Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h5 align="center"> It was observed in the tables that device two had the highest levels of fluorescence, followed by the positive control, then the first device. The negative control samples showed the lowest levels of fluorescence out of all of the samples collected. The data collected was then organized in a graph to better depict the possible differences in absorbances between the samples. The graph displayed the data as fluorescence in absorbency units over time the sample was incubated for in hours </h5> | <h5 align="center"> It was observed in the tables that device two had the highest levels of fluorescence, followed by the positive control, then the first device. The negative control samples showed the lowest levels of fluorescence out of all of the samples collected. The data collected was then organized in a graph to better depict the possible differences in absorbances between the samples. The graph displayed the data as fluorescence in absorbency units over time the sample was incubated for in hours </h5> | ||
− | <h3 align="center" >InterLab Fluorescence Graph</h3> | + | <h3 align="center">InterLab Fluorescence Graph</h3> |
<img align="center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8c/T--WPI_Worcester--InterLab_Fluorescence_Graph.jpg" alt="InterLab Fluorescence Graph" style="width:638px;height:452px;"> | <img align="center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/8c/T--WPI_Worcester--InterLab_Fluorescence_Graph.jpg" alt="InterLab Fluorescence Graph" style="width:638px;height:452px;"> | ||
<h5 align="center">The graph created in the figure above matched the observations made from its related graph. It also showed that each sample had defined trends of fluorescence and all but the negative control increased in fluorescence as incubation time increased.</h5=> | <h5 align="center">The graph created in the figure above matched the observations made from its related graph. It also showed that each sample had defined trends of fluorescence and all but the negative control increased in fluorescence as incubation time increased.</h5=> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h5 align="center:>Finally, the relation between the fluorescence and optical density at 590nm was calculated and recorded in the tables below. The first table showed the calculated relations and the second table showed the averages for each sample and their corresponding standard deviations </h5> | <h5 align="center:>Finally, the relation between the fluorescence and optical density at 590nm was calculated and recorded in the tables below. The first table showed the calculated relations and the second table showed the averages for each sample and their corresponding standard deviations </h5> | ||
− | <h3 align="center" >InterLab Fluorescence/Abs590 Tables</h3> | + | <h3 align="center"> InterLab Fluorescence/Abs590 Tables </h3> |
<img align="center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--WPI_Worcester--FlandAbs590_Tables.jpg" alt="InterLab Fluorescence and Absorption Relation Data" style="width:723p×;height:433px;"> | <img align="center" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--WPI_Worcester--FlandAbs590_Tables.jpg" alt="InterLab Fluorescence and Absorption Relation Data" style="width:723p×;height:433px;"> | ||
<h5 align="center"> The results of the calculations made above were then used to plot the relation between fluorescence verse optical density and show just how much the data varied for each sample and for each incubation time </h5> | <h5 align="center"> The results of the calculations made above were then used to plot the relation between fluorescence verse optical density and show just how much the data varied for each sample and for each incubation time </h5> |
Revision as of 21:58, 19 October 2016