Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 220: Line 220:
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<p>Possessing the ability to monitor the brewing process of kombucha without disturbing the microenvironment and using a very visible color reporter would allow for greater insights as to how the populations of organisms and pH may change due to competition amongst other bacteria and yeast in the beverage and SCOBY of the kombucha. The byproducts produced by the kombucha as it brews causes the tea to become more acidic, leading to our team searching for pH sensitive promoters, and for ways to implement these into kombucha.</p>
 
<p>Possessing the ability to monitor the brewing process of kombucha without disturbing the microenvironment and using a very visible color reporter would allow for greater insights as to how the populations of organisms and pH may change due to competition amongst other bacteria and yeast in the beverage and SCOBY of the kombucha. The byproducts produced by the kombucha as it brews causes the tea to become more acidic, leading to our team searching for pH sensitive promoters, and for ways to implement these into kombucha.</p>
</div>
 
  
<p>Though an acidic sensor was what was required for our kombucha analysis, the identification of sensors in other areas of the pH spectrum were explored as well. Three sequences were identified, the CadC operon for the acidic range, CpxA-CpxR complex for the neutral range, and the P-atp2 promoter from the BioBrick Registry (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1675021">BBa_K1675021</a>) for the basic range. Each sequence was paired with a unique corresponding reporter sequence so that if each pH sensitive plasmid were in the same environment, the specific pH of the system could be seen. The reporters used were, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E1010">BBa_E1010</a> for the CadC construct, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1033916">BBa_K1033916</a> for the CpxA-CpxR complex, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K592009">BBa_K592009</a> for the P-atp2 promoter.</p>
 
  
 +
<p>Though an acidic sensor was what was required for our kombucha analysis, the identification of sensors in other areas of the pH spectrum were explored as well. Three sequences were identified, the CadC operon for the acidic range, CpxA-CpxR complex for the neutral range, and the P-atp2 promoter from the BioBrick Registry (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1675021">BBa_K1675021</a>) for the basic range. Each sequence was paired with a unique corresponding reporter sequence so that if each pH sensitive plasmid were in the same environment, the specific pH of the system could be seen. The reporters used were, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E1010">BBa_E1010</a> for the CadC construct, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1033916">BBa_K1033916</a> for the CpxA-CpxR complex, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K592009">BBa_K592009</a> for the P-atp2 promoter.</p>
 +
</div>
 
<p><u>CadC</u></p>
 
<p><u>CadC</u></p>
  

Revision as of 06:58, 18 October 2016

Austin_UTexas

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!




Kombucha Strains

Conjugation

Recapitulation

Ethanol

pH Sensors

Figure 1. Testing the CpxR Construct in pH 6-9. From left to right is Control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on".

The order from left to right is control pH 6-9 and then Experimental pH 6-9. These are showing the gradient change in expression accordingly with the change of pH due to a pH-dependent promotor compared to consistent expression accordingly with a promoter that is always "on". The main point is that the Control at pH 6 has more expression of the yellow-green chromoprotein than the Experimental at pH 6. The pH-Dependent promoter of the Experimental group is down-regulated at pH 6 whereas the control is not. Also, there is an increase in YGCP expression between the Experiment pH 7 and pH 8 that is not seen in the Control between pH 7 and pH 8. The normalized data is below shows the relative expression of YGCP. The construct can be found on the iGEM registry as: BBa_K2097000.

Figure 2. Normalized fluorescent values from CpxR construct vs control (YGCP). The fluorescence per cell count stayed generally the same throughout the range of pH while the CpxR has a clear increase in fluorescence per cell.

P-atp2

The P-atp2 promoter, native to the bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum is reportedly induced at pH 7, to pH 9 (BIT-China-2015 and BBa_K1675021). Utilizing the blue chromoprotein (BBa_K592009), a test was designed in which a plasmid containing the P-atp2 promoter with the blue chromoprotein was grown alongside an E. coli line that contained a plasmid with just the blue chromoprotein. We expected to see constant blue chromoprotein production in the control series (those that lacked P-atp2) and a visual increase in blue chromoprotein as the pH was raised from 6 to 9 in the cells that contained the P-atp2 construct.

Figure 3. Insert caption here.

Next Steps and the GOX Sequences as Putative Promoters

Refrences

  1. CL, Dell., MN, Neely., and ER, Olson. (1994) Altered pH and lysine signalling mutants of cadC, a gene encoding a membrane-bound transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli cadBA operon. Molecular Microbiology 14, 7–16.
  2. Hanke, T., Richhardt, J., Polen, T., Sahm, H., Bringer, S., and Bott, M. (2012) Influence of oxygen limitation, absence of the cytochrome bc1 complex and low pH on global gene expression in Gluconobacter oxydans 621H using DNA microarray technology. Journal of Biotechnology 157, 359–372.