Difference between revisions of "Team:CSU Fort Collins/InterLab"

(Created page with "{{CSU_Fort_Collins}} <html> </html>")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{CSU_Fort_Collins}}
 
{{CSU_Fort_Collins}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
 +
<h1> 2016 InterLab Measurement Study </h1>
 +
<b>
 +
<b>
 +
 +
<h2> Experiments </h2>
 +
<p> The wet lab portion of the study is in our Notebook. As for the experimental protocol, we adhered to the <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c5/InterLab_iGEM2016_Plate_Reader_Protocol_Updated_July.pdf" target="_blank">plate reader protocol</a> provided by iGEM Headquarters. </p>
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<h2> Results </h2>
 +
<p> 
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/8/81/CSU_InterlabRes.png">
 +
 +
 +
 +
<p> We participated in the study
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<br>
 +
<h2> Reflections </h2>
 +
<p> Our team also participated in the measurement study <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:CU-Boulder" target="_blank">last year</a>. This year, we appreciated the organized experimental protocol which required the same positive and negative controls as well as fluorescence normalization standards. In comparison to last year, we have greater confidence in using our data to compare to measurement studies conducted in other labs.
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/01/CSU_InterLabDataTable.png">
 +
<br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/07/CSU_InterLabBarGraph2.png">
 +
 +
 +
 +
<b>
 +
<h2> Possible Improvements to the Study </h2>
 +
 +
<p> </p>
 +
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 21:30, 19 October 2016

MENU ▤
CSU iGEM



2016 InterLab Measurement Study

Experiments

The wet lab portion of the study is in our Notebook. As for the experimental protocol, we adhered to the plate reader protocol provided by iGEM Headquarters.


Results


We participated in the study


Reflections

Our team also participated in the measurement study last year. This year, we appreciated the organized experimental protocol which required the same positive and negative controls as well as fluorescence normalization standards. In comparison to last year, we have greater confidence in using our data to compare to measurement studies conducted in other labs.



Possible Improvements to the Study