Difference between revisions of "Team:ETH Zurich/Model"

Line 5: Line 5:
 
     <body>
 
     <body>
 
         <ul class="menu" id="outline">
 
         <ul class="menu" id="outline">
             <li class="outline_item"><a href="#overview">Overview</a></li><!--
+
             <li class="outline_title">MODEL</li><!--
 +
        --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#overview">Overview</a></li><!--
 
         --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#contributions">Contributions</a></li><!--
 
         --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#contributions">Contributions</a></li><!--
 +
        --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#results">Results</a></li><!--
 +
        --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#structure">Structure</a></li><!--
 +
        --><li class="outline_item"><a href="#references">References</a></li><!--
 
         -->
 
         -->
 
         </ul>
 
         </ul>
Line 17: Line 21:
 
             <div>
 
             <div>
 
                 <h2>OVERVIEW</h2>
 
                 <h2>OVERVIEW</h2>
                 <p>Due to the complex design of our system, an intuitive design of the system would is not sufficient. Several components must be tuned specifically for our application, and the correct functioning of the candidate designs is not obvious. We developed a hybrid deterministic-stochastic model of our system covering the known mechanics of the components we use. The main goals include a model-based design of the system, tuning of the system components for our application and prediction of the system behavior.</p>
+
                 <p>Due to the complexity of our system, an intuitive design would not be sufficient. Several components must be tuned specifically for our application, and the correct functioning of the candidate designs is not obvious. We developed a hybrid deterministic-stochastic model of our system covering the known mechanics of the components we use. The main goals include a model-based design of the system, tuning of the system components for our application and prediction of the system behavior.</p>
                 <p>The stochastic approach of our model allows us to exploit the intrinsic noise at our advantage: our model describes the <it>distribution</it> of the population's behavoir, which is much more informative than the average. We can thus interpret quantitative output of the system with greater accuracy.</p>
+
                 <p>The stochastic approach of our model allows us to exploit the intrinsic noise at our advantage: our model describes the <it>distribution</it> of the population's behavoir, which is much more informative than the average. We can thus interpret quantitative outputs of the system with greater accuracy.</p>
 
                 <p>The model matches the modular sructure of the system, making easier to exchange components and test their behavior in the full system. Thanks to this feature we were able to quickly integrate and tune alternative parts like the lactate sensor and the CRISPR switch.</p>
 
                 <p>The model matches the modular sructure of the system, making easier to exchange components and test their behavior in the full system. Thanks to this feature we were able to quickly integrate and tune alternative parts like the lactate sensor and the CRISPR switch.</p>
                 <p>The parameters of the model are strictly based on literature or experimental characterization of the single components. The estiamtion of the parameters uses INSIGHT, a recent method based on <i>Approximate Bayesian Computation</i> (ABC) and flow cytomerty data.</p>
+
                 <p>The parameters of the model are strictly based on literature or experimental characterization of the single components. The estiamtion of the parameters uses INSIGHT, a recent method based on <i>Approximate Bayesian Computation</i> (ABC) and flow cytomerty data.<sup><a href="#cit1" class="cit">1</a></sup></p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
Line 46: Line 50:
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <div class="sec white">
+
         <div class="sec white" id="results">
 
             <div>
 
             <div>
                 <h2>MODEL STRUCTURE</h2>
+
                 <h2>MAIN RESULTS</h2>
 +
                <h3>EARLY DESIGN INSIGHTS</h3>
 +
                <h3>SYSTEM TUNING</h3>
 +
                <p>Bottom-up tuning. 1) Reporters, 2) Switch, 3) Sensors</p>
 +
                <h3>SYSTEM SIMULATION</h3>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <div class="sec light_grey">
+
         <div class="sec light_grey" id="structure">
 
             <div>
 
             <div>
                 <h2>MODELING TECHNIQUES</h2>
+
                 <h2>MODEL STRUCTURE</h2>
 +
                <p>For simplicity and modularity the model is divided in three parts. Those modules are designed to be easily interchangeable. Although here the model is explained in the context of IBD investigation, its structure is general enough to be employed in other associative learning applications.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <div class="image_box full_size">
 +
                    <a href="https://2016.igem.org/File:T--ETH_Zurich--model_structure.svg">
 +
                        <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/44/T--ETH_Zurich--model_structure.svg">
 +
                    </a>
 +
                    <p><b>Figure 1:</b> Schematic view of the model structure.</p>
 +
                </div>
 +
 
 +
                <p><i>Figure 1</i> shows a schematic view of the model structure. In order to maximize flexibility we choosed promoter activities as interfaces between modules. Since we tune the system in a bottom-up fashion we explicitely avoided backward dependencies.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <h3>SENSOR MODULE</h3>
 +
                <p>The sensor module is composed by an AND gate for the association of the desired events and a regulated promoter for the induction of the output. It is the interface between circuit and external environment and models the activation of the promoters in response to the inputs.</p>
 +
 
 +
                <p>This component is modeled deterministically as a set of ODEs using leaky Hill functions, since noise is negligible. This is intuitively supported by the high number of molecules involved and the frequency of the binding/unbinding events, which are much faster than gene expression. The hypothesis has been verified by comparing determinitic and stochastic models.
 +
                </p>
 +
                <h3>SWITCH MODULE</h3>
 +
                <h3>REPORTER MODULE</h3>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
         <div class="sec white">
+
         <div class="sec white" id="references">
 
             <div>
 
             <div>
 
                 <h2>REFERENCES</h2>
 
                 <h2>REFERENCES</h2>
 +
                <ul>
 +
                    <li><a name="cit1" class></a>[1] Lillacci, Gabriele, and Mustafa Khammash. "The signal within the noise: efficient inference of stochastic gene regulation models using fluorescence histograms and stochastic simulations." <i>Bioinformatics</i> 29.18 (2013): 2311-2319.
 +
                </ul>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>

Revision as of 10:40, 28 September 2016

MODEL

OVERVIEW

Due to the complexity of our system, an intuitive design would not be sufficient. Several components must be tuned specifically for our application, and the correct functioning of the candidate designs is not obvious. We developed a hybrid deterministic-stochastic model of our system covering the known mechanics of the components we use. The main goals include a model-based design of the system, tuning of the system components for our application and prediction of the system behavior.

The stochastic approach of our model allows us to exploit the intrinsic noise at our advantage: our model describes the distribution of the population's behavoir, which is much more informative than the average. We can thus interpret quantitative outputs of the system with greater accuracy.

The model matches the modular sructure of the system, making easier to exchange components and test their behavior in the full system. Thanks to this feature we were able to quickly integrate and tune alternative parts like the lactate sensor and the CRISPR switch.

The parameters of the model are strictly based on literature or experimental characterization of the single components. The estiamtion of the parameters uses INSIGHT, a recent method based on Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) and flow cytomerty data.1

CONTRIBUTIONS

EARLY DESIGN INSIGHTS

Thanks to qualitative simulations of the system during the design phase, we managed to get early information about the behavior of the the system. In particular the model advised us on the design of the reporter system, the placement of the integrase gene and the choice of plasmid ORIs.

Moreover we were able to identify potential problems (like leakiness and sensitivity) and predict their influence on the final system. We designed and constructed the system under awareness of those critical points.

SYSTEM TUNING

Since our application targets specific time and concentration ranges we used the model to tune the components of the system. Using the sensor module was tuned for the relevant concentrations of quorum sensing molecule and the switch kinetics were adapted for the expected time scale of the measurements.

SYSTEM SIMULATION

After the characterization of the single components we were able to simulate the full system and validate its behavior. This allowed us to model the recorded signal as function of the measured fluorescence distribution, which is a critical operation during actual investigation. The stochastic nature of our model allows us to obtain additional information by taking advantage of the population effect.

MAIN RESULTS

EARLY DESIGN INSIGHTS

SYSTEM TUNING

Bottom-up tuning. 1) Reporters, 2) Switch, 3) Sensors

SYSTEM SIMULATION

MODEL STRUCTURE

For simplicity and modularity the model is divided in three parts. Those modules are designed to be easily interchangeable. Although here the model is explained in the context of IBD investigation, its structure is general enough to be employed in other associative learning applications.

Figure 1: Schematic view of the model structure.

Figure 1 shows a schematic view of the model structure. In order to maximize flexibility we choosed promoter activities as interfaces between modules. Since we tune the system in a bottom-up fashion we explicitely avoided backward dependencies.

SENSOR MODULE

The sensor module is composed by an AND gate for the association of the desired events and a regulated promoter for the induction of the output. It is the interface between circuit and external environment and models the activation of the promoters in response to the inputs.

This component is modeled deterministically as a set of ODEs using leaky Hill functions, since noise is negligible. This is intuitively supported by the high number of molecules involved and the frequency of the binding/unbinding events, which are much faster than gene expression. The hypothesis has been verified by comparing determinitic and stochastic models.

SWITCH MODULE

REPORTER MODULE

REFERENCES

  • [1] Lillacci, Gabriele, and Mustafa Khammash. "The signal within the noise: efficient inference of stochastic gene regulation models using fluorescence histograms and stochastic simulations." Bioinformatics 29.18 (2013): 2311-2319.

Thanks to the sponsors that supported our project: