Difference between revisions of "Team:Wageningen UR/Notebook/ecoli survival"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
{{Wageningen_UR/menu}}
 
{{Wageningen_UR/menu}}
−
<html>
+
<html><p> These experiments were performed by Ronald de Jongh.</p>
 
<section id="september">
 
<section id="september">
 
<h1><strong>September</strong></h1>
 
<h1><strong>September</strong></h1>
−
<h2><strong>Week 5</strong></h2>
+
<h2><strong>Week 1</strong></h2>
 
<p>The working method for doing these lab experiments were discussed by the modeller responsible for the Metabolic Model and the experimentalists.
 
<p>The working method for doing these lab experiments were discussed by the modeller responsible for the Metabolic Model and the experimentalists.
 
Experiment 1 from the <i>E. coli</i> survival protocol was done, but failed due to the 96 wells plate having been on a shaker in between steps, causing contamination of wells from other rows. The shaker setup can be seen in figure 1 and the result in figure 2.</p>
 
Experiment 1 from the <i>E. coli</i> survival protocol was done, but failed due to the 96 wells plate having been on a shaker in between steps, causing contamination of wells from other rows. The shaker setup can be seen in figure 1 and the result in figure 2.</p>
Line 23: Line 23:
 
<figcaption>Figure 2. Photo of plate 2 of the first experiment on a lightsource. As all rows are dark, including the ones that were supposed to be kept sterile, we can clearly see the experiment has failed. <figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Figure 2. Photo of plate 2 of the first experiment on a lightsource. As all rows are dark, including the ones that were supposed to be kept sterile, we can clearly see the experiment has failed. <figcaption>
 
</figure><br/>
 
</figure><br/>
−
<h2><strong>Week 6</strong></h2>
+
<h2><strong>Week 2</strong></h2>
 
<p>Experiment 1 was repeated, this time plate 2 was kept stationary in between inoculation steps. The new results can be seen in figure 3. </p>
 
<p>Experiment 1 was repeated, this time plate 2 was kept stationary in between inoculation steps. The new results can be seen in figure 3. </p>
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
Line 31: Line 31:
 
<p>After a successful execution of experiment 1. The next phase was designed and executed, in the protocol this refers to the setup of Table 2. The results are seen in figure 4. </p>
 
<p>After a successful execution of experiment 1. The next phase was designed and executed, in the protocol this refers to the setup of Table 2. The results are seen in figure 4. </p>
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
−
<img height="500" width="300" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/58/T--Wageningen_UR--ecoli_exp2_success.jpg">
+
<img height="300" width="500" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/58/T--Wageningen_UR--ecoli_exp2_success.jpg">
 
<figcaption>Figure 4. Photo of plate 2 of the second experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent 1 hour in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The time step increases for row 3 to 2 hours, etc (as shown in the right side of the photo). Row 8 and all intermediate rows are negative controls.The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions. </figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Figure 4. Photo of plate 2 of the second experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent 1 hour in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The time step increases for row 3 to 2 hours, etc (as shown in the right side of the photo). Row 8 and all intermediate rows are negative controls.The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions. </figcaption>
 
</figure><br/>
 
</figure><br/>
Line 37: Line 37:
 
<p> After showing that the <i>E. coli</i> can survive for 6 hours in extremely high sucrose concentrations of 625g/L, the experiment was continued in a newly prepared plate of LB medium overnight. The result of which can be seen in figure 5.</p>
 
<p> After showing that the <i>E. coli</i> can survive for 6 hours in extremely high sucrose concentrations of 625g/L, the experiment was continued in a newly prepared plate of LB medium overnight. The result of which can be seen in figure 5.</p>
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9f/T--Wageningen_UR--ecoli_exp3_succes.jpg">
+
<img height="300" width="500"  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9f/T--Wageningen_UR--ecoli_exp3_success.jpg">
 
<figcaption>Figure 5. Photo of plate 2 of the third experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent at least 12 hours in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions. </figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Figure 5. Photo of plate 2 of the third experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent at least 12 hours in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions. </figcaption>
  

Latest revision as of 21:23, 19 October 2016

MENU ▤
Wageningen UR iGEM 2016

 

These experiments were performed by Ronald de Jongh.

September

Week 1

The working method for doing these lab experiments were discussed by the modeller responsible for the Metabolic Model and the experimentalists. Experiment 1 from the E. coli survival protocol was done, but failed due to the 96 wells plate having been on a shaker in between steps, causing contamination of wells from other rows. The shaker setup can be seen in figure 1 and the result in figure 2.

Figure 1. Photo of plate 2 of the first experiment on the shaker. We believe this is the reason the contamination of Figure 2 occurred.

Figure 2. Photo of plate 2 of the first experiment on a lightsource. As all rows are dark, including the ones that were supposed to be kept sterile, we can clearly see the experiment has failed.

Week 2

Experiment 1 was repeated, this time plate 2 was kept stationary in between inoculation steps. The new results can be seen in figure 3.

Figure 3. Photo of plate 2 of the repeat of the first experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent 30 minutes in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The time step increases for row 3 to 50 minutes, row 5 to 90 minutes, and row 7 to 120 minutes. Row 8 and all intermediate rows are negative controls. The first three columns are replicates of 0g/L sucrose, then 3 columns of 100g/L sucrose, then 3 columns of 200g/L sucrose, and finally 3 columns of 400g/L sucrose. (The image appears to be flipped upside down for some reason, in case it shows as such, the pencil marks are in the upper right corner of the plate)

After a successful execution of experiment 1. The next phase was designed and executed, in the protocol this refers to the setup of Table 2. The results are seen in figure 4.

Figure 4. Photo of plate 2 of the second experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent 1 hour in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The time step increases for row 3 to 2 hours, etc (as shown in the right side of the photo). Row 8 and all intermediate rows are negative controls.The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions.

After showing that the E. coli can survive for 6 hours in extremely high sucrose concentrations of 625g/L, the experiment was continued in a newly prepared plate of LB medium overnight. The result of which can be seen in figure 5.

Figure 5. Photo of plate 2 of the third experiment. The top row shows growth after having spent at least 12 hours in the sugar water and then overnight growth. The first 4 columns are replicates of 625g/L sucrose concentration, whilst the last 4 columns are replicates of the 312.5g/L sucrose concentration conditions.