Difference between revisions of "Team:Pasteur Paris/Research"

Line 365: Line 365:
 
     <li class="slide-container">
 
     <li class="slide-container">
 
         <div class="slide">
 
         <div class="slide">
           <p><img class="Photo paysage" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/04/Scenario_design2_pasteur.jpg" />
+
           <p><img class="Photo paysage" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/42/T--Pasteur_Paris--Scenario_design2_pasteur.jpg" />
 
       </br></br> These applications scenarios have allowed us to create the Moskit(o) project. They were validated by Synenergene, a Rathenau’s Institute program (learn more here).</br></br>  
 
       </br></br> These applications scenarios have allowed us to create the Moskit(o) project. They were validated by Synenergene, a Rathenau’s Institute program (learn more here).</br></br>  
 
Concretely, it’s about answering questions related to our project : <B>security-related</B> impacts, <B>ethics</B>, <B>regulations</B>, <B>technical requirements</B> and especially its <B>use</B>. Indeed, these scenarios have been made in parallel to the development of the science protocols, which strengthened and fed as much the science part, as the design part. We have carried out extensive studies of different contexts to identify actors of the Moskit(o) project, from the manufacturer to the user.
 
Concretely, it’s about answering questions related to our project : <B>security-related</B> impacts, <B>ethics</B>, <B>regulations</B>, <B>technical requirements</B> and especially its <B>use</B>. Indeed, these scenarios have been made in parallel to the development of the science protocols, which strengthened and fed as much the science part, as the design part. We have carried out extensive studies of different contexts to identify actors of the Moskit(o) project, from the manufacturer to the user.

Revision as of 23:31, 19 October 2016