Kombucha Strains

One of the earliest goals of our project was to identify a specific set of microbes responsible for the production of kombucha. To do this, samples of store-bought kombucha were plated onto a variety of media with various dilutions to isolate microbes. Then, morphologically different colonies were cultured and saved as a frozen glycerol stock for further use. Once we obtained a collection of microbial isolates, each microbe was sequenced and identified by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify a particular ribosomal RNA gene. The 16S gene was selected for bacterial strains, and the ITS gene was amplified for the fungal samples.¹ After the samples were sequenced, we utilized the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) SeqMatch Tool to identify our isolated species of bacteria and yeast. By identifying these kombucha strains, we were able to use our own experimentally-isolated strains for our future kombucha experiments.

References

1. Marsh, A. J., O'Sullivan, O., Hill, C., Ross, R. P., and Cotter, P. D. (2014) Sequence-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal compositions of multiple kombucha (tea fungus) samples. Food Microbiology.

Conjugation

In order to demonstrate that we can genetically engineer the bacterial strains that we identified, Gluconobacter oxydans and Gluconacetobacter xylinus, we attempted to conjugate various plasmids encoding fluorescent devices, such as GFP and Crimson, into these bacteria using a DAP (Diaminopimelic Acid) auxotroph strain of E. coli [REFERENCES]. To assist in this process, we also conducted minimal inhibitory concentration studies with each of these bacteria using [THESE ANTIBIOTICS]. Ultimately, [BLAH BLAH BLAH]. The plasmid, pBTK520, contains GFP and a spectinomycin resistance gene. Once the bacteria are successfully conjugated we can.... [BLAH BLAH BLAH].

Recapitulation

One of the primary focuses of our project is to study the nature of the symbiotic community of fermenting kombucha. Recapitulation refers to the reformation of kombucha from individual isolates of microbes taken from the beverage. Through this process we determined that the microbial community could be recreated from its constituent bacteria and yeast. We also identified the microbes that appear to be essential for the brewing of kombucha, at least to a first approximation as we could not imbibe our experimental results. These results [BLAH BLAH BLAH]...

Ethanol

During the fermentation process, yeast in kombucha produce ethanol, the type of alcohol present in beer, wine, and other alcoholic beverages. This presents a challenge to kombucha brewers who wish to market their product as a non-alcoholic beverage. If the alcohol content of a manufacturer’s kombucha exceeds 0.5% at any point during production, the manufacturer may not market their beverage as non-alcoholic and must be regulated as a producer of alcoholic beverages.¹ One way to tackle this problem with synthetic biology is to ferment with yeast that produce less ethanol. However, this may be impractical. Some bacteria in the SCOBY oxidize ethanol produced by the yeast to produce acetic acid, which is a major component of the beverage’s distinctive, tart flavor.

Another approach is to increase the rate at which the bacteria convert the ethanol to acetic acid. Two enzymes are responsible for this process: an alcohol dehydrogenase and an aldehyde dehydrogenase.² Using Golden Gate assembly, we plan to assemble a construct containing the coding sequences for these genes and insert the construct into Gluconacetobacter hansenii, an acetic acid-producing bacterium similar to those found in kombucha. Then, we plan to recapitulate kombucha with both the transformed and control Ga. hansenii to evaluate the ethanol content over the course of the fermentation with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We also plan to determine whether increasing the acetic acid production will lead to a pH change that could affect the flavor of the beverage by testing the pH and observing the cultures for visible differences. If we are able to create a microbial community that results in a lower ethanol content within the kombucha during fermentation, kombucha brewers could use the modified bacterium to help ensure the ethanol content of their product stays below the legal limit.

References

1. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. Kombucha Information and Resources. 2016. https://www.ttb.gov/kombucha/kombucha-general.shtml
2. Mamlouk, D., and Gullo, M. (2013) Acetic Acid Bacteria: Physiology and Carbon Sources Oxidation. Indian Journal of Microbiology 53, 377–384.

Brazzein

One of the potential methods to create designer kombucha is to add a brazzein gene into the bacterial strains. Brazzein, a protein found in the pulp of the edible fruit of the African plant Pentadiplandra brazzeana Baill, is an extremely sweet substance¹. It is 2,000 times sweeter than sucrose by weight. This makes it a healthy and economical alternative to sugar. Commercial production of brazzein is limited, however, because it comes from a tropical plant. If it could be more easily harvested, it could be used to improve the flavor of various foods and drinks, including kombucha. By genetically engineering the brazzein gene into the bacteria in kombucha, the drink could be sweetened without adding sugar or excessive calories. While still being a GMO product, this beverage would be low in sugar and could appeal to a health-conscious consumer.

References

1. 1.Yan, Sen et al. “Expression of Plant Sweet Protein Brazzein in the Milk of Transgenic Mice.” Ed. Xiao-Jiang Li. PLoS ONE 8.10 (2013): e76769.

pH Sensors

Many of the microorganisms involved in the fermentation of kombucha produce acidic metabolites that lower the pH of the culture. Using pH-sensitive promoters to control the expression of reporter proteins, such as GFP or a chromoprotein, would allow visualization of the pH change. The promoters Cpx, P-atp2, and Cadc were selected as pH sensors to indicate pH in the neutral, basic, and acidic ranges, respectively.^1,3,5,6 These constructs have been or will be transformed into Escherichia coli to confirm pH sensitivity prior to introduction to kombucha and to see if these constructs could be utilized as sensors in mediums besides kombucha.

Modification of Gluconobacter oxydans, a bacterium in kombucha, is also planned to avoid disturbing the kombucha microbiome. Three endogenous upstream regions of loci that were reported to show increased mRNA synthesis as pH decreased were obtained.² Golden Gate assembly is currently being used to quickly assemble these promoters upstream of Venus (pYTK033).⁴ Once successful, these pH-sensitive promoters with different reporters will be used to visualize the different members of the kombucha microbiome overtime.

References

1. BIT-China-2015
2. Hanke, T., Richhardt, J., Polen, T., Sahm, H., Bringer, S., and Bott, M. (2012) Influence of oxygen limitation, absence of the cytochrome bc1 complex and low pH on global gene expression in Gluconobacter oxydans 621H using DNA microarray technology. Journal of Biotechnology 157, 359–372.
3. Kuper, C., and Jung, K. (2005) CadC-mediated activation of the cadBA promoter in Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular and Microbiological Biotechnology 1, 26–39.
4. Lee ME, DeLoache, WC A, Cervantes B, Dueber, JE. (2015) A Highly-characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multi-part Assembly. ACS Synthetic Biology 4 975-986
5. Nakayama, S.-I., and Watanabe, H. (1998) Identification of cpxR as a Positive Regulator Essential for Expression of the Shigella sonnei virF Gene. Journal of Bacteriology 180, 3522–3528.
6. Nakayama, S.-I., and Watanabe, H. (1995) Involvement of cpxA, a Sensor of a Two-Component Regulatory System, in the pH-Dependent Regulation of Expression of Shigella sonnei virF Gene. Journal of Bacteriology 177, 5062–5069.