Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Human Practices"

(Prototype team page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Freiburg}}
+
{{Freiburg/Main}}
 +
{{Freiburg/Menubar}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
<div class="column full_size">
 
  
<p>iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
+
<div class="column full_size" >
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
+
<h5> Human Practices </h5>
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>.</p>
+
<p>This year, Freiburg’s iGEM team intends to spread the awareness of Synthetic biology in the public. It doesn’t only mean to speak to students and academic people about our project, but also include talking to people of professions other than scientific research. We started with a collaboration with the university’s radio program to share our visions and ideas with students through a radio interview. We talk about iGEM, synthetic biology and the basics of our project. Our motivation is to get the synthetic biology and the iGEM competition closer to public. We believe that the state of the art of scientific research is a rapid development that also concerns students from other majors. For example, do the history students of your university know anything about promotors, the bacteria used in drug development or even in their dairy products? ;)
</div>
+
Next, we want to find out what the people out there think about our application. While working in the lab is essential for success and progress in your project, you might forget to think about what your product will look like in real life conditions, what actually the use for consumers and patients is! If you develop an assay, will it be practical enough to be used in an efficient way? If you improve a drug, will it be too expensive for the public? Would anyone trust a medical product with bacterial spores? Are there any drawbacks you don’t think of? Find it out – ask people who are not professional scientists and those opinions and suggestions will make our project fit better to public expectations.
 +
Since our project has a highly medical relevance, we are also interested in the professional medical input doctors and scientic clinicans give us. Therefore, we conducted interviews with dermatologists and gastroenterologist who helped us to get new input.  
 +
</p>
  
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<div class="highlight">
 
<h5>Note</h5>
 
<p>You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Awards">awards</a> for Human Practices:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Human Practices silver medal criterion</li>
 
<li>Human Practices gold medal criterion</li>
 
<li>Best Integrated Human Practices award</li>
 
<li>Best Education and Public Engagement award</li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Philosophy</li>
 
<li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
 
<li>Education</li>
 
<li>Product Design</li>
 
<li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
 
<li>Environmental Impact</li>
 
<li>Ethics</li>
 
<li>Safety</li>
 
<li>Security</li>
 
<li>Public Policy</li>
 
<li>Law and Regulation</li>
 
<li>Risk Assessment</li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
 
<p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).</p>
 
</div>
 
 
 
<div class="column half_size">
 
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
<p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
</html>
 

Revision as of 17:15, 21 August 2016

Human Practices

This year, Freiburg’s iGEM team intends to spread the awareness of Synthetic biology in the public. It doesn’t only mean to speak to students and academic people about our project, but also include talking to people of professions other than scientific research. We started with a collaboration with the university’s radio program to share our visions and ideas with students through a radio interview. We talk about iGEM, synthetic biology and the basics of our project. Our motivation is to get the synthetic biology and the iGEM competition closer to public. We believe that the state of the art of scientific research is a rapid development that also concerns students from other majors. For example, do the history students of your university know anything about promotors, the bacteria used in drug development or even in their dairy products? ;) Next, we want to find out what the people out there think about our application. While working in the lab is essential for success and progress in your project, you might forget to think about what your product will look like in real life conditions, what actually the use for consumers and patients is! If you develop an assay, will it be practical enough to be used in an efficient way? If you improve a drug, will it be too expensive for the public? Would anyone trust a medical product with bacterial spores? Are there any drawbacks you don’t think of? Find it out – ask people who are not professional scientists and those opinions and suggestions will make our project fit better to public expectations. Since our project has a highly medical relevance, we are also interested in the professional medical input doctors and scientic clinicans give us. Therefore, we conducted interviews with dermatologists and gastroenterologist who helped us to get new input.