Difference between revisions of "Team:Marburg/Collaborations"

 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Marburg/navigation}}
 
{{Marburg/navigation}}
 +
{{Marburg/master_heading}}
  
 
<html lang="en">
 
<html lang="en">
Line 29: Line 30:
 
          
 
          
 
         <!-- Content -->
 
         <!-- Content -->
−
       
 
−
<!-- Overall header -->
 
−
<div class="container">
 
−
   
 
−
    <div class="master-heading">
 
−
        <h1>
 
−
            SynDustry <small>Fuse. Use. Produce.</small>
 
−
        </h1>
 
−
    </div>
 
−
 
−
</div>
 
  
 
<!-- Heading -->
 
<!-- Heading -->
 
<div class="container">
 
<div class="container">
 
     <div class="heading">
 
     <div class="heading">
−
         <h2>Collaboration: Theory and Experiment</h2>
+
         <h2>Collaboration connecting Theory and Experiment</h2>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 55: Line 45:
  
 
             <p>
 
             <p>
−
This year our iGEM team implemented a trans-atlantic collaboration with the iGEM team 2016 from <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Lethbridge">Lethbridge</a>, Canada. Our joined attempt was to determine the evolutionary stability of kill switches from both, theoretical and experimental side. While we were contributing the theoretical modeling part, our colleagues in Canada worked on the experimental evidence of our drylab predictions. We worked on suitable experiment design for their hands-on part. To help them out we had also the necessary genes for the MazF killswitch synthesized and shipped. The results of this joint project can be found in our modelling section. We are hoping that this fruitful collaboroation will continue.
+
This year our iGEM team established a transatlantic collaboration with the iGEM team 2016 from <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Lethbridge">Lethbridge</a>, Canada. Our joined attempt was to determine the evolutionary stability of kill switches from both, theoretical and experimental side. While we were contributing the theoretical modeling part, our colleagues in Canada worked on the experimental evidence of our drylab predictions. We worked on suitable experiment design for their hands-on part together. To help them out we had also the necessary genes for the MazF kill switch synthesized and shipped. Figures 1 and 2 show experimental work with the BNU China 2014 kill switch: Before applying UV light, the kill switch works and kill the cells reliably (figure 1). However, after application of UV light that mutates the cells, the kill switch is destroyed and genetically modified cells survive the escape into wild life conditions (figure 2). This emphasizes the danger of evolutionary unstable kill switches. Further details on their procedure can be found on their <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Lethbridge/Collaborations">wiki</a>.
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
          
 
          
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
          
 
          
 +
    </div>
 +
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-sm-12">
 +
 +
            <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/94/T--Marburg--collaboration.figure_1.png">
 +
                <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/94/T--Marburg--collaboration.figure_1.png"
 +
                    class="img-responsive center-block figure_img" alt="Figure 1" width="400">
 +
            </a>
 +
 +
            <div class="figure_text">
 +
                <b>Figure 1. Cell cultures with implemented BNU China 2014 kill switch before exposure to UV light.</b> The working
 +
                kill switch ensures cell death once released into wild life conditions.
 +
            </div>
 +
 +
        </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
 +
    <div class="row">
 +
        <div class="col-sm-12">
 +
 +
            <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d2/T--Marburg--collaboration.figure_2.png">
 +
                <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d2/T--Marburg--collaboration.figure_2.png"
 +
                    class="img-responsive center-block figure_img" alt="Figure 1" width="400">
 +
            </a>
 +
 +
            <div class="figure_text">
 +
                <b>Figure 2. Cell cultures with implemented BNU China 2014 kill switch after exposure to UV light.</b> The kill switch has been destroyed through mutations and cells survive release into wild life conditions.
 +
            </div>
 +
 +
        </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
      
 
      

Latest revision as of 14:40, 2 December 2016

SynDustry Fuse. Produce. Use.

Projects :: Syndustry - iGEM Marburg 2016

Collaboration connecting Theory and Experiment

This year our iGEM team established a transatlantic collaboration with the iGEM team 2016 from Lethbridge, Canada. Our joined attempt was to determine the evolutionary stability of kill switches from both, theoretical and experimental side. While we were contributing the theoretical modeling part, our colleagues in Canada worked on the experimental evidence of our drylab predictions. We worked on suitable experiment design for their hands-on part together. To help them out we had also the necessary genes for the MazF kill switch synthesized and shipped. Figures 1 and 2 show experimental work with the BNU China 2014 kill switch: Before applying UV light, the kill switch works and kill the cells reliably (figure 1). However, after application of UV light that mutates the cells, the kill switch is destroyed and genetically modified cells survive the escape into wild life conditions (figure 2). This emphasizes the danger of evolutionary unstable kill switches. Further details on their procedure can be found on their wiki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cell cultures with implemented BNU China 2014 kill switch before exposure to UV light. The working kill switch ensures cell death once released into wild life conditions.
Figure 1
Figure 2. Cell cultures with implemented BNU China 2014 kill switch after exposure to UV light. The kill switch has been destroyed through mutations and cells survive release into wild life conditions.