|
|
(26 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | | |
| <p>The biological realization of CryptoGErM consisted of four | | <p>The biological realization of CryptoGErM consisted of four |
− | subprojects: integration,characterization, decoy and key deletion.</p> | + | subprojects: integration, characterization, key hiding and key |
| + | deletion. The encrypted message and the key were integrated into |
| + | the genome of <em>B. subtilis</em>. The location in the genomic DNA |
| + | makes it harder to retrieve the data, since whole genome sequencing |
| + | is required. The message is protected by a digital lock: the key, |
| + | and thus doesn’t need further biological protection. The key is not |
| + | encrypted and has to be protected by a biological lock. We followed |
| + | different approaches to design a multi-layered biological lock. We |
| + | followed two main ideas, namely hiding the key and deleting the key |
| + | when unauthorized parties handle it. This system is highly flexible |
| + | and biological layers can easily be added or modified to the wishes |
| + | of the user. An overview of all the protocols and plasmid construction can be found in the <a href="/Team:Groningen/Labjournal">Lab journal</a>.</p> |
| | | |
| <div class="split"> | | <div class="split"> |
Line 23: |
Line 34: |
| there we integrated it in the genome of <em>B. subtilis</em> 168 trp+. For | | there we integrated it in the genome of <em>B. subtilis</em> 168 trp+. For |
| message and key transmission these <em>B. subtilis</em> strains were | | message and key transmission these <em>B. subtilis</em> strains were |
− | sporulated. </p> | + | sporulated. We were able to successfully retrieve and read out our message. </p> |
| | | |
− | <p>The location in the genomic DNA makes it harder to retrieve the | + | <p><ul> |
− | data, since whole genome sequencing is required. The message is
| + | <li><a href="/Team:Groningen/Proof">Read more about the integration and our proof of concept.</a></li> |
− | protected by a digital lock: the key, and thus doesn’t need further
| + | </ul></p> |
− | biological protection. </p>
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | <p>The key is not encrypted and has to be protected by a biological | + | |
− | lock. We followed different approaches to design a multi-layered
| + | |
− | biological lock.</p>
| + | |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div class="right flone"> | | <div class="right flone"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/40/T--Groningen--layersguy.png" /> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/a1/T--Groningen--Bacillus-couple.png" /> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| | | |
− | <p>We followed two main ideas, namely hiding the key and deleting
| + | <div class="split"> |
− | the key when unauthorized parties handle it.</p> | + | <div class="right fltwo"> |
− |
| + | <h2>Characterization</h2> |
− |
| + | |
− | <div class="split"> | + | <p>The integration vector from team LMU Munich |
− | <div class="right flone"> | + | BacillusBiobrickbox 2012 (<a |
− | <h2>Characterization</h2> | + | href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) |
− | | + | can be used to integrate an insert into the amyE locus of |
− | <p>The integration vector from team LMU Munich BacillusBiobrickbox 2012 (BBa_K823023)
| + | <em>B. subtilis</em>. In order to be able to efficiently |
− | can be used to integrate an insert into the amyE locus of B. subtilis. In order to | + | use this integration vector we characterized BBa_K823023 by |
− | be able to efficiently use this integration vector we characterized BBa_K823023 by determining its | + | determining its transformation efficiency. This helped us |
− | transformation efficiency. This helped us in our project and will hopefully help future iGEM teams aswell. | + | in our project and will hopefully help future iGEM teams as |
− | Read more about how we determined the transformation efficiency.</p>
| + | well. </p> |
| | | |
− | | + | <p><ul> |
− | </div> | + | <li><a href="/Team:Groningen/BrickCharacter">Read more about how we determined the transformation efficiency..</a></ul></li> |
| + | </p></ul> |
| + | </div> |
| <div class="left flone"> | | <div class="left flone"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/40/T--Groningen--layersguy.png" /> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/86/T--Groningen--TransformEffK8-4.jpg" /> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | |
| + | <div class="split"> |
| + | <div class="left fltwo"> |
| + | <h2>Key hiding</h2> |
| | | |
− | </div> | + | <h4>Decoy</h4> |
− | <div class="split">
| + | |
− | <div class="left flone">
| + | |
− | <h2>Key hiding</h2>
| + | |
| | | |
− | <h4>MIC and MBC values of ciprofloxacin</h4>
| + | <p>Hiding the key became called the <em>decoy</em> |
− | <p>We determined the MIC and MBC of ciprofloxacin on wild-type Bacillus subtilis 168 as well as the MIC of E. coli Top 10
| + | approach.The key-containing spore will be send in a mixture |
− | and B. subtilis 168 carrying the qnrS1 ciprofloxacin resistance gene. We could observe a significant
| + | of different decoy spores. The recipient has to be aware of |
− | improvement in antibiotic tolerance when compared to the MIC values of the wild-type
| + | the special treatment that is required to select the |
− | strains Additionally we obtained a B. subtilis 168 isolate by directed evolution which is even more resistant to ciprofloxacin.
| + | correct spores from the decoy. We have been working on a |
− | Read more about the MIC and MBC experiments.</p>
| + | photoswitchable ciprofloxacin compound. </p> |
| | | |
| + | <p>Only the knowledge about the right wavelength allows the |
| + | recipient to activate the added ciprofloxacin and thus |
| + | start selection of the right spore strain.</p> |
| | | |
− | <h4>Decoy</h4> | + | <p>Our design of the decoy approach included the biobricks |
− | | + | for ciprofloxacin resistance, a superfolder GFP and a pATP |
− |
| + | promotor.</p> |
− | <p>Hiding the key became called the <em>decoy</em> approach.The
| + | |
− | key-containing spore will be send in a mixture of different decoy
| + | <p><ul> |
− | spores. The recipient has to be aware of the special treatment that
| + | <li><a href="/Team:Groningen/Decoy">Read more about the decoy experiment.</a></ul></li> |
− | is required to select the correct spores from the decoy. We have
| + | </u></p> |
− | been working on a photoswitchable ciprofloxacin compound. </p>
| + | </div> |
− | | + | |
− | <p>Only the knowledge about the right wavelength allows the
| + | |
− | recipient to activate the added ciprofloxacin and thus start
| + | |
− | selection of the right spore strain.</p>
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | <p>Our design of the decoy approach included the biobricks for
| + | |
− | ciprofloxacin resistance, a superfolder GFP and a pATP promotor.</p>
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | | + | |
− | </div> | + | |
| <div class="right flone"> | | <div class="right flone"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/40/T--Groningen--layersguy.png" /> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d3/T--Groningen--Decoy-4_2.jpg" /> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | <div class="split"> |
| + | <div class="left fltwo"> |
| + | <h4>MIC and MBC values of ciprofloxacin</h4> |
| + | |
| + | <p>We determined the MIC and MBC of ciprofloxacin on |
| + | wild-type <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> 168 as well as the MIC |
| + | of <em>E. coli</em> Top 10 and <em>B. subtilis</em> 168 |
| + | carrying the <em>qnrS1</em> ciprofloxacin resistance gene. |
| + | We could observe a significant improvement in antibiotic |
| + | tolerance when compared to the MIC values of the wild-type |
| + | strains. Additionally we obtained a <em>B. subtilis</em> |
| + | 168 isolate by directed evolution which is even more |
| + | resistant to ciprofloxacin. </p> |
| + | |
| + | <small>Our time-lapse video to the right shows germination of <em>B. subtilis</em></small> |
| | | |
− | | + | <p><ul> |
− | </div> | + | <li><a href="/Team:Groningen/PhotoswitchableAntibiotics">Read more about the MIC and MBC experiments..</a></ul></li> |
− | <div class="split"> | + | </ul></p> |
| + | </div> |
| <div class="right flone"> | | <div class="right flone"> |
− | <h2>Key deletion</h2> | + | <video controls preload="metadata"> |
| + | <source src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/11/T--Groningen--Spore-Movie.mp4" /> |
| + | </video> |
| + | </div> |
| + | </div> |
| + | |
| + | <div class="split"> |
| + | <div class="right fltwo"> |
| + | <h2>Key deletion</h2> |
| | | |
− | <h4>NucA key deletion</h4> | + | <h4>NucA key deletion</h4> |
| | | |
− | <p>Another biological security layer is provided by our <em>key
| + | <p>Another biological security layer is provided by our key |
− | deletion system</em>. We have been working on two different approaches.
| + | deletion system. This assures that only authorized parties |
− | The first is a nucA killswitch which is made out of an assembly of
| + | can access the key. We have been working on two different |
− | different biobricks. Atc or tetracycline have to be added to
| + | approaches. The first is a nucA killswitch which is made |
− | inhibit the tetR promoter to stop the expression of the nucA and
| + | out of an assembly of different BioBricks. ATc or |
− | digestion of the key sequence.</p>
| + | tetracycline have to be added to inhibit the tetR promoter |
| + | to stop the expression of the nucA and digestion of the key |
| + | sequence.</p> |
| | | |
− | | + | <h4>CRISPR/Cas9 key deletion</h4> |
− | <h4>CRISPR/Cas9 key deletion</h4> | + | |
| | | |
− | <p>The second approach makes use of a CRISPRcas system which will
| + | <p>The second approach makes use of a CRISPR/Cas9 system |
− | delete the key from the genome if no special treatment is applied.
| + | which will delete the key from the genome if no special |
− | Addition of Atc or tetracycline will stop the cas9 expression.</p>
| + | treatment is applied. Addition of aTc or tetracycline will |
− | | + | stop the Cas9 expression.</p> |
| | | |
− | </div> | + | <p><ul> |
| + | <li><a href="/Team:Groningen/KeyDeletion">Read more about the key deletion.</a></ul></li> |
| + | </ul></p> |
| + | </div> |
| <div class="left flone"> | | <div class="left flone"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/40/T--Groningen--layersguy.png" /> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4f/T-Groningen-nucA-in-pSB1C3-plate2.jpg" /> |
| </div> | | </div> |
− | | + | </div> |
− | </div> | + | |
− | <p> </p>
| + | |
− | <h2></h2>
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | <p>This system is highly flexible and biological layers can easily
| + | |
− | be added or modified to the wishes of the user.</p>
| + | |
| </section> | | </section> |
| </article> | | </article> |
| </html> | | </html> |
| {{Groningen/footer}} | | {{Groningen/footer}} |