, from a plasmid in which the target sequences are distant by 1kB, different plasmids where the numer of base pairs between the target sequences is reduced. | To assess experimentally such distance, we decided to design different plasmids containing the visualization target sequences separated from each other by different number of base pairs. To do so, we designed specific primers to carry out reverse PCR and obtain, from a plasmid in which the target sequences are distant by 1kB, different plasmids where the numer of base pairs between the target sequences is reduced. |
Revision as of 21:20, 16 October 2016