Difference between revisions of "Team:Wageningen UR/Notebook/QuorumSensing"

Line 106: Line 106:
  
 
<section id="4">
 
<section id="4">
<h1><b>June 30 - July 31</b></h1>
+
<h1>July 25th - August 7th </h1>
<p>
+
<b>General</b><br>
+
Electrocompetent E. coli cells were made according to the <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Wageningen_UR--Preparing_and_transforming_DH5%CE%B1_electrocompetent_cells.pdf">protocol</a>. Transformation efficiency was very high (could not count the colonies, really).
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<b>Moving dCas9 to pET26B</b><br>
+
New PCR products were made of pdCas9 and pET26B. I proceeded with purification and <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/ac/T--Wageningen_UR--Restriction_Enzyme_Digestion.pdf">digestion</a> as usual, but added a step with alkaline phosphatase (CIP, NEB).
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Performed a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--Wageningen_UR--Ligation.pdf">ligation</a> and <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Wageningen_UR--Preparing_and_transforming_DH5%CE%B1_electrocompetent_cells.pdf">electroporation</a> of ligation. This time cloning was more successful: some colonies on ligation mixture, no colonies on backbone only control.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f8/T--Wageningen_UR--Colony_PCR.pdf">Colony PCR</a> revealed that some colonies probably contained the correct construct. This was verified by sequencing. </p>
+
  
<figure>
+
<h2>434- and λ cI repressor operon construction</h2>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/94/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_caspet_colPCR.JPG">
+
<p>We sent ‘colony 35’ for GATC lightrun Sanger sequencing. The sequencing revealed that all fragments except BBa_K081007 were assembled in pSB1C3. We designed (and ordered from NEB) primers with overhangs for amplification for a second step of GA to include BBa_K081007 in the construct.
</figure><br/>
+
Primers: 109 - 110.</p>
  
<p>
+
<p>We used the primers for Q5 PCR to amplify BBa_K081007 and the plasmid from ‘colony 35’ for GA. Both reactions yielded band of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. We purified the reactions using the Machery-Nagel kit for PCR purification and eluted in milli-Q water. </p>
<br>
+
<b>Collection and construction of pEVOL plasmids</b><br>
+
We received the biocontainment strains from Harvard, from which pEVOL-BipA was extracted (Machery-Nagel nucleospin kit).  
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<b>Construction of pT7-gRNA plasmids</b>
+
The following primers were <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Experiments#cas3">annealed</a> as inserts:
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1766-1785 FWD fwd
+
5’- TAGGgtggtccgctgccgttcgct-3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1766-1785 FWD rev
+
5’- AAACagcgaacggcagcggaccac-3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1739-1758 REV fwd
+
5’- TAGGaactttcagtttagcggtct -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1739-1758 REV rev
+
5’- AAACagaccgctaaactgaaagtt -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1821-1840 FWD fwd
+
5’- TAGGcaaagcttacgttaaacacc -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1821-1840 FWD rev
+
5’- AAACggtgtttaacgtaagctttg -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1803-1822 REV fwd
+
5’- TAGGtggaaccgtactggaactgc -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pBbS5a (RFP) 1803-1822 REV rev
+
5’- AAACgcagttccagtacggttcca -3’
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
We tried at first constructing the pT7-gRNA plasmids using protocol described in Jao et al. (2014), but this gave a lot of false positive colonies (on plates transformed without any insert). <br>
+
Still, some plasmids were <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Wageningen_UR--MiniPrep.pdf">isolated</a> from colonies of plates with insert, and <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/ac/T--Wageningen_UR--Restriction_Enzyme_Digestion.pdf">digested</a> with SalI-HF and ScaI-HF. Any positive clones should not be cut by SalI, because this restriction site is only present in the original backbone. Expected bands: 759 bp and 1782 bp. No positive clones were found. </p>
+
  
<figure>
+
<p>We used the purified PCR reaction in GA with NEB HiFi mastermix according to the corresponding protocol. We saved part of the reaction after 15m at 50℃ and left the rest to react for 60m 50℃. We purified the GA reaction with the Zymo Research DNA clean and concentrator kit. We transformed 5µl the 15m reaction to NEB chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lisa transferred the plates from 37℃ to 4℃.</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/64/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_gRNAfail.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
  
<p><br>
+
<h2>mRFP cI protein balance reporter construction</h2>
The next strategy was to <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/ac/T--Wageningen_UR--Restriction_Enzyme_Digestion.pdf">digest</a> with BsmBI and SalI, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b9/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Extraction_of_DNA.pdf">isolate the linearized plasmid from gel</a>, and proceed with a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/76/T--Wageningen_UR--Ligation.pdf">ligation</a>. </p>
+
<p>We designed primers with overhangs for amplification of biobricks in Benchling for subsequent GA and ordered those primers from NEB:
 +
Primers designed for parts: BBa_I12006, BBa_K081007, BBa_K081014 and pSB1C3.
 +
Primers: 113 - 118. </p>
  
<figure>
+
<p>We used the primers for Q5 PCR to amplify the fragments for GA. All reactions yielded band of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. pSB1C3 again could only successfully be amplified with primers suffix-forward and prefix-reverse. We purified the reactions using the Machery-Nagel kit for PCR purification and eluted in milli-Q water. </p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0e/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_gRNA_dig.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
  
<p><br>
+
<p>We used the purified PCR reaction in GA with NEB HiFi mastermix according to the corresponding protocol. We saved part of the reaction after 15m at 50℃ and left the rest to react for 60m 50℃. We purified the GA reaction with the Zymo Research DNA clean and concentrator kit. We transformed 5µl the 60m reaction to NEB chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lisa transferred the plates from 37℃ to 4℃.</p>
This did give us some positive clones. </p>
+
  
<figure>
+
<h2>Quorum sensing GFP reporter construction</h2>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/73/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_gRNA_success.JPG">
+
<p>We designed two flanked forward primers to elongate (in two PCR steps) the 5’ end of BBa_K081012 with the sequence of promoter BBa_R0062. We ordered the primers from IDT. </p>
</figure><br/>
+
  
<p><br>
+
<p>We did Q5 PCR on BBa_K081012 with the primers 111 and VR, got a band of the expected size (around 1kb). We purified the PCR product with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit. We then used a dilution hereof for a seconds step with purification with primers 112 and VR. We also amplified (Q5 PCR) pSB1C3 with primers suffix-forward and prefix-reverse to linearize the backbone. Both PCRs yielded bands of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. We then purified both PCR products with the Machery-Nagel kit and protocol. </p>
Procedure was repeated for gRNA 3 and 4. Results were later confirmed by sequencing (however, it turned out that gRNA 3 was not correct after all. It took another round of picking colonies/digestion/sequencing before we also got that one right).  
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<b>Mutagenesis of dCas9-pET26B</b><br>
+
The Ala10TAG and Ala840TAG mutations were introduced by <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Experiments#cas1">mutagenesis PCR</a>, using the following primers:
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
dCas9 Ala10TAG fwd
+
5'-ggcaaaaatggataagaaatactcaataggcttatagatcggcacaaatagcgtc-3'
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
dCas9 Ala10TAG rev
+
5'-gacgctatttgtgccgatctataagcctattgagtatttcttatccatttttgcc-3'
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
dCas9 Ala840TAG fwd
+
5'-taatcgtttaagtgattatgatgtcgattagattgttccacaaagtttccttaaagacg-3'
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
dCas9 Ala840TAG rev
+
5'-cgtctttaaggaaactttgtggaacaatctaatcgacatcataatcacttaaacgatta-3'
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
First PCRs revealed that only the Ala840TAG PCR was successful, as was revealed by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0a/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Electrophoresis.pdf">gel electrophoresis</a> (expected band size for both: 9077 bp). </p>
+
  
<figure>
+
<h2>Quorum sensing 2 plasmid system construction</h2>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_mutpcr_1.JPG">
+
<p>We Q5 PCR amplified BBa_K546000 and pSB4K5 with primers VF2 + VR and suffix-f + prefix-r. Both PCRs yielded bands of the expected size on agarose gel. We purified both PCR products with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit and corresponding protocol. </p>
</figure><br/>
+
  
<p><br>
+
<p>We, then started digestion of 1µg of both purified products with EcoRI-HF and PstI-HF, both from NEB and according to the NEB digestion protocol 15m at 37℃. We purified both digestion products with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit and protocol.</p>
The Ala10TAG mutation worked after addition of GC enhancer to the PCR mixture. </p>
+
 
 +
<p>We started ligation with NEB T4 according to the NEB T4 ligase protocol. We used 50ng of pSB4K5 and 3 times as much moles of the BBa_K546000 insert. Ligation took place overnight at 16℃. We then purified the ligation reaction with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit according to the manufacturer's protocol.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The ligation was transformed using homemade electrocompetent cells. The transformations were spread on LB agar plates with Kanamycin. The transformation yielded plates with moderate amount of colonies. </p>
  
<figure>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/a9/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_mutpcr_2.JPG">
 
</figure><br/>
 
  
<p><br>
 
Mutations were verified after sequencing of <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Wageningen_UR--MiniPrep.pdf">isolated</a> plasmids. </p>
 
 
</section>
 
</section>
  
 
<section id="5">
 
<section id="5">
<h1><b>Aug 1 - Aug 31</b></h1>
+
<h1>August 8th - August 21st</h1>
 
+
<p>
+
<b>Expression of Cas9-pET26B in C321ΔA</b><br>
+
Cas9-pET26B constructs as well as iGEM-Cas9 and the original pdCas9 were transformed in E. coli C321ΔA as described in Lajoie <i>et. al</i> (2013) protocol<sup><a href="#bp1" id="refbp1">1</a></sup> for electroporation, successfully.
+
Later, also, pEVOL-BipA, pEVOL-pAzF and pEVOL-pBpF were transformed into C321ΔA, both with and without Cas9-pET26B constructs.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
A first expression experiment was done with 50 ml overnight cultures of C321ΔA + Cas9 construct, in LB with the appropriate antibiotic.
+
<br>
+
Cells were spun down, resuspended in 10 ml lysis buffer (50mM Tris-HCL, 250 mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA) and lysed by sonication (4x15 sec, 25Am).
+
<br>
+
Protein concentrations were measured with a Bradford assay.</p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/ae/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_bradford_1.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
20 ug of each extract was loaded on SDS to check for Cas9 expression. The expected weight of Cas9 is 156 kDa, of dCas9-Ala10TAG is 1 kDa (can’t be seen anyways), and of dCas9-Ala840TAG it is 97 kDa. No such bands could be observed (possible also due to a background band of the same size)</p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f0/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_sds_caspet.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
because for the original iGEM construct, the band seemed to be a bit more pronounced, I grew new cultures and repeated the experiment. This time, it was really obvious that expression levels were too low. </p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/67/T--Wageningen_UR--iGEMCas9SDS.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
<i><b>in vitro</i> transcription of guide RNAs</b>
+
By the time of transcription, guide 3 had not been verified by sequencing yet, so only guide 1, 2 and 4 were transcribed and purified, according to the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Experiments#cas4">protocol</a>.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
I only have a picture of the gel after cutting the RNA bands, but they were present. </p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b0/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_gRNA_transcribed.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
After purification, guide 2 and 4 had decent concentrations of ~350 ng/uL. Guide 1 had only 35 ng/uL.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<b>Cloning of Cas9 variants in expresso vector</b><br>
+
After discussion with an employee in the departement who has experience expressing <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Cas9, it was decided that expression from pdCas9 is probably too low to visualize on SDS-PAGE, and perhaps not suitable for further <i>in vitro</i> testing.
+
<br>
+
So it was decided to clone Cas9 in the <a href="http://www.lucigen.com/Expresso-Rhamnose-Cloning-and-Protein-Expression-System/">Expresso c-rham vector system</a>.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
First, Cas9 variants and the Expresso vector were amplified by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/27/T--Wageningen_UR--Polymerase_Chain_Reaction.pdf">PCR</a>. The following reactions were performed:
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Expresso<br>
+
fwd: CATCATCACCACCATCACTAATAG<br>
+
Rev: CATATGTATATCTCCTTCTTATAGTTAAAC<br>
+
Annealing T: 59ºC, elongation time 2.5 minutes.<br>
+
Expected band size: 2275 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
iGEM Cas9<br>
+
Fwd: gtttaactataagaaggagatatacatatgGATAAGAAATACTCAATAGGCTTAGATATC<br>
+
Rev: gccgctctattagtgatggtggtgatgatgGTCACCTCCTAGCTGACTCAAATC<br>
+
Annealing T: 64ºC, elongation time 2.5 minutes.<br>
+
Expected band size: 4088 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
dCas9 & Ala840TAG:<br>
+
Fwd: gtttaactataagaaggagatatacatatgGATAAGAAATACTCAATAGGCTTAGCTATC<br>
+
Rev: gccgctctattagtgatggtggtgatgatgGTCACCTCCTAGCTGACTCAAATC<br>
+
Annealing T: 66ºC, elongation time 2.5 minutes.<br>
+
Expected band size: 4088 bp
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Ala10TAG:<br>
+
Fwd: gtttaactataagaaggagatatacatatgGATAAGAAATACTCAATAGGCTTATAGATC<br>
+
Rev: gccgctctattagtgatggtggtgatgatgGTCACCTCCTAGCTGACTCAAATC<br>
+
Annealing T: 64ºC, elongation time 2.5 minutes.<br>
+
Expected band size: 4088 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Positive control: Some ~2000 bp thing from Thomas with iGEM prefix and suffix primers.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Fragments were checked by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0a/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Electrophoresis.pdf">gel electrophoresis</a>. </p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/29/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_cas_expr_pcr.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
PCR products were cleaned with Zymo kit (hyperlink), eluted in water and assembled by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/18/T--Wageningen_UR--HiFi_Gibson_Assembly.pdf">Gibson Assembly</a>. A vector : insert ratio of 1 : 2 was used, with 100 ng vector. 1 uL of Gibson mixtures were transformed in 25uL commercial competent cells (NEB) according to the accompanying protocol and plated on LB plates with kanamycin.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Colonies that came up were verified with <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f8/T--Wageningen_UR--Colony_PCR.pdf">Colony PCR</a>.<br>
+
Primers that were used: <br>
+
Fwd: TTGAAGGGTAGTCCAGAAG<br>
+
Rev: CATATGTATATCTCCTTCTTATAGTTAAAC<br>
+
Annealing T: 46ºC, elongation time 3 minutes. <br>
+
Expected band size: 2647 bp. <br>
+
<br>
+
PCRs were verified using <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0a/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Electrophoresis.pdf">gel electrophoresis</a>. It seemed that there were a lot of positive colonies. </p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6b/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_cas_expr_colPCR.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
Correct clones were confirmed by sequencing.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<b>Collection and construction of pEVOL plasmids</b><br>
+
pEVOL-Asp was constructed according to the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Experiments#cas2">yeast assembly protocol</a>.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pEVOL-pAzF<br>
+
Fwd: ACTAGTGCATGCTCGAGCAG<br>
+
Rev: CCTCCTGTTAGCCCAAAAAAACGGGTATG<br>
+
Annealing T: 68ºC, elongation time 2 minutes. <br>
+
Expected band size: ~3320 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
pYES2<br>
+
Fwd: gagcaggcttttttactagtACTCTTCCTTTTTCAATGGG<br>
+
Rev: aaagcaaattcgaccctgagctgctcgagcatgcactagtAAATATTTGCTTATACAATCTTCC<br>
+
Annealing T: 56ºC, elongation time 2 minutes. <br>
+
Expected band size: 2667 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
gBlock1<br>
+
Fwd: gagcaggcttttttactagtACTCTTCCTTTTTCAATGGG<br>
+
Rev: ACAGGGTATTGCTTACGTACCAACTC<br>
+
Annealing T: 66ºC, elongation time 2 minutes. <br>
+
Expected band size: 1203 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
gBlock2<br>
+
Fwd: TTGCTCATGAAATTGAGTTGGTACGTAAG<br>
+
Rev: CCCATTGAAAAAGGAAGAGTACTAG<br>
+
Annealing T: 64ºC, elongation time 2minutes. <br>
+
Expected band size: 1230 bp<br>
+
<br>
+
PCR products were verified using <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0a/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Electrophoresis.pdf">gel electrophoresis</a>. </p>
+
 
+
<figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/6c/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_pevol_asp_pcr.JPG">
+
</figure><br/>
+
 
+
<p><br>
+
PCR products were cleaned up using the Zymo kit (hyperlink).
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
Then, yeast assembly was performed using the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Experiments#cas2">protocol</a>, with competent yeast cells received from a supervisor.
+
<br>
+
From the resulting colonies, 6 were picked for <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Wageningen_UR--MiniPrep.pdf">plasmid isolation</a>. Only 3 of them had some plasmid yield, which were checked for correct assembly using OneTaq <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/27/T--Wageningen_UR--Polymerase_Chain_Reaction.pdf">PCR</a>.
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
PCR reactions that were performed:
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
pEVOL fwd and gBlock 1 rev primers, annealing T: 56ºC, elongation 4 minutes. Expected fragment size: 4469 bp. <br>
+
gBlock 1 fwd and gBlock 2 rev primers, annealing T: 50ºC, elongation 4 minutes. Expected fragment size: 2318 bp. <br>
+
<br>
+
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0a/T--Wageningen_UR--Gel_Electrophoresis.pdf">gel electrophoresis</a> reveiled fragments of the right size for colony 2 and 3. </p>
+
  
<figure>
+
<h2>434- and λ cI repressor operon construction</h2>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/ca/T--Wageningen_UR--Belnote_pevol_asp_colPCR.JPG">
+
<p>Transformation of the GA for assembly of the 434- and λ cI repressor operon plasmid yielded many colonies. We screened for clones with the correct insert through taq colony PCR with primers biobrick-forward and biobrick-reverse. Prior to colony PCR, the colonies were grown in 40µl LB medium inside a 96-wells plate for 30m. 1µl of the medium was used as template for the colony PCR. All screened colonies were found to contain an insert of the correct size. </p>
</figure><br/>
+
  
<p><br>
 
Eventually, the plasmid from colony 3 was <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/00/T--Wageningen_UR--Preparing_and_transforming_DH5%CE%B1_electrocompetent_cells.pdf">transformed</a> successfully in <i>E. coli</i>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bd/T--Wageningen_UR--MiniPrep.pdf">miniprepped</a> and sent for sequencing. The following mutations were present: Tryp156Cys, Gly321Val and Gly525Cys. Because there was no time to check other clones, I continued with this plasmid anyways.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<b>Expression of Cas9-expresso constructs in C321ΔA</b><br>
 
Both the acquired Cas9-expresso constructs as well as pEVOL-Asp were transformed into C321ΔA as described in <i>Lajoie et al.</i> (2013)<sup><a href="#bp1" id="refbp1">1</a></sup>.
 
 
</section>
 
</section>
  

Revision as of 15:26, 17 October 2016

Wageningen UR iGEM 2016

 

General

When cells or bacteria are described in the population dynamics notebook, those bacteria were E. coli DH5alpha. Unless stated otherwise, all actions performed for the wetlab construction and testing of the population dynamics subproject were done by Thomas. Where Arabinose and/or Glucose are mentioned, we refer to L-Arabinose and D-Glucose respectively in concentrations of 2 g/L. Where sequencing of DNA is mentioned we refer to GATC lightrun tube sanger sequencing. Where it is mentioned that samples were sent for sequencing - unless stated otherwise - the sequencing results corresponded to the expected sequence.

Plate reader measurements:

The machine used for plate reader experiments is BioTek’s SynergyMx. Gen5 2.01 software was used to acquire the data and export these to microsoft excel files which were further organized with Microsoft Excel 2011. All plate reader measurements were done in black 96-wells plates with a transparent bottom. During measurements the lid was on the plate in all cases to prevent mixing of sample due to shaking during incubation. All reported experiments were performed at 37℃ with fast continuous shaking. Measurements described were always at least 10 minutes apart to allow for proper shaking of the samples and allow for sufficient aeration. GFP activity was measured with fluorescence measurements with an excitation at 485nm and emission at 510nm. mRFP activity was measured for excitation at 584nm and emission at 607nm. Bandwidth for fluorescence was always 9nm. Wells contained 200µl cultures. Absorbance was measured at both 600nm and 660nm to assess bacterial growth. Absorbance data for bacterial cultures were corrected with the absorbance of medium only wells. This caused absorbance to start at 0 for all cultures, the first measurements notwithstanding. Fluorescence values were corrected for the fluorescence of medium only wells. This sometimes caused negative values for the fluorescence of cultures at low OD600 values. This of course it not realistic and was considered an artifact caused by fluctuations in the measurement of low level fluorescence.

Flow Cytometry

The machine used for flow cytometry in Wageningen is the Flow cytometry sorter - BD FACS AriaTM III. This machine is in principle also able to sort cells, but we did not make use of this function. Marcel H. Tempelaars, Specialist Flow cytometry sorter - BD FACS AriaTM III at Wageningen UR operated the controls while Thomas was responsible for sample handling and insertion. Marcel meanwhile explained the functioning of the technique.

During the flow cytometry analysis we found that the choice of mRFP as reporter was a good one: we observed a clear difference in fluorescence between the mRFP producing cells and cells that did not have a mRFP gene. Differentiation between GFP expressing cells and cells unable to produce GFP is known to be more troublesome. Therefore we advise future iGEM team planning to do flow cytometry of FACS to (if at all possible) use mRFP as reporter rather than GFP.

Fluorescence Microscopy

The microscope used for fluorescence microscopy of the subpopulation clones is an Olympus BX41. The laser used to excite fluorophores is Excelitas Technologies X-cite series 120. A lumenera infinity 3 was used to capture the images. Steven Aalvink, technician at Wageningen UR molecular ecology, instructed me in the use of the microscope and other hardware.

May 9th - July 3th:

General

Belwina, Marijn and Thomas transformed biobrick parts from the registry to home-made chemically competent DH5alpha cells. They spread the transformations on LB agar plates with antibiotics corresponding to the resistance in the backbone of each plasmid. Transformed parts (table 1). We isolated (Machery-Nagel nucleospin kit) the plasmids from liquid cultures of these transformation plates.

Table1. Biobrick transformations

July 4th - July 17th:

General

We verified the length (through taq PCR) and sequence (through GATC lightrun sanger sequencing) of the biobrick isolated (May 9th - July 3th) plasmid inserts. We also made -80℃ glycerol stocks for cells containing the parts.

434- and λ cI repressor operon construction

We designed primers with overhangs for amplification of biobricks in Benchling for subsequent Gibson assembly (GA) and ordered those primers from NEB: Primers designed for parts: BBa_B0015, BBa_C0052, BBa_I0500, BBa_K081007 and pSB1C3. Primers:897 - 908.

We used primers 897 - 906 for Q5 PCR to amplify the parts for GA. We was unable to amplify pSB1C3 with the flanked primers through numerous attempts. We then realized that (because of the overhangs in the other fragments) the fragments all already contain 20 + bp overlap with each other required for GA. We chose to Q5 PCR amplify pSB1C3 with primers suffix-forward and prefix-reverse and use this PCR product with the previously mentioned PCR products for the other fragments.

We did a first attempt to Gibson assemble BBa_K1913007 using (unpurified) PCR reactions of BBa_B0015, BBa_C0052, BBa_I0500, BBa_K081007 and pSB1C3 mentioned before. We used NEB GA mastermix and followed the corresponding protocol. We used 0.2 to 2.0 µl of 50 ng/µl dilutions of the PCR product to use 75 ng of pSB1C3 and 2.5 as much moles of the other fragments, except for B0015 where 5 times the backbone concentration was used. After assembly, we transformed the mixture to electro competent cells prepared beforehand by Belwina. The plates were kindly transferred from 37℃ to 4℃ by Alex (supervisor).

We did a colony taq PCR of 48 of the resulting colonies to screen for successful assembly clones. We found one clone (‘colony 35’) that showed a substantially bigger insert than the background found in the other colonies and in the negative control.

Figure 1. Colony PCR gel 434 GA (1st try) transformation.

We made -80℃ glycerol stocks and isolated the plasmid from ‘colony 35’ using the Machery-Nagel plasmid isolation kit. We did a verification PCR on the isolated plasmid and found that the insert size is shorter than it should be.

July 25th - August 7th

434- and λ cI repressor operon construction

We sent ‘colony 35’ for GATC lightrun Sanger sequencing. The sequencing revealed that all fragments except BBa_K081007 were assembled in pSB1C3. We designed (and ordered from NEB) primers with overhangs for amplification for a second step of GA to include BBa_K081007 in the construct. Primers: 109 - 110.

We used the primers for Q5 PCR to amplify BBa_K081007 and the plasmid from ‘colony 35’ for GA. Both reactions yielded band of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. We purified the reactions using the Machery-Nagel kit for PCR purification and eluted in milli-Q water.

We used the purified PCR reaction in GA with NEB HiFi mastermix according to the corresponding protocol. We saved part of the reaction after 15m at 50℃ and left the rest to react for 60m 50℃. We purified the GA reaction with the Zymo Research DNA clean and concentrator kit. We transformed 5µl the 15m reaction to NEB chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lisa transferred the plates from 37℃ to 4℃.

mRFP cI protein balance reporter construction

We designed primers with overhangs for amplification of biobricks in Benchling for subsequent GA and ordered those primers from NEB: Primers designed for parts: BBa_I12006, BBa_K081007, BBa_K081014 and pSB1C3. Primers: 113 - 118.

We used the primers for Q5 PCR to amplify the fragments for GA. All reactions yielded band of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. pSB1C3 again could only successfully be amplified with primers suffix-forward and prefix-reverse. We purified the reactions using the Machery-Nagel kit for PCR purification and eluted in milli-Q water.

We used the purified PCR reaction in GA with NEB HiFi mastermix according to the corresponding protocol. We saved part of the reaction after 15m at 50℃ and left the rest to react for 60m 50℃. We purified the GA reaction with the Zymo Research DNA clean and concentrator kit. We transformed 5µl the 60m reaction to NEB chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lisa transferred the plates from 37℃ to 4℃.

Quorum sensing GFP reporter construction

We designed two flanked forward primers to elongate (in two PCR steps) the 5’ end of BBa_K081012 with the sequence of promoter BBa_R0062. We ordered the primers from IDT.

We did Q5 PCR on BBa_K081012 with the primers 111 and VR, got a band of the expected size (around 1kb). We purified the PCR product with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit. We then used a dilution hereof for a seconds step with purification with primers 112 and VR. We also amplified (Q5 PCR) pSB1C3 with primers suffix-forward and prefix-reverse to linearize the backbone. Both PCRs yielded bands of the expected sizes in agarose gel electrophoresis. We then purified both PCR products with the Machery-Nagel kit and protocol.

Quorum sensing 2 plasmid system construction

We Q5 PCR amplified BBa_K546000 and pSB4K5 with primers VF2 + VR and suffix-f + prefix-r. Both PCRs yielded bands of the expected size on agarose gel. We purified both PCR products with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit and corresponding protocol.

We, then started digestion of 1µg of both purified products with EcoRI-HF and PstI-HF, both from NEB and according to the NEB digestion protocol 15m at 37℃. We purified both digestion products with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit and protocol.

We started ligation with NEB T4 according to the NEB T4 ligase protocol. We used 50ng of pSB4K5 and 3 times as much moles of the BBa_K546000 insert. Ligation took place overnight at 16℃. We then purified the ligation reaction with the Machery-Nagel PCR purification kit according to the manufacturer's protocol.

The ligation was transformed using homemade electrocompetent cells. The transformations were spread on LB agar plates with Kanamycin. The transformation yielded plates with moderate amount of colonies.

August 8th - August 21st

434- and λ cI repressor operon construction

Transformation of the GA for assembly of the 434- and λ cI repressor operon plasmid yielded many colonies. We screened for clones with the correct insert through taq colony PCR with primers biobrick-forward and biobrick-reverse. Prior to colony PCR, the colonies were grown in 40µl LB medium inside a 96-wells plate for 30m. 1µl of the medium was used as template for the colony PCR. All screened colonies were found to contain an insert of the correct size.

Sept 1 - Okt 10

Expression of Cas9-expresso constructs in C321ΔA
An expression experiment was performed with 3 ml cultures induced overnight with rhamnose, arabinose and synthetic amino acids when applicable. This yielded no visible Cas9 bands. The same happened when 5 ml cultures where induced for 4 hours. What worked, was the protocol with bigger volumes followed by Ni-NTA purification (the majority of the actual work with the FPLC was performed by a supervisor)

First, samples were purified as described, but with addition of DNAse. This gave good yields, but DNAse remained in the purified fractions as was later found out during in vitro Cas9 assays. However, without DNAse also a good yield was obtained.

Click the figure for the full-resolution image.

The green line indicates the amount of His buffer B that is passed through the column.

Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of fractions after FPLC purification of Cas9 variants. Cas9 = 156 kDa. Red boxes indicate 150 kDa band of the ladder, red arrows indicates bands of the correct size corresponding to Cas9. The black arrow indicates elution with increasing concentration of Imidazole. a) Cas9. b) dCas9. c) dCas9-Ala10BipA. d) dCas9-Ala10Asp. e)dCas9-Ala10TAG, no synthetic amino acid. Ladder: Precision Plus protein ladder (Bio-Rad). CFE = Cell Free Extract.


in vitro Cas9 cleaving assays
Assays were performed with all produced guide RNAs, according to the protocol.

Figure 3. in vitro Cas9 activity assays with Cas9, dCas9 and dCas9-Ala10Asp. Substrate for cleaving is a PCR product including the gene encoding RFP, which is targeted at the N-terminal side, both on the template strand (guideRNA 2 and 4) and the non-template strand (gRNA 1). Size of the uncleaved PCR product is 4140 bp, cleaving generates a 3100 bp and a 1040 bp fragment. Ladder: 1kb (NEB).

References

1. ajoie, M. J., Rovner, A. J., Goodman, D. B., Aerni, H. R., Haimovich, A. D., Kuznetsov, G., ... & Rohland, N. (2013). Genomically recoded organisms expand biological functions. Science, 342(6156), 357-360.