Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Experiments"

 
Line 322: Line 322:
 
<center><img class="something" width="100px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f5/T--Freiburg--deliverymethod1.png"> </center>
 
<center><img class="something" width="100px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f5/T--Freiburg--deliverymethod1.png"> </center>
 
Where:
 
Where:
<img class="something" style="width:70px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c4/T--Freiburg--deliverymethod3.png"> = slope of the graph
+
<img class="something" style="width:70px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c4/T--Freiburg--deliverymethod3.png"> = slope of the graph<br>
εmM = extinction coefficient of CDNB at 340 nm (adjusted to the path length of the wells by taking the path length [cm] times 9.6)
+
ε<sub>mM</sub> = extinction coefficient of CDNB at 340 nm (adjusted to the path length of the wells by taking the path length [cm] times 9.6)<br>
Vges = reaction volume in the well
+
V<sub>ges</sub> = reaction volume in the well<br>
Venz = the volume of the sample tested
+
V<sub>enz</sub> = the volume of the sample tested<br>
  
 
   
 
   

Latest revision as of 03:24, 20 October 2016

Back to Top

Our Methods

Cloning

I. Culture conditions

The E. coli strains were maintained in lysogeny broth medium. Liquid cultures were incubated at 37°C and 250 g. Solid cultures were incubated on 1.5% Agar LB plates. Selection of transformed E. coli was performed by supplementation of the LB medium with the antibiotics ampicillin at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL and chloramphenicol at 25 µg/mL.

II. Preparation of chemically competent E. coli

Competent E. coli were prepared using the Zymo Research Mix & Go E. coli Transformation Kit according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The E. coli were inoculated and incubated in 50 mL of ZymoBroth™ medium until an OD600 of 0.6 was reached. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with 1x Wash Buffer. After centrifugation the supernatant was removed and the cells were resuspended in pre-cooled 1x Competent Buffer. The competent E. coli were aliquoted into sterile tubes and stored at -80°C until further use. Using the chemically competent E. coli prepared by the Mix & Go Transformation Kit no heat shock or electroporation was necessary.

III. Transformation of chemically competent E. coli

The competent E. coli were transformed by addition of 2 – 5 µL of a reaction mix containing the appropriate plasmids. E. coli transformed with plasmids harboring an ampicillin resistance were directly spread on agar plates supplemented with ampicilin. For antibiotic resistances the transformed cells were incubated in 300 µL of LB medium at 37°C and 250 rpm prior to spreading on a LB agar plate. The spread cells were incubated over night at 37°C. Subsequently, 5 colonies per plate were picked by a pipet tip, inoculated in 5 mL of LB medium supplemented the appropriate antibiotics and incubated over night at 37°C and 250 rpm.

IV. Bacterial glycerol stocks

For storage of bacterial strains 500 µL of the overnight inoculation were added to 500 µL of 30% glycerol and gently mixed. The stocks were stored at – 80°C for later use.

V. Plasmid preparation

The preparation of plasmids from transformed E. coli was performed using the kits from Qiagen, PeqLab or Zymo Research according to the protocols of the manufacturers. Prior to the preparation the transformed E. coli were incubated in 5 mL of LB medium supplemented with the appropriate amount of antibiotics. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed at alkaline conditions. The lysate containing the plasmids was loaded on spin columns and eluted in 30 µL of nuclease free water. The concentration of the DNA was determined by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.

VI. Restriction digestion of plasmids

a) Digestion of plasmids for cloning

To release inserts from their backbone for further applications 2µg of plasmid DNA was treated with 10 units of the appropriate enzyme in 1X buffer at a total reaction volume of 50 µL and incubated for 1 hour at the appropriate temperature. If two restriction enzymes were used simultaneously the right conditions were determined by the “NEB Double Digest Finder” online tool. The reaction was stopped by addition of 10x orange G loading dye and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

b) Test digestion

Verification of transformed plasmids was performed by treatment of 500 ng of the prepared DNA with 5 units of appropriate restriction enzymes in its respective 1x reaction buffer and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The sizes of the observed bands were compared to the sizes of the expected fragments. Samples that exhibited the expected fragment sizes were further analyzed by sequencing

c) Linearization of plasmids for transformation of B. subtilis

The transformation of integration vectors into B. subtilis and to insert the fusion constructs into the genome 3 µg of the plasmid was linearized by a single cutter enzyme in the appropriate 1x buffer at a total reaction volume of 50 µL. The reaction was stopped by addition of 10x orange G loading dye, analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently extracted and purified from the gel.

VII. Agarose gel electrophoresis

Amplified of digested DNA samples were supplemented with the appropriate amount of 10x Orange G loading dye and loaded on a 1% (w/v) agarose TAE gel. Staining of the DNA was performed by the PeqGreen DNA dye at the recommended concentration. The gel was subjected to electrophoresis at 110 V for approximately 30 min or until a sufficient separation of the bands was observable. Visualization of the separated DNA fragments in the gel was performed by an ultraviolet light imager. A 2-log DNA ladder and a 1kb DNA ladder were included as molecular size marker.

VIII. Gel extraction

Extraction of amplified genes or digested fragments from agarose gels was performed using the QIAquick gel extraction kit from Qiagen according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The bands corresponding to the expected fragment sizes were excised from the gel, lysed with QG buffer at 50°C and loaded on a DNA spin column. The DNA was eluted with 30 µL of nuclease free water and stored at –20°C until further use.

IX. Gibson assembly

In order to generate the fusion constructs the coat genes, the anti-GFP nanobody and the glutathione S-transferase were amplified by extension PCR to introduce overlapping sequences of at least 25 bp required for Gibson assembly. The iGEM standard backbone pBS1C3 was linearized by treatment with XbaI and SpeI. The assembly was performed with the linearized backbone, an amplified coat gene, and the anti-GFP nanobody or the glutathione S-transferase at molar ratios of 3:1 (insert : vector). The volume of the fragments was adjusted to 2.5 µL with nuclease free water and added to 7.5 µL of prepared 1.33X Gibson master mix. The reaction was incubated for 60 min at 50°C and 2 µL were used to transform chemically competent E. coli DH5α.

X. Polymerase chain reactions

a) Colony PCR

For the amplification of the genes from B.subtilis a single colony was dissolved in water and lysed by heat shock at 100°C for 10 min. 1 µL of the lysate was used as template for the amplification. The PCR was performed using the Q5 High-Fidelity 2x Master Mix from NEB, alongside with the appropriate forward and reverse primer at a final concentration of 0.5 µM at a total volume of 50 µL. The reaction was subjected to thermal cycling, subsequently stopped by addition of 10x Orange G loading dye and analyzed by gel electrophoresis.

b) Extension PCR

In order to introduce additional elements to the used genes, such as linker regions or epitope tags, the PCR was performed using primers with the appropriate overhangs. Approximately, 10 ng of plasmid DNA was used for amplification in Q5 High-Fidelity 2x Master Mix from NEB, alongside with the forward and reverse primer at a final concentration of 0.5 µM in a total volume of 50 µL. The reaction was subjected to thermal cycling, subsequently stopped by addition of 10x Orange G loading dye and analyzed by gel electrophoresis.

c) Thermal cycling

The thermal cycling was performed according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Initial denaturation was carried out at 98°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycling steps including denaturation at 98°C for 15 s, primer annealing at the appropriate temperature for 15 s and elongation at 72°C for 30s/ kb of the amplicon. The cycling was followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min and the reaction was stored at 8°C. The annealing temperatures for the used primers was determined by the NEB TM calculator online tool. The thermal cycling was performed as touchdown-PCR. The initial annealing temperature was increased by 10°C and after each cycle step reduced by 1°C until the final annealing temperature was reached. backbone

XI. T4-Ligation and subcloning

Ligation of amplified B. subtilis coat genes or digested DNA fragments with fusion constructs was performed using the T4 ligase from NEB. The insert, alongside with 50 ng of the linearized backbone were ligated at a molar ratio of 3 : 1 (vector : insert) using 5 units of T4 ligase in 1x T4 reaction buffer in a total reaction volume of 20 µL. The reaction was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes and 5 µL of the reaction mixture were transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α.

XII. Annealed oligo cloning

For the insertion of small elements into a vector, two oligos containing the desired sequence were mixed at a molar ratio of 1 : 1 and incubated for 15 minutes at 100°C, subsequently the temperature was gradually decreased to room temperature over the course of 3 hours. The annealed oligos were ligated into a plasmid with the appropriate overhangs using the T4 ligase from NEB.

XIII. Sequencing

Plasmids that were verified by restriction digestion were sent to sequencing by GATC biotech. The concentration of the DNA samples was adjusted to 30 – 50 ng/µL at a total volume 20 µL. The appropriate primer required for the sequencing reaction were sent in an additional microtube at a concentration of 10 µM. The sequencing results were analyzed using the Geneious software.

Bacillus subtilis

I. Cultivation and germination of Spores

The Bacillus subtilis strains were maintained on 1.5% LB agar. Liquid cultures were grown in LB medium at 37°C and 200 rpm. To germinate Bacillus subtilis spores, the samples were also inoculated in LB medium and incubated overnight.

II. Sporulation

The cultures were inoculated in LB medium at 37°C and 200 rpm until they reach their exponential growth phase and then resuspended in Difco Sporulation Medium (DSM). After 24 hours of incubation, the cells are sporulated. To purify the samples, they were treated with lysozyme.
Protocol

III. Competent cells + Transformation

To make Bacillus subtilis competent, the samples were inoculated in minimal medium and grow until they reached an OD600 of 1.0-1.3/ml. 600 ng of DNA was added to 400 µl of the competent cells, incubated time temperature shaking and streaked on selective agar.
Protocol

IV. Selection

To find out if the positive colonies have the DNA inserted in the right locus after transformation the colonies are picked. For the locus amyE the colonies are plated on starch plates and incubated. By adding lugol’s iodite it is possible to differ the colonies. The wt and control is able to reduce the starch and should decolorize the area around it , whilst the transformed colonies should stay purple.

V. The concentration of antibiotics used for Bacillus subtilis

The table shows the minimal concentrations of different antibiotics used for the selection of antibiotic resistant Bacillus subtilis cells.
AntibioticStock solutionDilution Bacillus subtilis
Spectinomycin (Spec)100 mg/ML1 to 1,000
Chloramphenical (Cml)25 mg/ml1 to 5,000
Erythromycin(Erm)10 mg/ml1 to 1,000

Expression analysis

1. Preparation of spore coat lysates

Approximately 700 Mio spores of Bacillus subtilis were resuspended in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris base, 1% SDS, 8 M Urea and 50 mM DTT. The samples were incubated o/n at 60°C while shaking.1 The samples were centrifuged and the SN was taken for further analysis.

2. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

40 µl of the spore coat lysates were incubated with 6X Loading dye and boiled for 10 minutes. The prepared spore coat lysates were loaded onto a 10% polyacrylamide gel for SDS-PAGE. The gel was run according to the manufacturer (Bio-Rad). The gel was either stained with Bio-SafeTM Coomassie Stain from Bio-Rad or transferred onto a PVDF membrane for Western Blot analysis. As all constructs contain a HA tag, Anti-HA.11 Epitope Tag Antibody from Biolegend® were used. HRP Goat anti-mouse IgG (minimal x-reactivity) Antibodies from Biolegend® were used for detection. For imaging the Fusion Fx (Vilber Lourmat) was used.

3. Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry analysis was performed using 5Mio spores of Bacillus subtilis. HA-Tag (6E2) Mouse mAb (Alexa Fluor® 647 Conjugate) from Cell Signaling Technology® were used for detection of the HA tag. The spores were incubated for 40mins on ice using a dilution of 1:50 in a total volume of 50 µl.
Nanobody expressing spores were:
1. incubated with 100 µg/ml GFP in a total volume of 50µl for 40 mins on ice.
2. blocked in 5% BSA for 1h on ice, washed three times with 1x PBS and stained with 100 µg/ml GFP in a total volume of 50µl for 40 mins on ice.
3. blocked in 5% BSA for 1h on ice and subsequently stained with 100 µg/ml GFP in a total volume of 50µl for 40 mins on ice.
All samples were washed 5x with 0.05% TBS-T and resuspended in 1x PBS for FACS analysis. For imaging the GALLIOS flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter) was used. The data was analyzed using the FlowJo software.

4. Protein purification

Plasmid was transformed into Rosetta pLysS competent cells and grown in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and chloramphenicol (25 µg/ml). Cells were induced at OD600=0.8 w. 1 mM IPTG (end conc.) and incubated overnight at 25°C.

Cells were pelleted at 4000 g 20 min. Resuspended in buffer A, sonicated and purified on HisTrap column.

Questions No. 1: Sample Answer: aGFP nanobody

No. 2: Column Answer: HisTrap FF 5 ml

No. 3: Buffer A Answer: 50 mM Tris 500 mM NaCl 20 mM Imidazole 10% glycerol pH 8.0

No. 4: Buffer B Answer: 50 mM Tris 150 mM NaCl 400 mM Imidazole 10% glycerol pH 7.6 The elution buffer was exchanged to PBS using HiPrep 26/10 Desalting column. His tag was cleaved using TEV protease overnight at 4°C. Free his-tag, TEV protease and uncleaved aGFP nanobody were removed from cleaved aGFP nanobody by second pass through HisTrap FF 5 ml column.

5. Preparation of E. coli whole cell lysates

The E. coli samples were incubated in 1xPBS and sonified for 10 minutes at 20%.

6. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

The protein concentration was determined via a Lowry assay. 20 µl of the E. coli whole cell lysates with wanted protein amount were incubated with 4 µl of 6X Loading dye and boiled for 10 minutes. The prepared lysates were loaded onto a 10% polyacrylamide gel for SDS-PAGE. The gel was run according to the manufacturer (Bio-Rad). The gel was either stained with Bio-SafeTM Coomassie Stain from Bio-Rad or transferred onto a PVDF membrane for Western Blot analysis. As all constructs contain a HA tag, Anti-HA.11 Epitope Tag Antibody from Biolegend® were used. HRP Goat anti-mouse IgG (minimal x-reactivity) Antibodies from Biolegend® were used for detection. For imaging the Fusion Fx (Vilber Lourmat) was used.


References
1. Riesenman, P. J. & Nicholson, W. L. Role of the Spore Coat Layers in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Hydrogen Peroxide, Artificial UV-C, UV-B, and Solar UV Radiation // Role of the spore coat layers in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to hydrogen peroxide, artificial UV-C, UV-B, and solar UV radiation. Applied and environmental microbiology 66, 620–626 (2000).

Targeting

1. (3-Glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane (GOPTS) - Coating of microscope slides

Glass slides were washed with EtOH (70%) and ddH2O and activated by oxygen plasma (300 s, 50% Power, Plasma Cleaner ZEPTO, Electronic Diener). The activated surface was incubated with GOPTS (50 µl, 2 h, darkness). The slides were then washed with acetone (99,9%) to remove excess GOPTS.

2. Spotting

A spotting mask (silicone, CultureWell™) was used to evenly create sample spots on slides. The spots were incubated with protein solution (GFP/anti-GFP nanobody) (2µl, 15 min, 4°C, darkness) of different concentrations. Blocking was done with a BSA (4%)- or milk protein (5%)-solution.

3. Spore binding assay

A solution of spores (of different concentrations) was pipetted on a nanobody spot and incubated for 20 min. Excess spore were washed off using PBS(1x) (Phosphate Buffered Saline) (10 min, 10 rpm).

4. Sample preparation

After washing the slides were dried with compressed air. A Mowiol/DABCO (2.5%) mounting solution was used to avoid withering of the proteins (amount depending on size of the cover slip). The samples have been incubated overnight. The coverslips were sealed with nail polish.

5. Fluorescence microscopy

Sample analysis was done by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon C2+ confocal).

V) Enzymatic activity

1. Preparation of reagents

Purified glutathione S-transferase (25 U/mg) was aliquoted at a concentration 0.2 mg/ml in PBS buffer supplemented with EDTA (100 mM) and stored at -20°C. The enzyme substrates CDNB and reduced L‑glutathione (GSH) were both aliquoted at a concentration of 100 mM in ethanol and stored at -20°C.

2. GST assay

In order to determine the GST activity in a sample, the reaction was freshly set up with 75µl CDNB and 75µl GSH in 1X PBS for a volume of 1500µl, sufficient for about 16 wells (à 90µl). This equals 0,05% of each substrate in the master mix. The purified glutathione S-transferase was used as positive reaction control. As negative controls empty wells with PBS instead of enzyme solution were used. The reaction was monitored for a time-course of 2 hours with orbital averaging by means of absorbance at 340 nm in the plate reader (CLARIOstar, BMG Labtech). Before each measurement the plate was shook at 300 rpm for 1 s. To calculate the activity of GST a formula based on the Beer-Lambert law was used:
Where: = slope of the graph
εmM = extinction coefficient of CDNB at 340 nm (adjusted to the path length of the wells by taking the path length [cm] times 9.6)
Vges = reaction volume in the well
Venz = the volume of the sample tested

Shampoo:

1. Coating of microplates with GFP

Bicarbonate/carbonate coating buffer (100 mM) was prepared by dissolving 3.03 g Na2CO3, 6.0 g NaHCO3 in 1000 ml of distilled water. The pH value was adjusted to 9.6. Purified GFP was diluted in prepared coating buffer at a concentration of 20 µg/ml and 100 µl were added to each well. The plate was incubated for 2 h at RT and subsequently washed twice with 200 µl of PBS. The remaining protein-binding sites were blocked with 200 µl blocking buffer containing 5%(w/v) non-fat dry milk in PBS. After the incubation the blocking solution was removed and the wells were washed twice with 200 µl of PBS. The coating of the plates with GFP was verified by determination of the fluorescence emission at 496 nm with 50 flashes per well, at a focal height of 3.6 nm and a gain value of 1740.

2. Washing with probiotic shampoo

The GFP-coated plates were were washed with detergent solutions containing SDS or a commercially available shampoo (Syoss OLEO21) and with detergent solutions containing purified anti-GFP nanobody (4.8 ng per well) or anti-GFP nanobody displaying spores (20 million spores per well). After an incubation time of 5 minutes with the detergent solutions the plates were washed twice with 200 µl of PBS. The remaining GFP fluorescence was determined at an emission wavelength of 496 nm with 50 flashes per well, focal height of 3.6 nm and a gain value of 1740. To calculate the washing efficiency of the detergent solutions the ratio of GFP fluorescence before and after the washing procedure was determined.

Posted by: iGEM Freiburg

Nanocillus - 'cause spore is more!