Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Human Practices/MaterialsPrognosis"
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<p><b>We invite every Team to pick up our research and continue it for the human practice part next year. Ideally, we can get results that can be compared internationally in the future, which we can use to analyze and compare attitudes towards our research. If the questionnaire is changed to a quantitative one, comparing the politicians positions in different societies would be even easier.</b></p> | <p><b>We invite every Team to pick up our research and continue it for the human practice part next year. Ideally, we can get results that can be compared internationally in the future, which we can use to analyze and compare attitudes towards our research. If the questionnaire is changed to a quantitative one, comparing the politicians positions in different societies would be even easier.</b></p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Human_Practices"><button class="einstein_rosen_bridge" style="margin-right:20px;">Human Practices →</button></a> | ||
| + | <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Human_Practices/Politicians"><button class="einstein_rosen_bridge">Politicians →</button></a> | ||
<div class="content"> | <div class="content"> | ||
<p><h5>Material</h5></p> | <p><h5>Material</h5></p> | ||
<p>Here you can assess our questionnaire. Of course you have to replace “Germany” by your country/state. It needs to be mentioned that the question “Do you think, your party would sponsor projects, just as ours“ did not work out the way we planned it. The politicians thought we asked for funding even though we just wanted their political support. As such, the question needs to be rephrased. Another possibility is to change the questionnaire to be a quantitative one. In this case it has to be noted that the interviewees belong to a certain party, but it can still be adopted with slight changes in content.</p><br> | <p>Here you can assess our questionnaire. Of course you have to replace “Germany” by your country/state. It needs to be mentioned that the question “Do you think, your party would sponsor projects, just as ours“ did not work out the way we planned it. The politicians thought we asked for funding even though we just wanted their political support. As such, the question needs to be rephrased. Another possibility is to change the questionnaire to be a quantitative one. In this case it has to be noted that the interviewees belong to a certain party, but it can still be adopted with slight changes in content.</p><br> | ||
| − | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/ | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/f6/T--TU_Darmstadt--questionnaire.pdf">Download <b>QUESTIONNAIRE</b></a><br> |
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d2/T--TU_Darmstadt--Fragenbogen_deutsch.pdf">Download <b>ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE IN GERMAN</b></a><br><br> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d2/T--TU_Darmstadt--Fragenbogen_deutsch.pdf">Download <b>ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE IN GERMAN</b></a><br><br> | ||
<p>Additionally we provide a guideline for you to make the scheduling of the interviews easier.</p><br> | <p>Additionally we provide a guideline for you to make the scheduling of the interviews easier.</p><br> | ||
| − | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/cf/T--TU_Darmstadt--guideline.pdf">Download <b>GUIDELINE</b></a> | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
<div class="highlights"> | <div class="highlights"> | ||
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Human_Practices/Politicians">Politicians</a><br/> | <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Human_Practices/Politicians">Politicians</a><br/> | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<a href="#mainHeader"><button class="back_top_full">Back to the Top</button></a> | <a href="#mainHeader"><button class="back_top_full">Back to the Top</button></a> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:41, 19 October 2016
MATERIALS and PROGNOSIS
We invite every Team to pick up our research and continue it for the human practice part next year. Ideally, we can get results that can be compared internationally in the future, which we can use to analyze and compare attitudes towards our research. If the questionnaire is changed to a quantitative one, comparing the politicians positions in different societies would be even easier.
Material
Here you can assess our questionnaire. Of course you have to replace “Germany” by your country/state. It needs to be mentioned that the question “Do you think, your party would sponsor projects, just as ours“ did not work out the way we planned it. The politicians thought we asked for funding even though we just wanted their political support. As such, the question needs to be rephrased. Another possibility is to change the questionnaire to be a quantitative one. In this case it has to be noted that the interviewees belong to a certain party, but it can still be adopted with slight changes in content.
Download QUESTIONNAIRE
Download ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE IN GERMAN
Additionally we provide a guideline for you to make the scheduling of the interviews easier.
Download GUIDELINE
