Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 142: Line 142:
 
The first steps in the characterization of microbes native to kombucha involved the isolation of strains from store-bought kombucha samples. This was accomplished by plating various dilutions of kombucha onto a variety of media including YPD, HS, and R2A.  
 
The first steps in the characterization of microbes native to kombucha involved the isolation of strains from store-bought kombucha samples. This was accomplished by plating various dilutions of kombucha onto a variety of media including YPD, HS, and R2A.  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Austin_UTexas--IsolatingStrains.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:80%;">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Austin_UTexas--IsolatingStrains.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:100%;">
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 1:</b>Shows YPD plates spread with various dilutions of GT's brand kombucha samples.  
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 1:</b>Shows YPD plates spread with various dilutions of GT's brand kombucha samples.  
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
Line 150: Line 150:
 
</p>   
 
</p>   
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/44/T--Austin_UTexas--ExampleGel2.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:80%;">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/44/T--Austin_UTexas--ExampleGel2.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:100%;">
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 2:</b>Example of a gel obtained after running PCR products. Lane #1 is a 100 bp ladder; Lanes 2-7 are six different kombucha isolates that underwent PCR reactions selecting for bacteria (targeting 16S rRNA gene); Lanes 8-13 are the same six isolates, in the same order, but which underwent reactions selecting for fungi (targeting ITS rRNA gene). Based on the gel results it can be observed that for any given isolate, a product in gel was only observed for either bacterial or fungal primer reactions.   
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 2:</b>Example of a gel obtained after running PCR products. Lane #1 is a 100 bp ladder; Lanes 2-7 are six different kombucha isolates that underwent PCR reactions selecting for bacteria (targeting 16S rRNA gene); Lanes 8-13 are the same six isolates, in the same order, but which underwent reactions selecting for fungi (targeting ITS rRNA gene). Based on the gel results it can be observed that for any given isolate, a product in gel was only observed for either bacterial or fungal primer reactions.   
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
Line 158: Line 158:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</html>  
 
</html>  
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%;"
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;"
 
|+Table 1:Microbes Isolated and Identified from Various Store Bought Kombucha Samples
 
|+Table 1:Microbes Isolated and Identified from Various Store Bought Kombucha Samples
 
! |Species
 
! |Species
Line 210: Line 210:
 
<h2>Recapitulation</h2>
 
<h2>Recapitulation</h2>
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/38/T--Austin_UTexas--PreviousRecaps.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:80%;">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/38/T--Austin_UTexas--PreviousRecaps.png" alt="RecapitulationsDay1" style="width:100%;">
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 1:</b>Shows samples from a series of completed recapitulation trials. A negative control triplicate set contained only tea media and experienced no microbial growth after 16 days. The positive control was inoculated with 600 uL of home-brewed kombucha and possessed distinct pellicle formation after only 2 days, forming a mature pellicle by Day 16. Both experimental trials pictured yielded successful recapitulations. Row 3 shows a set of trials that incorporated only microbes that had been purchased rather than isolated from kombucha itself. Row 4 shows successful recapitulations that contained two different strains of <i>Lachancea fermentati</i> each isolated from kombucha samples, as well as a strain of <i>Gluconobacter oxydans</i> and <i>Gluconacetobacter hansenii</i>. The cellulose pellicle produced in this set of trials is notably darker than the one observed for the purchased microbe strains as well as the positive controls.     
 
<figcaption><b>Figure 1:</b>Shows samples from a series of completed recapitulation trials. A negative control triplicate set contained only tea media and experienced no microbial growth after 16 days. The positive control was inoculated with 600 uL of home-brewed kombucha and possessed distinct pellicle formation after only 2 days, forming a mature pellicle by Day 16. Both experimental trials pictured yielded successful recapitulations. Row 3 shows a set of trials that incorporated only microbes that had been purchased rather than isolated from kombucha itself. Row 4 shows successful recapitulations that contained two different strains of <i>Lachancea fermentati</i> each isolated from kombucha samples, as well as a strain of <i>Gluconobacter oxydans</i> and <i>Gluconacetobacter hansenii</i>. The cellulose pellicle produced in this set of trials is notably darker than the one observed for the purchased microbe strains as well as the positive controls.     
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Austin_UTexas--OngoingRecapitulations.png" alt="Conjugation2" style="width:80%;">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d6/T--Austin_UTexas--OngoingRecapitulations.png" alt="Conjugation2" style="width:100%;">
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 257: Line 257:
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%;"
+
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;"
 
|+Table 1:The Three Endogenous GOX Sequences
 
|+Table 1:The Three Endogenous GOX Sequences
 
! |Locus Tag
 
! |Locus Tag

Revision as of 17:24, 18 October 2016

Austin_UTexas

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!




Kombucha Strains

Conjugation

Recapitulation

Ethanol

pH Sensors