Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Collaborations"

 
(35 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Austin_UTexas}}
 
{{Austin_UTexas}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<head>
 +
<style>
 +
body {
 +
    background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/32/T--Austin_UTexas--collabbg.jpg);
 +
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
 +
    background-position: 0px 0px;
 +
    background-attachment:fixed;
 +
    background-size: 100%;
 +
}
 +
</style>
 +
<head>
  
−
<div class="column full_size">
 
−
<h1>Collaborations</h1>
 
  
−
<h2>Texas Tech Collaboration</h2>
+
<body>
−
<p><b> To fulfill the gold medal requirement, the UT Austin team mentored the first year Texas Tech team.</b>
+
<div class="column full_size_outer">
 +
<div class="column full_size_inner">
 +
<h2>Collaborations</h2>
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
The Texas Tech Collaboration page can be found <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Lubbock_TTU/Collaborations">here.</a>
+
<h3>Texas Tech Collaboration</h3>
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e1/T--Austin_UTexas--GellanGum.jpg" style="width:20%; float:right" hspace="10">
+
</html>
−
<p>In the spirit of the collaborative scientific method, the UT Austin team reached out to several other teams. Through this outreach to the iGEM teams of Texas, we began working with the Texas Tech team. This being Texas Tech's first year competing, their team had many questions and concerns about the competition that were brought up when plans for collusion between the two teams were discussed. <p>
+
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/a7/T--Austin_UTexas--Tech.jpg" style="width:20%; float:right; clear:right" hspace="10">
+
−
<p>Over the course of three months, the Tech team has visited Austin three times. The first, was a meeting between two leader representatives where the teams’ initial projects were discussed. This original meetup occurred due to the teams’ plan to collaborate with each other. Tech was to prove that the gellan gum plates project by Jenna McGuffey could be reproduced. UT was to prove an assay made by Tech could be reproduced. Many questions were fielded by the UT representative, such as what terms in iGEM meant and what were the classification for iGEM medals. Therefore, contacts were exchanged so that any further questions provided by the first-year team could be answered, as well as for future correspondence regarding the reproducibility of each teams projects. The second meetup was when a representative from the Tech team visited Austin for the safe and legal exchange fluorescent bacteria from UT to Tech for a workshop that Tech would be giving. During this meeting more questions were answered. At the third meetup occurring at the symposium, the sphingomonas needed to make gellan gum plates were given to Tech, and questions were again fielded regarding deadlines, trip details, medal determinants, and wiki requirements. While UT did not receive an assay from Tech, UT did collaborate with this first year team and aided in the team’s end goal of being a competitive team at the iGEM Jamboree. </p>
+
  
−
 
+
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--GellanGum.jpg|thumb|right|20%|The gellan gum plates that Texas Tech made in lab by following the protocol created by Jenna McGuffey and Erum Dhanji.]]
−
<p>Furthermore, the Tech team team has proven a project that Jenna McGuffey, a member of the iGEM team is working on: agar plates made from sphingamonas.
+
<html>
 +
<p><b> To fulfill the gold medal requirement, the UT Austin team mentored the first year Texas Tech team.</b> The Texas Tech Collaboration page can be found <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Lubbock_TTU/Collaborations">here.</a>
 +
<p>In the collaborative spirit of iGEM, the UT Austin iGEM team reached out to several other teams. Through this outreach, we began communicating with the Texas Tech team. As a new iGEM team participating in the competition for the first time, Texas Tech had several questions about the competition that we attempted to answer during the summer and fall. <p>
 +
</html>
 +
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Tech.jpg|thumb|left|20%|Team member Zach Martinez of UT Austin and Marilyn Mathew of Texas Tech taking a photo at UT Austin after receiving the UT Austin team's fluorescent bacteria.]]
 +
<html>
 +
<p> During this time, members of the Texas Tech team has visited Austin three times. An initial meeting took place between two team representatives to discuss the teams’ projects during the summer. Brandon Palomo of Texas Tech agreed to attempt to replicate Jenna McGuffey’s and Erum Dhanji's results with gellan gum <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas/Results#section7">plates.</a>  At this same meeting, Katelyn Corley of UT Austin helped to answer many of Tech’s questions regarding language in the iGEM rules and classification for iGEM medals. Corley and Palomo exchanged contact information so the teams could continue to collaborate electronically.  In the second meeting, Marilyn Mathew of Texas Tech, originally from Austin, visited our undergraduate research lab to pick up fluorescent bacteria that Texas Tech wished to use for a public workshop relating to community awareness of synthetic biology.  These bacteria were originally created by members of the UT Austin iGEM 2015 <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas">team</a> and have been in continual use by the UT Austin iGEM teams since then.  Members of each team met for a third time at the Texas iGEM meetup at UT Austin in September.  This meetup occurred as part of the University of Texas at Austin Undergraduate Research Symposium. During the third meetup, we provided Texas Tech with the <i>Sphingomonas paucimobilis</i> bacteria required to make gellan gum plates and answered additional questions about the competition, deadlines, trip details, and medal and wiki requirements. We believe we have provided the Texas Tech team with mentorship throughout the course of the summer and fall that should help them be competitive in their first iGEM jamboree. Texas Tech in turn helped our team by testing our team's protocol for creating gellan gum plates with <i>S. paucimobilis.</i>
 +
</p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
−
<br>
+
<h3>Texas iGEM Meet Up</h3>
−
<br>
+
−
<div class="column full_size">
+
−
<h2>Texas iGEM Meet Up</h2>
+
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6e/T--Austin_UTexas--TeamCollab.jpg"  style="width:60%; float:left" hspace="10">
+
−
<p>A Texas iGEM meetup was conducted at the University of Texas Natural Research Symposium. Representatives from both Texas Tech and Rice Universities exhibited their research and discussed the results of their current experiments. Separate from the symposium, together, each of the three teams after the initial presentation of their research, shared their current iGEM results. During this collaborative discussion, each team shared their perspective on the other’s project, whether this was constructive criticism for the order of presentation or whether a slide could be elaborated or praise for a new idea entering the world of synthetic biology. This meetup came to fruition via communications over email, phone, and Facebook. Multiple members of each team worked together to reach out to the other team so that this final meeting could be possible. </p><br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
  
 +
</html>
 +
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--TeamCollab.jpg|thumb|750px|right|Texas Tech, Rice, and UT Austin iGEM team members at the Texas iGEM Meetup.]]
 +
<html>
  
 +
<p> As scientists, synthetic biologists rely on collaboration to develop their ideas. Recognizing the value of feedback from our peer iGEM teams, we reached out to teams from Texas Tech Lubbock, Rice, and Monterrey to see whether they would be interested in organizing a meeting before the jamboree. On Saturday, September 24th, 2016, at the University of Texas Fall Undergraduate Research Symposium, iGEM teams from Rice University, Texas Tech University, and the University of Texas met to discuss their projects and exchange feedback and advice for the competition. As a part of the Natural Science Undergraduate Research Symposium, each team first formally presented a part of their project to an audience of professors, graduate students, as well as undergraduate students. Following this formal presentation was an informal meeting of the teams to strictly focus on each of our iGEM projects. During this collaborative discussion, the teams critiqued each other’s projects. Multiple members of each team organized the meetup via email, phone, and Facebook. Teams enjoyed an early opportunity to discuss their projects with other students enthusiastic about synthetic biology. </p>
 +
<br>
  
  
−
 
+
<h3>Monterrey Collaboration</h3>
−
<h2>Monterrey Collaboration</h2>
+
</html>
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ce/T--Austin_UTexas--Monterrey.jpg" style="width:40%";float:right;clear:right" hspace="10">
+
[[File:T--Austin_UTexas--Monterrey.jpg|thumb|400px|left|A skype call between UT Austin and Monterrey in which UT Austin helped the Monterrey team with their conjugation protocol.]]
−
<p> The team out of Monterrey, Mexico also reached out to the UT Austin team, being their closest neighbor. UT Austin helped the Monterrey team in trouble-shooting conjugation. <p>
+
<html>
 +
<p>The iGEM team from Monterrey, Mexico also reached out to our team as we are their closest iGEM neighbor. UT Austin helped the Monterrey team troubleshoot their conjugation protocol.  The Monterrey team also discussed trying to attend the Texas iGEM meetup, but were unable to make the September meetup.  The teams also discussed helping each other out experimentally, but given the international border, there were some uncertainties on how best to send biological organisms and other materials.  Unfortunately, nothing was sent.</p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
  
−
</div>
+
<div style="clear:both">
−
 
+
−
 
+
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
{{Team:Austin_UTexas/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 23:39, 19 October 2016

Collaborations


Texas Tech Collaboration

The gellan gum plates that Texas Tech made in lab by following the protocol created by Jenna McGuffey and Erum Dhanji.

To fulfill the gold medal requirement, the UT Austin team mentored the first year Texas Tech team. The Texas Tech Collaboration page can be found here.

In the collaborative spirit of iGEM, the UT Austin iGEM team reached out to several other teams. Through this outreach, we began communicating with the Texas Tech team. As a new iGEM team participating in the competition for the first time, Texas Tech had several questions about the competition that we attempted to answer during the summer and fall.

Team member Zach Martinez of UT Austin and Marilyn Mathew of Texas Tech taking a photo at UT Austin after receiving the UT Austin team's fluorescent bacteria.

During this time, members of the Texas Tech team has visited Austin three times. An initial meeting took place between two team representatives to discuss the teams’ projects during the summer. Brandon Palomo of Texas Tech agreed to attempt to replicate Jenna McGuffey’s and Erum Dhanji's results with gellan gum plates. At this same meeting, Katelyn Corley of UT Austin helped to answer many of Tech’s questions regarding language in the iGEM rules and classification for iGEM medals. Corley and Palomo exchanged contact information so the teams could continue to collaborate electronically. In the second meeting, Marilyn Mathew of Texas Tech, originally from Austin, visited our undergraduate research lab to pick up fluorescent bacteria that Texas Tech wished to use for a public workshop relating to community awareness of synthetic biology. These bacteria were originally created by members of the UT Austin iGEM 2015 team and have been in continual use by the UT Austin iGEM teams since then. Members of each team met for a third time at the Texas iGEM meetup at UT Austin in September. This meetup occurred as part of the University of Texas at Austin Undergraduate Research Symposium. During the third meetup, we provided Texas Tech with the Sphingomonas paucimobilis bacteria required to make gellan gum plates and answered additional questions about the competition, deadlines, trip details, and medal and wiki requirements. We believe we have provided the Texas Tech team with mentorship throughout the course of the summer and fall that should help them be competitive in their first iGEM jamboree. Texas Tech in turn helped our team by testing our team's protocol for creating gellan gum plates with S. paucimobilis.


Texas iGEM Meet Up

Texas Tech, Rice, and UT Austin iGEM team members at the Texas iGEM Meetup.

As scientists, synthetic biologists rely on collaboration to develop their ideas. Recognizing the value of feedback from our peer iGEM teams, we reached out to teams from Texas Tech Lubbock, Rice, and Monterrey to see whether they would be interested in organizing a meeting before the jamboree. On Saturday, September 24th, 2016, at the University of Texas Fall Undergraduate Research Symposium, iGEM teams from Rice University, Texas Tech University, and the University of Texas met to discuss their projects and exchange feedback and advice for the competition. As a part of the Natural Science Undergraduate Research Symposium, each team first formally presented a part of their project to an audience of professors, graduate students, as well as undergraduate students. Following this formal presentation was an informal meeting of the teams to strictly focus on each of our iGEM projects. During this collaborative discussion, the teams critiqued each other’s projects. Multiple members of each team organized the meetup via email, phone, and Facebook. Teams enjoyed an early opportunity to discuss their projects with other students enthusiastic about synthetic biology.


Monterrey Collaboration

A skype call between UT Austin and Monterrey in which UT Austin helped the Monterrey team with their conjugation protocol.

The iGEM team from Monterrey, Mexico also reached out to our team as we are their closest iGEM neighbor. UT Austin helped the Monterrey team troubleshoot their conjugation protocol. The Monterrey team also discussed trying to attend the Texas iGEM meetup, but were unable to make the September meetup. The teams also discussed helping each other out experimentally, but given the international border, there were some uncertainties on how best to send biological organisms and other materials. Unfortunately, nothing was sent.