|
|
| Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| | </html> | | </html> |
| | {{Wageningen_UR/footer}} | | {{Wageningen_UR/footer}} |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | �
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Angelina’s Notebook
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h1>May</h1>
| |
| − | <b>Week 1</b><br>
| |
| − | <li>literature research about quorum sensing systems</li>
| |
| − | <li> drawing quorum sensing system</li>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <b>Week 2</b><br>
| |
| − | <li>writing quorum sensing equations</li>
| |
| − | <li>writing scripts in Matlab</li>
| |
| − | <li> testing first scripts for a single cell, simulate the model response vs time</li>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <b>Week 3</b><br>
| |
| − | <li> first results on single cell scripts tested with 10 cells and 10000 parameter sets</li>
| |
| − | <li> expanding model for multi cell population with 10 cells and 10000 parameter sets</li>
| |
| − | <li> testing multi cell, simulate the model response vs time </li>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <b>Week 4</b><br>
| |
| − | Look at correlations of different parameters in the model. Simulate the model for the GFP response with different parameter sets:, low, medium and high set.
| |
| − | implement positive and negative feedback of LuxR in the system. Test whether the mRNA transcription of LuxR feedback protein has an influence on the system.
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <h2>June</h2>
| |
| − | <b>Week 5</b><br>
| |
| − | looked at the correlations of the different feedback in the system. To see which parameter has the biggest influence on the system and which parameters could be changed to create subpopulations. Fixed bugs in the system with help of Ronald.
| |
| − | <b>Week 6</b><br>
| |
| − | With changing the parameters with the biggest correlation different populations can be generated. The LuxR production rate is changed to do so. However, this does not correlate to reality yet. Subpopulations are simulated, but further research is needed to create a system that can be tested in the lab.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h1>July</h1>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 1</h2>
| |
| − | <p> went to iGEM meetup in Paris
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <h2>Week 3</h2>
| |
| − | <p>Expand the old quorum sensing model to 100.000 parameter sets. This needed to run onat the server because it took too long on a single computerthe computer could not handle it. Because the server did not save the work properly it needed to be done a few times. So it took a full week to get results.
| |
| − | <h2>Week 4</h2>
| |
| − | <p> make the subpopulation system, write the equations and try to get the best parameter sets by searching for a statistical method that does so. For the quorum sensing system.
| |
| − | look at the quorum sensing system with and without feedback.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h1>August</h1>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 1</h2>
| |
| − | <p>Test changes in highest parameter from the quorum sensing system to see if there is a change in GFP production. This is both done for the system with and without negative feedback.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 2</h2>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Set up the subpopulation system and run it with a few parameter sets. When it worked I changed the concentrations in Arabinose and Glucose in the system. Had some bugs with putting different arabinose and glucose concentrations in the system. Remco helped me solve this.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 3</h2>
| |
| − | <p>To set up a normal distribution for the quorum sensing part different methods are tried. fixing bugs when making the normal distributions. Plot the amount of GFP vs time. The subpopulation system ran on the server for a couple of days with 100.000 parameter sets. There is searched for the parameter set with the highest RFP, and also for the set with the lowest RFP.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 4</h2>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Parameter analysis with the best sets, got from the confidence interval. Put the models, quorum and subpopulations together. This did not work out the first time, but the second it did.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h1>September</h1>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 1</h2>
| |
| − | <p> plot normal distributions of the separate systems.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 2</h2>
| |
| − | <p> look for differences in production of GFP by tweaking the parameters.
| |
| − | Chose the best sets to work with for the combined system. Found four sets that can give the responses we want.</p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 3</h2>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | Calculate growth rate for the <i>e. coli</i> used by Thomas.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 4</h2>
| |
| − | <p> Tried the Event function in Matlab to generate oscillations in the system. This failed due to the fact that it could be only used for single cells and not for multi cell populations. We did not know that this was a limitation of the function.
| |
| − | Try to look at the effect of the total volume for a single cell and multicell, but the multicell was not possible.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h1>October</h1>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 1</h2>
| |
| − | <p> I got a code for generating oscillations from my supervisor, but it needed to be debugged. So I spended the week on doing this myself and together with my supervisor.
| |
| − | Make a heatmap for the subpopulation system about the ratio of lambda-cl and 434 compared to the RFP production.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
| − | <h2>Week 2</h2>
| |
| − | <p>
| |
| − | look at ratios lambda-cl and 434 to compare with the data Thomas got from the lab. He used a library for the promoter from the subpopulation system. Tried to simulate the combined model with total RFP.
| |
| − | </p>
| |
