Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<div class="col-lg-12"> | <div class="col-lg-12"> | ||
<h1 align="center"> Applied Design</h1> | <h1 align="center"> Applied Design</h1> | ||
− | <p> Given that our system has been proved to | + | <p> Given that our integrative system has been proved to produce hydrogen with great stability and repeatability and its intrinsic characteristics for scalable production, we think our project is a successful applied design. Here, we summarize the qualification and merits of our design in the following figure. In addition, biofilm-interfaced Nanorods has the potential for easy recycling and is cheap for production, thus presenting an innovative and interesting example towards industrial-oriented artificial photosynthesis system. </p> |
<center> | <center> | ||
<img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/10/T--ShanghaitechChina--AP.pdf" width="80%"> | <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/10/T--ShanghaitechChina--AP.pdf" width="80%"> | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<p id="A Functional Applied Design"></p> | <p id="A Functional Applied Design"></p> | ||
<div class="col-lg-12"> <center> <h1 >A Functional Applied Design</h1></center> | <div class="col-lg-12"> <center> <h1 >A Functional Applied Design</h1></center> | ||
− | <h2> | + | <h2> Methods </h2> |
The biofilm, whose subunit was CsgA engineered with HisTag on N-termial and SpyCachter-HisTag on C-terminal, was grown on microspheres, 25 micrometers in diameter for 48 hours. NR’s (7.72*10^-9 M) were then added and given 30 min to bind to the HisTag on CsgA subunit. (The engineered SpyCatcher was used for possible pure hydrogenase binding, our alternative proposal.) The solution was centrifuged and the sediments contained biofilm beads covered with NR. This sediment was resuspended in PBS and was added to the reaction solution consisting of <em>E. coli</em> with engineered hydrogenase (wet weight 100ug) resuspended in PBS, 150Mm NaCl, 100mM VitaminC, and mediator solution (5mM Paraquat dichloride, for mediating the electrons across the cell membrane). The whole solution including bacteria is adjusted to pH=4 by 100mM Tris-HCl(pH=7.0), given that the pH of 4 was reported to be an optimal environment. [1]<span style=”font-size:12px”> </span> Prior to the assay, the <em>E. coli</em> was induced with IPTG overnight at room temperature. | The biofilm, whose subunit was CsgA engineered with HisTag on N-termial and SpyCachter-HisTag on C-terminal, was grown on microspheres, 25 micrometers in diameter for 48 hours. NR’s (7.72*10^-9 M) were then added and given 30 min to bind to the HisTag on CsgA subunit. (The engineered SpyCatcher was used for possible pure hydrogenase binding, our alternative proposal.) The solution was centrifuged and the sediments contained biofilm beads covered with NR. This sediment was resuspended in PBS and was added to the reaction solution consisting of <em>E. coli</em> with engineered hydrogenase (wet weight 100ug) resuspended in PBS, 150Mm NaCl, 100mM VitaminC, and mediator solution (5mM Paraquat dichloride, for mediating the electrons across the cell membrane). The whole solution including bacteria is adjusted to pH=4 by 100mM Tris-HCl(pH=7.0), given that the pH of 4 was reported to be an optimal environment. [1]<span style=”font-size:12px”> </span> Prior to the assay, the <em>E. coli</em> was induced with IPTG overnight at room temperature. | ||
− | + | In the activity assay of the hydrogenase in producing hydrogen, the system goes through three periods of “light-on and light-off”. The result (see below) shows the stability of the system and the reversible catalytic activity of the hydrogenase of the reaction, 2H+ + 2e- ⇿ H2 .<p></p> | |
<h2> Instrument</h2> | <h2> Instrument</h2> | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
− | <h2> | + | <h2> Results </h2> |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4f/T--ShanghaitechChina--asasy-withfinalplan-bidirectlycat.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4f/T--ShanghaitechChina--asasy-withfinalplan-bidirectlycat.png"></center> | ||
<p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 2</b> Hydrogen evolution curve with nanorods bound to biofilm beads.</p> | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 2</b> Hydrogen evolution curve with nanorods bound to biofilm beads.</p> | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
<b> Calculating the hydrogen evolution rate of our integrated system.</b><p></p> | <b> Calculating the hydrogen evolution rate of our integrated system.</b><p></p> | ||
− | We | + | We calculated the hydrogen production efficiency using the standard curve. Specifically, we chose the data from the first hydrogen production period. We converted the data in mV into umol/L. We compared the efficiency of our system with previous work ( See reference 1.) . |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/30/T--ShanghaitechChina--biaozhuanqingqibiaodingquxian.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/30/T--ShanghaitechChina--biaozhuanqingqibiaodingquxian.png"></center> | ||
<p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure Standard</b> Relationship between voltage data and concentration.</p> | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure Standard</b> Relationship between voltage data and concentration.</p> | ||
− | + | Following the method above , we obtain the rate of hydrogen evolution: the tip of the first period is 7.061 mV at 500s. This corresponds to 2.179 (0.3086*7.061) umol/L at 500s. Thus the rate is 0.0126 (2.179/500*3mL*1000) umol/s, for 0.1g E. Coli. In comparison with the rate from reference 1, 0.0086mol umol/s. This 46% increase in the efficiency shows that our system not only functions, but is also a big improvement compared with a artificial hydrogen production system reported before .<p></p> | |
</div></div></div> | </div></div></div> | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-lg-12" > | <div class="col-lg-12" > | ||
− | <h1 align="center" >Potential use for wider | + | <h1 align="center" >Potential use for wider applications</h1> |
<b> Our biofilm system included a SpyCatcher system which has the potential for working directly with enzymes on biofilm. This design was not utilized in our hydrogen production so far, but it offers a gate for enzymes to directly react with nanomaterials since the CsgA subunit is engineered with both the Histag and SpyCatcher. This potential use might lead to a boost in efficiency in some nanomaterial-enzymes combinations. The reasoning of the design, and the proof of the functional design is shown below. </b><p></p> | <b> Our biofilm system included a SpyCatcher system which has the potential for working directly with enzymes on biofilm. This design was not utilized in our hydrogen production so far, but it offers a gate for enzymes to directly react with nanomaterials since the CsgA subunit is engineered with both the Histag and SpyCatcher. This potential use might lead to a boost in efficiency in some nanomaterial-enzymes combinations. The reasoning of the design, and the proof of the functional design is shown below. </b><p></p> | ||
<div class="col-lg-12"> | <div class="col-lg-12"> | ||
<h3 class="bg" >SpyTag and SpyCatcher [2]</h3> | <h3 class="bg" >SpyTag and SpyCatcher [2]</h3> | ||
<h4><b>Introduction and Motivation: SpySystem</b></h4> | <h4><b>Introduction and Motivation: SpySystem</b></h4> | ||
− | We want to attach | + | We want to attach enzymes to biofilm, so we turn to a widely applied linkage system, SpyTag and SpyCatcher.<p></p> |
<center> | <center> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c5/Shanghaitechchina_spy1.png" style="width:50%;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c5/Shanghaitechchina_spy1.png" style="width:50%;"> | ||
Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
<div class="col-lg-12" > | <div class="col-lg-12" > | ||
<h1 align="center" >Conclusion</h1> | <h1 align="center" >Conclusion</h1> | ||
− | In conclusion, E. Coli strains expressing biofilm on microspheres to anchor nanorods and strains expressing hydrogenase work great together for producing hydrogen. The system achieved a fairly good hydrogen production rate compared to | + | In conclusion, E. Coli strains expressing biofilm on microspheres to anchor nanorods and strains expressing hydrogenase work great together for producing hydrogen. The system achieved a fairly good hydrogen production rate compared to a work reported this year, a nearly 50% increase. The intrinsic adherence of biofilms towards various interfaces allows us to grow biofilms on easy-separation micro-beads, therefore facilitating recyclable usage of the biofilm-anchored NRs and endowing this whole system with recyclability. Notably, our hydrogen production has shown great stability compared to previous reports using hydrogenase. Practically speaking, the system comprising E. Coli and biofilms are both amenable for scalable operation, rendering itself a great potential for large-scale industrial applications. Such system can also be adapted to other energy-oriented applications by utilizing engineered new strains with a diverse spectrum of enzymes or metabolic pathways. In addition, our SpyCatcher on the CsgA allows the binding of other proteins that may significantly improve our system. The demonstrated efficiency and stability, along with great potential in scalability, recyclability and versatility makes our system an innovative engineering design with potential for industrial application. |
Revision as of 19:45, 19 October 2016