Difference between revisions of "Team:ShanghaitechChina/Proof"
m |
|||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
| − | 2. Successful construction of hydrogenase gene clusters in one plasmid | + | 2. Successful construction of hydrogenase gene clusters in one plasmid based on Acembl system, as confirmed by gene sequence and successful protein expression revealed by SDS and Western Blot. This device is named Device 3. <p></p> Please refer to <b><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:ShanghaitechChina/Hydrogen">Hydrogenase Session</a></b> for more details. </p> |
3. Successful demonstration of normal catalytic properties of hydrogenates using freely-flowing CdS Nanorods. This make device 4. <p></p> | 3. Successful demonstration of normal catalytic properties of hydrogenates using freely-flowing CdS Nanorods. This make device 4. <p></p> | ||
| Line 216: | Line 216: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/65/Pict2.png" style="width:100%;"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/65/Pict2.png" style="width:100%;"> | ||
| − | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 11</b> Integration of four basic plasmid backbones into one.</p> |
We basically relied on the Acembl system for hydrogenases gene cluster construction and finished the cloning of single device with sequencing confirmation. | We basically relied on the Acembl system for hydrogenases gene cluster construction and finished the cloning of single device with sequencing confirmation. | ||
(Click to see the detail sequenced information: <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/75/G_HydA_SpyCatcher.pdf">HydA-SpyCatcher</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/db/G_HydA_SpyTag.pdf">HydA-SpyTag</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/91/G_HydE.pdf">HydE</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/98/G_HydF.pdf">HydF</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bf/G_HydG.pdf">HydG</a>)</p></h5> | (Click to see the detail sequenced information: <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/75/G_HydA_SpyCatcher.pdf">HydA-SpyCatcher</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/db/G_HydA_SpyTag.pdf">HydA-SpyTag</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/91/G_HydE.pdf">HydE</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/98/G_HydF.pdf">HydF</a>, <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bf/G_HydG.pdf">HydG</a>)</p></h5> | ||
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
We fused pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spytag/pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spycatcher with pDK-HydF together as the first step. To test if we successfully fused the two, we use single restricted endonuclease digestion of XhoI. The restriction gives two bands on a 1% TAE Gel, in accordance with the band predicted by SnapGene®.<p></p> | We fused pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spytag/pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spycatcher with pDK-HydF together as the first step. To test if we successfully fused the two, we use single restricted endonuclease digestion of XhoI. The restriction gives two bands on a 1% TAE Gel, in accordance with the band predicted by SnapGene®.<p></p> | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3c/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-2-tag.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3c/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-2-tag.png"></center> | ||
| − | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 12A</b> Fusion of plasmid 1 and plasmid 4.</p> |
Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spytag x pDK-HydF gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with two bands at 5427bp and 2146bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction.<p></p> | Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spytag x pDK-HydF gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with two bands at 5427bp and 2146bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction.<p></p> | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-2-cat.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/35/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-2-cat.png"></center> | ||
| − | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 12B</b> Fusion of plasmid 2 and plasmid 4.</p> |
Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spycatcher x pDK-HydF gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with two bands at 5427bp and 2455bp, respectively. The 2455bp is larger than 2146bp due to the larger SpyCatcher. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-Spycatcher x pDK-HydF gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with two bands at 5427bp and 2455bp, respectively. The 2455bp is larger than 2146bp due to the larger SpyCatcher. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | ||
| − | Figure | + | Figure 12A/B shows that plasmid1/2 and 4 are successfully fused.<p></p> |
<h4><b>Second step:Fusion of plasmid in step one and plasmid 3.</b></h4> | <h4><b>Second step:Fusion of plasmid in step one and plasmid 3.</b></h4> | ||
We test through the selection of LB solid plate with three resistance, Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, and kanamycin. Then we use single restricted endonuclease digestion of XhoI. There should be two kinds of ways in fusing. Comparing our electrophoresis band with the prediction by SnapGene®, we confirmed the kind we obtained.<p></p> | We test through the selection of LB solid plate with three resistance, Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, and kanamycin. Then we use single restricted endonuclease digestion of XhoI. There should be two kinds of ways in fusing. Comparing our electrophoresis band with the prediction by SnapGene®, we confirmed the kind we obtained.<p></p> | ||
| Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
After the fusion of the plasmid in step one and plasmid 3, there will be one more enzyme restriction site of XhoI. Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-SpyTag x pDK-HydF x pDC-HydE gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with three bands at 5427bp, 2897bp and 2249bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | After the fusion of the plasmid in step one and plasmid 3, there will be one more enzyme restriction site of XhoI. Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-SpyTag x pDK-HydF x pDC-HydE gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with three bands at 5427bp, 2897bp and 2249bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-3-cat.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/09/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-3-cat.png"></center> | ||
| − | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 12D</b> Fusion of the plasmid in step one(12B) and plasmid 3.</p> |
After the fusion of the plasmid in step one and plasmid 3, there will be one more enzyme restriction site of XhoI. Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-SpyCatcher x pDK-HydF x pDC-HydE gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with three bands at 5427bp, 2897bp and 2558bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | After the fusion of the plasmid in step one and plasmid 3, there will be one more enzyme restriction site of XhoI. Single restricted-endonuclease digestion of Xhol in pACE-Histag-TEV-HydA-SpyCatcher x pDK-HydF x pDC-HydE gives two bands. The left pic refers to expected results based on SnapGene® software prediction, with three bands at 5427bp, 2897bp and 2558bp, respectively. The right figure refers to the experimental results, which is in good agreement with the software prediction. <p></p> | ||
Figure 1C/D shows that plasmids obtained in step 1 and plasmid 3 are successfully fused.<p></p> | Figure 1C/D shows that plasmids obtained in step 1 and plasmid 3 are successfully fused.<p></p> | ||
| Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
This fusion was conferred many possibilities due to the multiple loxP sites that are potentially recognized by Cre, and the fact that some fused loxP sites are reversely separated. However, since the plasmid in step 2 and plasmid 5 are put into the reaction in equal molar, the fully fused plasmid has a better chance. In parallel, we mixed four (plasmid 1/2, 3, 4, 5) plasmids together. After characterization by endonuclease restriction, we obtained the final plasmid. In addition, we find that the mixing of four in one reaction is not efficient.<p></p> | This fusion was conferred many possibilities due to the multiple loxP sites that are potentially recognized by Cre, and the fact that some fused loxP sites are reversely separated. However, since the plasmid in step 2 and plasmid 5 are put into the reaction in equal molar, the fully fused plasmid has a better chance. In parallel, we mixed four (plasmid 1/2, 3, 4, 5) plasmids together. After characterization by endonuclease restriction, we obtained the final plasmid. In addition, we find that the mixing of four in one reaction is not efficient.<p></p> | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e2/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-4-tag.png"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e2/T--ShanghaitechChina--clone--GEL-4-tag.png"></center> | ||
| − | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Figure 12E</b> Fusion of the plasmid in step (12C) and plasmid 3.</p> |
For a whole fused plasmid, It becomes hard to analyze it with just Xho I single enzyme. The bar at 3k actually accounts for two bars, with a separation of 20bp. In the picture, although the four bands predicted by SnapGene® can be found on our real gel, it is less clear. <p></p> | For a whole fused plasmid, It becomes hard to analyze it with just Xho I single enzyme. The bar at 3k actually accounts for two bars, with a separation of 20bp. In the picture, although the four bands predicted by SnapGene® can be found on our real gel, it is less clear. <p></p> | ||
Given the inconvenience with testing by restriction, we turned to resistance screening. The result is that it is resistant to four antibodies (Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, kanamycin and Spectinomycin). | Given the inconvenience with testing by restriction, we turned to resistance screening. The result is that it is resistant to four antibodies (Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, kanamycin and Spectinomycin). | ||
Revision as of 19:16, 19 October 2016
