Difference between revisions of "Team:ETH Zurich/Sensor Module"

Line 654: Line 654:
 
     <div class="sec white">
 
     <div class="sec white">
 
         <div>
 
         <div>
−
             <h3>RESULTS</h3>
+
             <h4>REQUIREMENTS</h4>
 
             <p>
 
             <p>
−
                high input, nice behavior.
+
              NO sensor sensitivity range = [100 uM - 100 mM]
 +
              Dynamic range : the system must be as fast as possible
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
−
        </div>
+
             <h5>KEY IDEA</h5>
−
    </div>
+
−
    <div class="sec white">
+
−
        <div>
+
−
             <h4>Stochastic simulation</h4>
+
 
             <p>
 
             <p>
−
                 always the output issue.
+
As before, we want to make the sensitivity range of the sensor and the activation range of the hybrid promoter match, so it propagates information relative to the
 +
inflammatory and candidate species to the switch and thus to the reporter. Under FACS and fluorescence distribution analysis the level of inflammation could
 +
then be inferred. ETH-Zurich previous team already worked on a Lactate sensor. Thus we  tried to improve their work and adapt the sensor sensitivity to our system.
 +
It appears that their system is too sensitive for our purpose. As a consequence we decided to add to the plasmid LldR which is constitutively produced and, by inactivating
 +
Lactate, artificially lower the concentration of active Lactate that would be able to bind the LLdR complex that inhibits gene transcription.
 +
            </p>
 +
            <h5>PARAMETERS OF INTEREST</h5>
 +
            <p>
 +
            <ul>
 +
                 <li>transcription rate of LldD</li>
 +
                <li>transcription rate of LldR</li>             
 +
                <li>Degradation rate of LldD</li>
 +
            </ul>
 +
            </p>
 +
            <p>
 +
            those parameters will allow us to set with the kinetic and the steady-state concentration of Lactate in the system. However in term of modularity,
 +
it turns out it is easier for the biologist to play with the constitutive promoters involved in LldR and LldD production.
 +
            </p>
 +
            <p>
 +
            <h5>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</h5>
 +
         
 +
            <h5>DOSE RESPONSE</h5>
 
             </p>
 
             </p>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>

Revision as of 10:41, 12 October 2016

PAVLOV'S COLI

SENSOR MODULE

INTRODUCTION:

Our idea was to recognize bowel infection and its possible cause based on the intestine level of Nitric Oxyde (NO) which is infection specific, and of Acyl Homoserine-Lactone (AHL) which is microbiota specific. Thus, the simultaneous presence of those two chemicals in an abnormal amount can de detected, and later associated.

Lactate is also a molecule of interest in IBD research : non only is it playing an important role in metabolism, but recent studies tend to show that it is present in high amount in certain cases of severe IBD.

Thus it turns out that two type of sensors are interesting to devellop in order to investigate the causes of IBD. The first AND Gate will be able to detect the presence of both AHL and NO, while the second one will detect Lactate and NO.

SENSOR MODULE

Figure 1:two alternative design for the sensor module

GOALS

  • Have an overall overview of the behavior and characteristic of our system
  • Discuss the specification of our model and see how the design may influence the equations and this the output behavior
  • Define the parameters that can be tuned and that can impact the output of our system so we can control our system range of working
  • Compare the different design
  • Infer the input state from the output signal analysis

Figure 1:NorR overview

Nitric Oxyde sensor

In the absence of NO, NorR is produced constitutively and binds repressively to the PnorV promoter, preventing gene transcription. When NO is present in the medium, it binds cooperatively to the hexameric form of NorR,and activate the promoter.

ASSUMPTION

We considered here that the binding of NO to NorR and PnorV_{i} does not affect the other species binding. Thus the reactions \begin{align*} NorR+NO&\rightleftharpoons NorR_{NO}\\ \end{align*} and \begin{align*} PnorV_{NorR}+NO&\rightleftharpoons NorR_{NO}\\ \end{align*} have the same reaction rate. Under those assumption, the system of equation can thus be simplified as follows:

REACTIONS

Reaction

NOrR SYSTEM:

\begin{align*} &\rightarrow NorR\\ NO+NorR&\rightleftharpoons NorR_{NO}\\ 2NorR_{NO}&\rightleftharpoons DNorR_{NO2}\\ 2NorR &\rightleftharpoons DNorR\\ DNorR+NO&\rightleftharpoons DNorR_{NO1}\\ DNorR_{NO1}+NO&\rightleftharpoons DNorR_{NO2}\\ DNorR_{NO2}+PnorV0&\rightleftharpoons PnorV1\\ DNorR_{NO2}+PnorV1&\rightleftharpoons PnorV2\\ DNorR_{NO2}+PnorV2&\rightleftharpoons PnorV3\\ PnorV3&\rightarrow mRNA_{Bxb1}\\ NorR&\rightarrow\\ DNorR&\rightarrow \\ DNorR_{NO1}&\rightarrow\\ DNorR_{NO2}&\rightarrow\\ NorR_{NO}&\rightarrow\\ mRNA_{Bxb1}&\rightarrow\\ \end{align*}
Species Description
NO Nitric Oxyde produced from DETA/NO reaction
NorR NorR constitutively produced insideE. coli cells
NorR NO NorR with No boundE. coli cells
DNorR Dimer of NorR , regulatory protein PnorV operon
DNorR NO1 Dimer with one NO bound to one of its site
DNorR NO2 Dimer two NO bound to it
PnorV i PnorV promoter with i sites occupied by DNoR NO2
PnorV 3 PnorV3 is the active promoter

RESULTS

The sensor module must be able to finely sense the different species, and in the rigth amount of concentrations. In this section we will explain how the model was used to provide useful insights for the biological system parameters.

REQUIREMENTS

NO sensor sensitivity range = [2 uM - 200 uM] Dynamic range : the system must be as fast as possible

KEY IDEA

We want to make the sensitivity range of the sensor and the activation range of the hybrid promoter match, so it propagates information relative to the inflammatory and candidate species to the switch and thus to the reporter. Under FACS and fluorescence distribution analysis the level of inflammation could then be inferred

PARAMETERS OF INTEREST

  • transcription rate of NorR
  • translation rate of NorR (RBS concentration)
  • Degradatioin rate of NorR

those parameters will allow us to set with the kinetic and the steady-state concentration of NorR in the system.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
DOSE RESPONSE

HEAT MAP

Figure 3:This simulation was run with an input concentration of NO of 2 uM. As explained before we would like to match the range of activation of the NO sensor module with the required dynamic range, in order to propagate through the genetic circuit all the information relative to the degree of activation of the sensor. Here, in order to avoid false negative results during the learning phase we would like an activation between 20% and 60% at the limit of detection. Which implies to keep a ratio between the degradation rate and the transcription rate (Kd) between 1.2 nM and 0.65 nM

Figure 4:This simulation was run with an input concentration of NO of 200 uM, the ideal upper limit of the sensor dynamic range. At this point we want a full activation of the sensor, which means at least a ratio of 0.8 activated promoter. Here it means a production rate superior to 2.5 nM min-1

This is the optimal limit of detection of our system. However, as we can see it is hard to adjust this limit of detection, As the system seems extremely stiff. As we can see for those concentration of NO, we already reach the full activation independently of the transcription rate. The behaviour of the sensor at 2uM or 200uM is similar. At first view, it seems that we can only choose between full activation for both those concentration (all-or-nothing behaviour), or a weak activation. Thus it does not seem possible to play with the tunable parameters to adjust the behaviour of the system on the range of interest. However, in order to get a deeper insight on the model, it will be interesting to look at a more detailed dose response simulation.

Figure 5:In order to more precisely tune our system, we wanted to look more into details into the dose reponse behaviour of the module. Providing the model with a range of different production rates, and degradation rtaes respecting the previously defined ratio constrain, we plot the dose response of the sensor.

DOSE RESPONSE

However, the output of the NO module is the number of PnorV promoter activated by the NO. This number, at a cell level is between 1 and 15, so noise may play an important role in the system behavior, that is why a stochastic simulation may, in case of low NO level, be interested in order to get deeper insight on the system response to NO.

HEAT MAP

Figure 6:Plotting the concentration corresponding to the maximum of the derivative of the previous dose response curve we compute the limit of detection of the system as a function of the transcription rate, assuming a degradation rate respecting the previous ratio constrain.

Figure 7:With regards to all te previous simulation it appears that a promoter strength of 3 nM for example is enough to see a 4 fold promoter activation under 200 uM of NO system stimulation. We wanted to determine which concentration of the NO species this promoter strength would represent. It appears that the NOrR concnetration remains quite low and similar to the concentration of native NorR in the E.Coli. In order to make the circuit as easy to implement as possible. It was suggested tu thus only use the native NorR naturally present in the cell. This would simplify the circuit to reducing the amount of sequence to inject inside the plasmids.

Figure 8: AHL Sensor overview

AHL SENSOR

In the absence of AHL, EsaR is constitutively produced, dimerizes and bind as a dimer to the esaBox situated downstream the promoter, preventing transcription as a roadblock. When a higher than normal amount of AHL is present in the gut, it binds to the EsaR dimer, and free the promoter, allowing transcription. Later on, several EsaBox can be added, in order to tune the sensor sensitivity.

ASSUMPTION

We assume a very fast dimerization of EsaR

REACTIONS

EsaR Hybrid Promoter System:

\begin{align*} &\rightarrow EsaR\\ 2 EsaR & \rightleftharpoons DEsaR\\ AHL+DEsaR &\rightleftharpoons DEsaR_{AHL1}\\ AHL+DEsaR_{AHL1}&\rightleftharpoons DEsaR_{AHL2}\\ Pesar1+AHL&\rightleftharpoons Pesar1_{AHL1}\\ Pesar1_{AHL1}+AHL&\rightleftharpoons Pfree +DEsaR_{AHL2}\\ Pfree &\rightarrow mRNA_{GFP}\\ EsaR&\rightarrow\\ DEsaR&\rightarrow \\ DEsaR_{AHL1}&\rightarrow\\ DEsaR_{AHL2}&\rightarrow\\ mRNA_{GFP} &\rightarrow\\ \end{align*}
Esar Reporter System:

\begin{align*} &\rightarrow EsaR\\ 2 EsaR & \rightleftharpoons DEsaR\\ AHL+DEsaR&\rightleftharpoons DEsaR_{AHL1}\\ AHL+DEsaR_{AHL1} & \rightleftharpoons DEsaR_{AHL2}\\ Pesar2+AHL&\rightleftharpoons Pesar2_{AHL1}\\ Pesar2_{AHL1}+AHL&\rightleftharpoons Pout+DEsaR_{AHL2}\\ Pout &\rightarrow mRNA_{GFP}\\ EsaR&\rightarrow \\ DEsaR&\rightarrow \\ DEsaR_{AHL1}&\rightarrow\\ DEsaR_{AHL2}&\rightarrow\\ mRNA_{GFP} &\rightarrow\\ \end{align*}
Species Description
AHL Acyl Homocerine Lactone introduced in the medium
EsaR EsaR constitutively produced insideE. coli cells
DEsaR Dimer of EsaR , regulatory protein binding to Esaboxes situated downstream the promoter
DEsaR AHL1 Dimer with one AHL bound to one of its site
DEsaR AHL2 Dimer with two AHL bound to one of its site
DNorR NO2 Dimer two NO bound to it
Pesar i Pesar1 correspond to the hybrid promoter. Pesar1 is the reporter promoter. They are independant
Pfree Pout respectively prmoter freed from the road block constituted by the EsaR bound to the downstream esaboxes

RESULTS

The sensor module must be able to finely sense the different species, and in the rigth amount of concentrations. In this section we will explain how the model was used to provide useful insights for the biological system parameters.

REQUIREMENTS

AHL sensor sensitivity range = [10 nM - 1 uM] Dynamic range : the system must be as fast as possible

KEY IDEA

We want to make the sensitivity range of the sensor and the activation range of the hybrid promoter match, so it propagates information relative to the inflammatory and candidate species to the switch and thus to the reporter. Under FACS and fluorescence distribution analysis the level of inflammation could then be inferred

PARAMETERS OF INTEREST

  • transcription rate of NorR
  • translation rate of NorR (RBS concentration)
  • Degradatioin rate of NorR

those parameters will allow us to set with the kinetic and the steady-state concentration of NorR in the system.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
HEAT MAP

Figure 9:The activation of the promoter was simulated under a constant AHL simulation of 100 nM with varying translation and transcription rates of Esar. As we can see it seems that they have similar impact on the circuit behaviour

As we can see on the graph below, translation and transcription have similar effect on promoter activation. Thus we decided to play with promoter strength rather than rbs level inside each cells. Later on we decided to only play with the promoter strength (transcription rate), as a entire collection of biobrick promoters is available, and thus spare to the lab to work on a rbs library in order to modify the cell translation rate.

Figure 10:We simulated the effect on the transcription and degradation rate on the AHL sensor promoter activity under 100 nM (ideal lower limit of detection) As before we want to match the detection and dynamic range of the sensor to propagate the level of inflammation through the genetic circuit. Here it implies that the ratio (Kd) must stay between 0.1 nM and 0.5 nM

Figure 11:The same analysis performed on the AHL sensor system with the ideal upper detection limit 1 uM diplays the heatmap above. To guarantee a activation superior to 90% at the input level, we need a Kd < 0.66 nM

DOSE RESPONSE

However the output is a amount of freed promoter at a cell level. As our cells only contain around 15 plasmid so stochastic modelling may be interesting.

Figure 12:The same dose response analysis was performed on the AHL sensor to finely tune our system in order to make it behave as ideally as possible. a range of different Esar production rate were tested on the circuit while simulated the dose response, assuming the ration constrained respected.

Figure 13: Lactate Sensor overview

LACTATE SENSOR

The promoter if flanked of two LldR specific binding sites : O1 and O2. In the absence of of lactate, LldR and LldD are constitutively produced. LldR then binds to O1 and O2 as a dimer, forms a DNA loop and preventing transcription. When Lactate (Lac) is present, it binds to the LldR complex and free the promoter. LldD lowers the concentration of Lactate inside the cell by catalyzing its transformation into pyruvate. The idea is to set a tunable treshold to the Lactate sensor, as this species, just like AHL, is anyway always present in the gut, and we only want to sense abnormal concentration.

ASSUMPTIONS

LldR exists as a dimer in solution. 2 molecules of lactate bind to one LldR dimer (L2). Lldr dimer bind to the two operator sites when no LldR is present. Lactate releases the binding of LldR dimer to the operators.

Reaction

Lactate system:

\begin{align*} &\rightarrow LldD\\ &\rightarrow LldR\\ LldD+Lac&\rightleftharpoons Pyr+LldD\\ 2LldR&\rightleftharpoons DLldR\\ DLldR+ G_on&\rightleftharpoons G_off\\ DLldR + Lac&\rightleftharpoons DLldR_{Lac1}\\ DLldR_{Lac1}+Lac&\rightleftharpoons DLldR_{Lac2}\\ G_off + Lac&\rightleftharpoons G_off_1\\ G_off_1 + Lac&\rightleftharpoons G_on + DLldR_{Lac2}\\ G_on&\rightleftharpoons mRNA_{GFP}\\ LldD&\rightarrow\\ LldR&\rightarrow\\ DLldR&\rightarrow\\ DLldR_{Lac1}&\rightarrow\\ DLldR_{Lac2}&\rightarrow\\ \end{align*}
Species Description
LldR regulatory protein of the Lac system, acts as a repressor
DLldR Dimer of LldR
Lac Lactate introduced in the medium. Forms a complex with LldR, preventing it from repressing the Promoter. Acts thus as an activatorE. coli cells
Pyr NO Pyruvate, inactive form of lactateE. coli cells
LldD Regulatory protein, catalyse the oxydation of Lactate into Pyruvate
G_on NO1 Active promoter
G_off NO2 Promoter repressed by LldR binding
G_off_1 NO2 Repressed promoter with 1 lactate molecule bound
DLldR_Lac1 i DLldR with one Lactate molecule bound NO2
DLldR_Lac2 3 DLldR with two Lactate molecule bound

REQUIREMENTS

NO sensor sensitivity range = [100 uM - 100 mM] Dynamic range : the system must be as fast as possible

KEY IDEA

As before, we want to make the sensitivity range of the sensor and the activation range of the hybrid promoter match, so it propagates information relative to the inflammatory and candidate species to the switch and thus to the reporter. Under FACS and fluorescence distribution analysis the level of inflammation could then be inferred. ETH-Zurich previous team already worked on a Lactate sensor. Thus we tried to improve their work and adapt the sensor sensitivity to our system. It appears that their system is too sensitive for our purpose. As a consequence we decided to add to the plasmid LldR which is constitutively produced and, by inactivating Lactate, artificially lower the concentration of active Lactate that would be able to bind the LLdR complex that inhibits gene transcription.

PARAMETERS OF INTEREST

  • transcription rate of LldD
  • transcription rate of LldR
  • Degradation rate of LldD

those parameters will allow us to set with the kinetic and the steady-state concentration of Lactate in the system. However in term of modularity, it turns out it is easier for the biologist to play with the constitutive promoters involved in LldR and LldD production.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
DOSE RESPONSE

Full AND Gate

Now it is time to link the two previous modules together in order to create the full AND Gate. Ideally, we would like to keep the model as modular as possible. In a first part, our way to proceed in order to recreate the hybrid promoter behavior from the two simple PnorV+Esabox promoter will be described. Then we propose a second model which takes into account all the different states of the promoter under NO and AHL/lactate binding, that can be stochastically simulated.

MODULAR MODEL

Figure 14:AND gate simulation using the modular model

FULL STATE MODEL

Figure 15:AND gate simulation using the full model

Full state model

-- inset image and equation --

modular model

-- inset image and equation --

DETERMINISTIC OVER STOCHASTIC MODEL

At the beginning of the project, we wanted to a model as precise as possible that would allow us to tune finely our system in order to get a response as close to the ideal one as possible. In addition, we also decided to go first for a full stochastic model. Thus FACS analysis and comparison as well as fitting would assure us a good parameter estimation. Moreover, we wished that looking at the reporter distribution would help us to get some additional information about the input of the circuit. As the system is thought as a detector, and its application (travelling through the gut which is seen as a black box to get activated eventually by the presence of both NO and specific AHL) is to express a reporter, we wished that by simply looking at he distribution of mean and variance of the reporter could give us enough information in order to reconstitute the input. Thus in a medical application, a simple FACS analysis of the remaining E.Coli harvesting from the faeces, would be enough to determine the acuteness of the inflammation and a quantitative data on the microbiota disbalance. However, it appeared after several staochastic simulation that the fluctuation of the ratio of activated promoter, for one trajectory, was to fast to have any influence of the reporter protein expression, as binding and unbinding of protein and ligand to and from DNA strand are quick reaction compared to mRNA and protein production and folding. As shown on the graph below. Thus we decided to go for simple deterministic simulation for the AND gate characterization.

Figure 16:We compare the behavior of the model under deterministic and stochastic simulations. As we can see the mean behavior remains similar. The fluctuations around the mean value due to the stochasticity can be neglected at a promoter scale because protein-ligand binding-unbinding reaction is extremely fast compare to protein/mRNA production and folding. Thus choosing a deterministic approach here does not represent a loss of information neither for the kinetic nor for the concentration at steady state.

Thanks to the sponsors that supported our project: