Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Achievements"
YKristiansen (Talk | contribs) |
YKristiansen (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="abstract2"> | <div class="abstract2"> | ||
| − | <center><p><h5>Special Tracks</h5><br/></p></center> | + | <center><p><h5>Applied Special Tracks</h5><br/></p></center> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<table id="archie"> | <table id="archie"> | ||
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Design | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Applied Design</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Basic Part</td></tr> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best New Basic Part</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best New Composite Part </td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Part Collection</td></tr> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Part Collection</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Hardware </td></tr> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Hardware</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Software</td></tr> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Software Tool</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Measurement</td></tr> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Innovation in Measurement</td></tr> |
| − | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td> | + | <tr><td id="check"><b><font color=blue>✓</font></b></td><td>Best Model</td></tr> |
</table> | </table> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 13:35, 15 October 2016
ACHIEVEMENTS
BRONZE
| ✓ | Register for iGEM, have a great summer, and attend the Giant Jamboree |
| ✓ | Meet all deliverables on the Requirements page |
| ✓ | Create a page on your team wiki with clear attribution of each aspect of your project |
| ✓ | Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry |
SILVER
| ✓ | Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. Dokument the characterization of this part in the Main Page of that Part's/Device's Registry entry. Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry. This part must be different from the part documented in bronze medal criterion #4 |
| ✓ | Convince the judges you have helped any registered iGEM team in a significant way |
| ✓ | Human practices activity |
GOLD
| ✓ | integrated human practices into the design and/or execution of your project |
| ✓ | improve the function OR caracterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device and enter this informaion in the Registry |
| ✓ | Demonstrate a functional proof of concept of your project |
| ✓ | Show your project working under real-world conditions. To achieve this criterion, you should demonstrate your whole system, or a functional proof of concept working under simulated conditions |
Applied Special Tracks
| ✓ | Best Applied Design |
| ✓ | Best New Basic Part |
| ✓ | Best New Composite Part |
| ✓ | Best Part Collection |
| ✓ | Best Hardware |
| ✓ | Best Software Tool |
| ✓ | Best Innovation in Measurement |
| ✓ | Best Model |
