Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Results"

Line 157: Line 157:
 
<h2>Conjugation</h2>
 
<h2>Conjugation</h2>
  
<p>We have attempted to conjugate GFP into both <i>G. oxydans</i> and <i>G. hansenii</i> with a Diaminopimelic Acid (DAP) auxotrophic strain of <i> E. coli </i>. The plasmid contains the vector pMMB67EH, the promoter PA-1, GFP and a spectinomycin resistance gene. </p>
+
<p>We have attempted to conjugate GFP into both <i>G. oxydans</i> and <i>G. hansenii</i> with a Diaminopimelic Acid (DAP) auxotrophic strain of <i> E. coli</i>. The plasmid contains the vector pMMB67EH, the promoter PA-1, GFP and a spectinomycin resistance gene. </p>
  
 
<p>The first conjugation was done with KOM strains 4 (<i>G. oxydans</i>) 5 (<i> G. oxydans </i> and 15 (<i> L. fermentati </i>). We attempted these conjugations before sequencing the recipient strains, so that is why we tried to conjugate into <i> L. fermentati </i>. First, a mixture between a KOM strain and the DAP auxotroph strain were plated on a LB+DAP solid medium to allow for conjugation to occur. After 24 hours of incubation, we scraped up the growth and plated each conjugation mixture onto a LB+Spec plate. Next, we viewed the potential transconjugants on a fluorescence microscope. We then picked these glowing colonies and then after streaking them out onto more LB+Spec plates, we attempted to use 16s sequencing to confirm successful conjugation. After troubleshooting our 16s procedure, we were finally able to obtain a viable sequencing result. However, all of the glowing colonies were identified as <i>E. coli</i>.</p>
 
<p>The first conjugation was done with KOM strains 4 (<i>G. oxydans</i>) 5 (<i> G. oxydans </i> and 15 (<i> L. fermentati </i>). We attempted these conjugations before sequencing the recipient strains, so that is why we tried to conjugate into <i> L. fermentati </i>. First, a mixture between a KOM strain and the DAP auxotroph strain were plated on a LB+DAP solid medium to allow for conjugation to occur. After 24 hours of incubation, we scraped up the growth and plated each conjugation mixture onto a LB+Spec plate. Next, we viewed the potential transconjugants on a fluorescence microscope. We then picked these glowing colonies and then after streaking them out onto more LB+Spec plates, we attempted to use 16s sequencing to confirm successful conjugation. After troubleshooting our 16s procedure, we were finally able to obtain a viable sequencing result. However, all of the glowing colonies were identified as <i>E. coli</i>.</p>

Revision as of 06:08, 19 October 2016

Results


Click on one of the images below to learn more about our results!