Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Engagement"

Line 244: Line 244:
 
                 html+="<br><br>";
 
                 html+="<br><br>";
 
                 html += "          <img src=\"http:\/\/2016.igem.org\/wiki\/images\/7\/71\/T--Bordeaux--AP2_DomAndAl.jpeg\" ";
 
                 html += "          <img src=\"http:\/\/2016.igem.org\/wiki\/images\/7\/71\/T--Bordeaux--AP2_DomAndAl.jpeg\" ";
                 html += "                  style=\"display:block ; margin-left: auto ; margin-right: auto ; width:50% ; height:auto\" ";
+
                 html += "                  style=\"display:block ; margin-left: auto ; margin-right: auto ; width:60% ; height:auto\" ";
 
                 html += "                  id=\"RolinAndGirard\" title=\"The discussion\">";
 
                 html += "                  id=\"RolinAndGirard\" title=\"The discussion\">";
 
                 html += "                  <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Mr <b>Dominique Rolin and Alain Girard<\/b> beginning the discussion with the audience<\/i><\/p>";
 
                 html += "                  <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Mr <b>Dominique Rolin and Alain Girard<\/b> beginning the discussion with the audience<\/i><\/p>";
Line 263: Line 263:
 
                 html += "                    <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Mr <b>Arthur Rafie<\/b>, head of the association <b>Ca cogite<\/b>, talking about Youtube<\/i><\/p>";
 
                 html += "                    <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Mr <b>Arthur Rafie<\/b>, head of the association <b>Ca cogite<\/b>, talking about Youtube<\/i><\/p>";
 
                 html += "<br><br>";
 
                 html += "<br><br>";
                 html += "            <img src=\"http:\/\/2016.igem.org\/wiki\/images\/8\/8b\/T--Bordeaux--Tempory.jpeg\" ";
+
                 html += "            <img src=\"http:\/\/2016.igem.org\/wiki\/images\/a\/a8\/T--Bordeaux--AP2_Question.jpeg" ";
                 html += "                    style=\"display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;width:40% ; height:auto\" ";
+
                 html += "                    style=\"display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;width:60% ; height:auto\" ";
                 html += "                    id=\"Buffet2\" title=\"Time to eat\">";
+
                 html += "                    id=\"Buffet2\" title=\"Question\">";
                 html += "                    <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Time for our guests to eat<\/i><\/p>";
+
                 html += "                    <p style=\"text-align:center\"><i>Question time for the audience<\/i><\/p>";
 
                 html += "          <\/div>";
 
                 html += "          <\/div>";
 
                 html += "";
 
                 html += "";
 +
                html +="            <div class=\"column full_size\">";
 
                 html += "          <p align=\"justify\">After this last presentation, <b>Dominique Rolin<\/b>, head of the functional Genomics Center of Bordeaux and <b>Alain Girard<\/b>, in charge of the communication in the National Institute of Research in Agronomy gave their personal opinions on how science can be indeed distorted by the media because of different reasons. Mr Rolin asked everyone present what medium they use to inform themselves about science and what their opinion is on them. Different students participated in the discussion and one student suggested the idea of having a class about this subject added to the University curriculum. When the discussion came to the reliability of public science on YouTube,  many students agreed on the opinion that as long as we have the possibility to read the sources the youtubers use and contact them or publish any false information they may have spread, it rests a very useful medium for spreading and discussing science. <br><br>";
 
                 html += "          <p align=\"justify\">After this last presentation, <b>Dominique Rolin<\/b>, head of the functional Genomics Center of Bordeaux and <b>Alain Girard<\/b>, in charge of the communication in the National Institute of Research in Agronomy gave their personal opinions on how science can be indeed distorted by the media because of different reasons. Mr Rolin asked everyone present what medium they use to inform themselves about science and what their opinion is on them. Different students participated in the discussion and one student suggested the idea of having a class about this subject added to the University curriculum. When the discussion came to the reliability of public science on YouTube,  many students agreed on the opinion that as long as we have the possibility to read the sources the youtubers use and contact them or publish any false information they may have spread, it rests a very useful medium for spreading and discussing science. <br><br>";
 
                 html += "            Finally, the public was invited to our lovely buffet prepared by some members of our team. This allowed everyone to further discuss on the subject of the conference while making new friends. And they can answer to our second survey concerning Sleep disorders, their causes and the potential therapies.<\/p>";
 
                 html += "            Finally, the public was invited to our lovely buffet prepared by some members of our team. This allowed everyone to further discuss on the subject of the conference while making new friends. And they can answer to our second survey concerning Sleep disorders, their causes and the potential therapies.<\/p>";

Revision as of 23:01, 12 October 2016

Sleep with EpiC elegans

The meeting between People, Science and Food!

"Apéro Science" which means Science Aperitif in French is a series of events organized by our team in collaboration with M. Marc CHEVALIER, assignment manager of Talence innovation Sud Développement. The first event was held on May, 26th at the Forum des Arts et de la Culture in Talence and the second one was held on October, 6th at the Bordeaux University. For an hour, professionals made a presentation about a chosen topic in order to explain it to a large public (60 persons for the first, 100 for the second). After their presentation, the audience could have a discussion with them in order to make their questions. Following the debate, everyone was invited to an aperitif prepared by the team!

These events were organized with the intention of familiarizing more and more people with the scientific popularization. The team worked hard in order to invite students and people from non-scientific fields and professionals of the concerning fields. We found it extremely interesting discussing with all these people and sharing with them our knowledge in order to open their minds but also open a little bit more ours!

This year, we focused on two insteresting topics which are:

Change your mind on GMOs!

Most of the time, when we talk about GMOs what comes to people's minds are the modified plants used by the food industry. Associating them uniquely to this use, many people think that GMOs are a great danger for the society. However, GMOs may also save lives when we use them to find new therapies for diseases.
Our first Apéro Science had as a goal to explain to our audience what GMOs are and which existing GMOs are used in the different fields. Our objective wasn't to convince them to be for or against GMOs but to inform them on this topic and make them consider more this complex question.

Science and Media

In the industry and research fields, researchers have to be conscious of the latest scientific innovations and discoveries. Thanks to the scientific media, they may know about the advances of their colleagues in the whole world. But outside these areas, information is often obscured or sometimes distorted or false. How do the general media see and explain the Science?
For our second Apéro Science, we organized round tables with different professionals (journalists, researchers, scientific mediators, and others ...) in order to have our questions answered.

Click on the pictures to discover the summary of our two "Apéro Science" !